PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CAFG vs. VIOG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CAFG vs. VIOG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF (CAFG) and Vanguard S&P Small-Cap 600 Growth ETF (VIOG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CAFG achieves a 27.15% return, which is significantly higher than VIOG's 17.03% return.


CAFG

1D
1.09%
1M
2.66%
YTD
27.15%
6M
25.89%
1Y
32.91%
3Y*
15.59%
5Y*
10Y*

VIOG

1D
1.43%
1M
0.62%
YTD
17.03%
6M
15.14%
1Y
28.32%
3Y*
15.66%
5Y*
5.78%
10Y*
10.87%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CAFG vs. VIOG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
CAFG
Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF
27.15%0.17%6.95%20.44%
VIOG
Vanguard S&P Small-Cap 600 Growth ETF
17.03%5.40%9.23%20.03%

Correlation

The correlation between CAFG and VIOG is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 3, 2023

0.92

The correlation between CAFG and VIOG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

CAFG vs. VIOG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
CAFG
VIOG

Technology

30.8%
19.7%

Industrials

19.3%
19.5%

Healthcare

18.8%
14.6%

Energy

13.4%
4.1%

Consumer Cyclical

7.2%
10.9%

Communication Services

3.7%
2.7%

Consumer Defensive

3.0%
3.3%

Basic Materials

2.4%
3.1%

Utilities

1.4%
1.7%

Financial Services

-

13.7%

Real Estate

-

6.6%

Technology

CAFG
30.8%
VIOG
19.7%

Industrials

CAFG
19.3%
VIOG
19.5%

Healthcare

CAFG
18.8%
VIOG
14.6%

Energy

CAFG
13.4%
VIOG
4.1%

Consumer Cyclical

CAFG
7.2%
VIOG
10.9%

Communication Services

CAFG
3.7%
VIOG
2.7%

Consumer Defensive

CAFG
3.0%
VIOG
3.3%

Basic Materials

CAFG
2.4%
VIOG
3.1%

Utilities

CAFG
1.4%
VIOG
1.7%

Financial Services

CAFG

-

VIOG
13.7%

Real Estate

CAFG

-

VIOG
6.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CAFG vs. VIOG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CAFG
CAFG Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
CAFG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CAFG Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
CAFG Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
CAFG Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
CAFG Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank

VIOG
VIOG Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
VIOG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VIOG Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
VIOG Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
VIOG Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
VIOG Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CAFG vs. VIOG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF (CAFG) and Vanguard S&P Small-Cap 600 Growth ETF (VIOG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CAFGVIOGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.27

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.31

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.28

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.06

3.15

+0.92

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.23

10.76

+2.48

CAFG vs. VIOG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CAFG Sharpe Ratio is 1.90, which is comparable to the VIOG Sharpe Ratio of 1.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CAFG and VIOG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CAFGVIOGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.90

1.63

+0.27

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.27

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.48

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.89

0.60

+0.29

Drawdowns

CAFG vs. VIOG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CAFG drawdown since its inception was -23.66%, smaller than the maximum VIOG drawdown of -41.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CAFG and VIOG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CAFGVIOGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.66%

-41.73%

+18.07%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.13%

-9.03%

+0.90%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.66%

-27.35%

+3.69%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.15%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.06%

+0.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.52%

-7.62%

+2.10%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.49%

2.64%

-0.15%

Volatility

CAFG vs. VIOG - Volatility Comparison

Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF (CAFG) and Vanguard S&P Small-Cap 600 Growth ETF (VIOG) have volatilities of 4.61% and 4.53%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CAFGVIOGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.61%

4.53%

+0.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.78%

12.51%

+0.27%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.40%

17.48%

-0.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.57%

21.48%

-1.91%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.57%

22.84%

-3.27%

CAFG vs. VIOG - Expense Ratio Comparison

CAFG has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than VIOG's 0.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

CAFG vs. VIOG - Dividend Comparison

CAFG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.34%, less than VIOG's 0.82% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CAFG
Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF
0.34%0.35%0.36%0.39%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VIOG
Vanguard S&P Small-Cap 600 Growth ETF
0.82%1.04%1.03%1.15%1.17%0.69%0.68%1.09%0.76%0.87%0.92%1.04%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, CAFG and VIOG move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

CAFG has higher volatility (4.61%) compared to VIOG (4.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CAFG dropped -23.66% vs VIOG's -41.73%.

On 3-year performance, VIOG leads with 15.66% vs 15.59% for CAFG. On fees, VIOG is cheaper at 0.15% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, VIOG has performed better with a 15.66% return vs 15.59%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VIOG is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for CAFG.

VIOG has the higher dividend yield at 0.82%, compared with 0.34% for CAFG.

CAFG tracks Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while VIOG tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: Pacer and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for CAFG and 0.15% for VIOG.

CAFG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.90 vs 1.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CAFG and VIOG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer