CANE vs. TILL
CANE (Teucrium Sugar Fund) and TILL (Teucrium Agricultural Strategy No K-1 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CANE is a Agricultural Commodities fund tracking the Teucrium Sugar Fund Benchmark, while TILL is a Commodities fund actively managed by Teucrium. CANE is passively managed, while TILL is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, CANE returned -10.43%/yr vs -5.51%/yr for TILL. A 0.53 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CANE charges 1.88%/yr vs 0.89%/yr for TILL.
Performance
CANE vs. TILL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CANE achieves a -0.77% return, which is significantly lower than TILL's 6.30% return.
CANE
- 1D
- -1.02%
- 1M
- -5.56%
- YTD
- -0.77%
- 6M
- 0.83%
- 1Y
- -14.28%
- 3Y*
- -10.43%
- 5Y*
- 2.90%
- 10Y*
- -2.23%
TILL
- 1D
- -1.34%
- 1M
- -6.04%
- YTD
- 6.30%
- 6M
- 4.59%
- 1Y
- 0.28%
- 3Y*
- -5.51%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CANE vs. TILL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CANE Teucrium Sugar Fund | -0.77% | -14.65% | -7.79% | 30.06% | -4.51% |
TILL Teucrium Agricultural Strategy No K-1 ETF | 6.30% | -5.97% | -13.98% | -5.00% | -12.66% |
Correlation
The correlation between CANE and TILL is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 18, 2022 | 0.53 |
The correlation between CANE and TILL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.53 to 0.55 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CANE vs. TILL — Risk / Return Rank
CANE
TILL
CANE vs. TILL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Teucrium Sugar Fund (CANE) and Teucrium Agricultural Strategy No K-1 ETF (TILL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CANE | TILL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.72 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.03 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.90 | 1.01 | -0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.72 | 0.03 | -0.75 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.18 | 0.05 | -1.23 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CANE | TILL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.69 | 0.02 | -0.72 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.14 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.10 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.26 | -0.55 | +0.28 |
Drawdowns
CANE vs. TILL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CANE drawdown since its inception was -81.30%, which is greater than TILL's maximum drawdown of -33.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CANE and TILL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CANE | TILL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -81.30% | -33.76% | -47.54% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.89% | -8.98% | -10.91% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -41.73% | -30.40% | -11.33% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -41.73% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -67.29% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -63.21% | -28.66% | -34.55% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -56.50% | -21.39% | -35.11% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.35% | 5.39% | +6.96% |
Volatility
CANE vs. TILL - Volatility Comparison
Teucrium Sugar Fund (CANE) has a higher volatility of 6.85% compared to Teucrium Agricultural Strategy No K-1 ETF (TILL) at 5.35%. This indicates that CANE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TILL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CANE | TILL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.85% | 5.35% | +1.50% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.81% | 10.19% | +5.62% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.69% | 12.63% | +8.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.07% | 14.73% | +6.34% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.72% | 14.73% | +6.99% |
CANE vs. TILL - Expense Ratio Comparison
CANE has a 1.88% expense ratio, which is higher than TILL's 0.89% expense ratio.
Dividends
CANE vs. TILL - Dividend Comparison
CANE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TILL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.67%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CANE Teucrium Sugar Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TILL Teucrium Agricultural Strategy No K-1 ETF | 4.67% | 4.97% | 2.55% | 51.24% | 0.73% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CANE and TILL have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CANE has higher volatility (6.85%) compared to TILL (5.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CANE dropped -81.30% vs TILL's -33.76%.
On 3-year performance, TILL leads with -5.51% vs -10.43% for CANE. On fees, TILL is cheaper at 0.89% per year. On volatility, TILL has been the lower-risk option at 5.35%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, TILL has performed better with a -5.51% return vs -10.43%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
TILL is cheaper with a 0.89% expense ratio, compared with 1.88% for CANE.
TILL has the higher dividend yield at 4.67%, compared with 0.00% for CANE.
CANE is categorized as Agricultural Commodities, while TILL is Commodities. Their fees differ too: 1.88% for CANE and 0.89% for TILL.
TILL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.02 vs -0.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CANE and TILL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer