CNA vs. WRB
CNA (CNA Financial Corporation) and WRB (W. R. Berkley Corporation) are both stocks. Both operate in the Insurance - Property & Casualty industry within the Financial Services sector. Over the past 10 years, CNA returned 13.21%/yr vs 18.32%/yr for WRB. Their 0.40 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
CNA vs. WRB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CNA achieves a 16.93% return, which is significantly higher than WRB's 5.59% return. Over the past 10 years, CNA has underperformed WRB with an annualized return of 13.21%, while WRB has yielded a comparatively higher 18.32% annualized return.
CNA
- 1D
- -1.48%
- 1M
- 2.54%
- 6M
- 16.64%
- YTD
- 16.93%
- 1Y
- 29.71%
- 3Y*
- 19.24%
- 5Y*
- 11.93%
- 10Y*
- 13.21%
- ALL TIME*
- 5.13%
WRB
- 1D
- -1.14%
- 1M
- 0.64%
- 6M
- 7.96%
- YTD
- 5.59%
- 1Y
- 8.76%
- 3Y*
- 24.47%
- 5Y*
- 20.49%
- 10Y*
- 18.32%
- ALL TIME*
- 16.33%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $24.25M | $25.90M | $26.39M | |
| $146.36M | $145.89M | $144.62M |
CNA vs. WRB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CNA CNA Financial Corporation | 16.93% | 6.96% | 23.96% | 7.14% | 3.82% | 19.07% | -5.42% | 9.47% | -11.12% | 36.94% |
WRB W. R. Berkley Corporation | 5.59% | 23.02% | 27.19% | 0.25% | 33.92% | 27.39% | -3.14% | 43.80% | 5.96% | 10.21% |
Correlation
The correlation between CNA and WRB is 0.65, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.65 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.64 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.67 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.67 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 11, 1985 | 0.40 |
Over the past year, CNA and WRB have become more correlated (0.65) than their long-term average of 0.40, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Fundamentals
CNA:
$14.19B
WRB:
$27.00B
CNA:
$4.88
WRB:
$4.72
CNA:
10.74
WRB:
15.38
CNA:
0.92
WRB:
0.90
CNA:
0.96
WRB:
1.94
CNA:
$14.82B
WRB:
$14.85B
CNA:
$4.95B
WRB:
$3.88B
CNA:
$1.73B
WRB:
$2.44B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CNA vs. WRB — Risk / Return Rank
CNA
WRB
CNA vs. WRB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CNA Financial Corporation (CNA) and W. R. Berkley Corporation (WRB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CNA | WRB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.94 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.19 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.09 | +0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.96 | 0.54 | +1.42 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.50 | 1.02 | +3.48 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CNA vs. WRB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CNA drawdown since its inception was -87.48%, which is greater than WRB's maximum drawdown of -69.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CNA and WRB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CNA | WRB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -87.48% | -69.33% | -18.15% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.55% | -17.62% | +3.07% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.55% | -17.62% | +3.07% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.67% | -26.29% | +0.62% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.91% | -45.35% | -0.56% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.13% | -4.77% | -0.36% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -25.47% | -14.55% | -10.92% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.33% | 9.30% | -2.97% |
Volatility
CNA vs. WRB - Volatility Comparison
CNA Financial Corporation (CNA) and W. R. Berkley Corporation (WRB) have volatilities of 8.06% and 7.84%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CNA | WRB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.06% | 7.84% | +0.22% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.11% | 16.31% | +0.80% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.98% | 22.31% | -1.33% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.56% | 22.90% | -1.34% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.98% | 24.63% | +0.35% |
Dividends
CNA vs. WRB - Dividend Comparison
CNA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.39%, more than WRB's 3.54% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CNA CNA Financial Corporation | 7.39% | 8.04% | 7.77% | 6.81% | 8.51% | 5.15% | 8.93% | 7.59% | 7.47% | 5.84% | 7.23% | 8.53% |
WRB W. R. Berkley Corporation | 3.54% | 2.64% | 2.39% | 2.73% | 1.22% | 2.44% | 0.71% | 2.43% | 2.83% | 2.16% | 2.27% | 0.86% |
Financials
CNA vs. WRB - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between CNA Financial Corporation and W. R. Berkley Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
CNA vs. WRB - Profitability Comparison
CNA - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, CNA Financial Corporation reported a gross profit of 1.50B and revenue of 3.68B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 40.9%.
WRB - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, W. R. Berkley Corporation reported a gross profit of 1.75B and revenue of 3.69B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 47.5%.
CNA - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, CNA Financial Corporation reported an operating income of 300.00M and revenue of 3.68B, resulting in an operating margin of 8.2%.
WRB - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, W. R. Berkley Corporation reported an operating income of 616.10M and revenue of 3.69B, resulting in an operating margin of 16.7%.
CNA - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, CNA Financial Corporation reported a net income of 323.00M and revenue of 3.68B, resulting in a net margin of 8.8%.
WRB - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, W. R. Berkley Corporation reported a net income of 515.22M and revenue of 3.69B, resulting in a net margin of 14.0%.
Frequently Asked Questions
CNA and WRB have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CNA has higher volatility (8.06%) compared to WRB (7.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CNA dropped -87.48% vs WRB's -69.33%.
CNA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.36 vs 0.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CNA and WRB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer