VIOG vs. SLYG
VIOG (Vanguard S&P Small-Cap 600 Growth ETF) and SLYG (SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Growth ETF) are both Small Cap Growth Equities funds tracking the S&P SmallCap 600 Growth Index, from Vanguard and State Street respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VIOG returned 11.72%/yr vs 11.75%/yr for SLYG. With a 0.96 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. Both charge a 0.15% expense ratio.
Performance
VIOG vs. SLYG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with VIOG having a 21.75% return and SLYG slightly higher at 21.87%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with VIOG having a 11.72% annualized return and SLYG not far ahead at 11.75%.
VIOG
- 1D
- 0.24%
- 1M
- 5.94%
- YTD
- 21.75%
- 6M
- 17.76%
- 1Y
- 34.28%
- 3Y*
- 16.88%
- 5Y*
- 6.57%
- 10Y*
- 11.72%
SLYG
- 1D
- 0.35%
- 1M
- 6.00%
- YTD
- 21.87%
- 6M
- 17.87%
- 1Y
- 34.08%
- 3Y*
- 16.89%
- 5Y*
- 6.59%
- 10Y*
- 11.75%
VIOG vs. SLYG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VIOG Vanguard S&P Small-Cap 600 Growth ETF | 21.75% | 5.40% | 9.23% | 16.92% | -21.14% | 22.49% | 19.68% | 21.16% | -4.57% | 14.70% |
SLYG SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Growth ETF | 21.87% | 5.20% | 9.38% | 17.27% | -21.26% | 22.42% | 19.48% | 20.97% | -4.20% | 14.62% |
Correlation
The correlation between VIOG and SLYG is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 9, 2010 | 0.96 |
The correlation between VIOG and SLYG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.
VIOG vs. SLYG - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VIOG
SLYG
Technology
Industrials
Healthcare
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Real Estate
Energy
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Utilities
Technology
VIOG
SLYG
Industrials
VIOG
SLYG
Healthcare
VIOG
SLYG
Financial Services
VIOG
SLYG
Consumer Cyclical
VIOG
SLYG
Real Estate
VIOG
SLYG
Energy
VIOG
SLYG
Consumer Defensive
VIOG
SLYG
Basic Materials
VIOG
SLYG
Communication Services
VIOG
SLYG
Utilities
VIOG
SLYG
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VIOG vs. SLYG — Risk / Return Rank
VIOG
SLYG
VIOG vs. SLYG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard S&P Small-Cap 600 Growth ETF (VIOG) and SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Growth ETF (SLYG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VIOG | SLYG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.01 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.02 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.33 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.81 | 3.76 | +0.05 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.14 | 13.24 | -0.11 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VIOG vs. SLYG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VIOG drawdown since its inception was -41.73%, smaller than the maximum SLYG drawdown of -62.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VIOG and SLYG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VIOG | SLYG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.73% | -62.92% | +21.19% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.03% | -9.10% | +0.07% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.35% | -27.39% | +0.04% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.15% | -29.18% | +0.03% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.73% | -41.86% | +0.13% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.60% | -14.88% | +7.28% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.62% | 2.58% | +0.04% |
Volatility
VIOG vs. SLYG - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard S&P Small-Cap 600 Growth ETF (VIOG) and SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Growth ETF (SLYG) have volatilities of 5.42% and 5.21%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VIOG | SLYG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.42% | 5.21% | +0.21% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.01% | 12.96% | +0.05% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.95% | 17.96% | -0.01% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.53% | 21.56% | -0.03% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.88% | 22.77% | +0.11% |
VIOG vs. SLYG - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both VIOG and SLYG have an expense ratio of 0.15%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VIOG vs. SLYG - Dividend Comparison
VIOG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.79%, less than SLYG's 0.88% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SLYG SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Growth ETF | 0.88% | 0.86% | 1.22% | 1.18% | 1.18% | 0.68% | 0.71% | 1.08% | 1.06% | 4.74% | 1.13% | 5.75% |
VIOG Vanguard S&P Small-Cap 600 Growth ETF | 0.79% | 1.04% | 1.03% | 1.15% | 1.17% | 0.69% | 0.68% | 1.09% | 0.76% | 0.87% | 0.92% | 1.04% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.99, VIOG and SLYG move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
VIOG has higher volatility (5.42%) compared to SLYG (5.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VIOG dropped -41.73% vs SLYG's -62.92%.
On 10-year performance, SLYG leads with 11.75% vs 11.72% for VIOG. Both ETFs have the same 0.15% expense ratio. On volatility, SLYG has been the lower-risk option at 5.21%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SLYG has performed better with a 11.75% return vs 11.72%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VIOG and SLYG have the same expense ratio: 0.15% per year.
SLYG has the higher dividend yield at 0.88%, compared with 0.79% for VIOG.
Both ETFs track S&P SmallCap 600 Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and State Street.
VIOG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.92 vs 1.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VIOG and SLYG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer