PortfoliosLab logo
CAFG vs. WAMVX
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between CAFG and WAMVX is 0.73, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Performance

CAFG vs. WAMVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF (CAFG) and Wasatch Micro Cap Value Fund (WAMVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

10.00%20.00%30.00%40.00%50.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
18.13%
30.61%
CAFG
WAMVX

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

CAFG:

-0.02

WAMVX:

0.58

Sortino Ratio

CAFG:

0.13

WAMVX:

0.97

Omega Ratio

CAFG:

1.02

WAMVX:

1.12

Calmar Ratio

CAFG:

-0.02

WAMVX:

0.34

Martin Ratio

CAFG:

-0.06

WAMVX:

1.60

Ulcer Index

CAFG:

8.14%

WAMVX:

8.10%

Daily Std Dev

CAFG:

22.87%

WAMVX:

22.31%

Max Drawdown

CAFG:

-23.66%

WAMVX:

-66.97%

Current Drawdown

CAFG:

-15.55%

WAMVX:

-30.56%

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with CAFG having a -8.30% return and WAMVX slightly higher at -8.13%.


CAFG

YTD

-8.30%

1M

7.02%

6M

-10.08%

1Y

-1.90%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

WAMVX

YTD

-8.13%

1M

10.03%

6M

-4.00%

1Y

10.34%

5Y*

6.78%

10Y*

2.68%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


CAFG vs. WAMVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CAFG has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than WAMVX's 1.66% expense ratio.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

CAFG vs. WAMVX — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CAFG
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of CAFG is 1717
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of CAFG is 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of CAFG is 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of CAFG is 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of CAFG is 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of CAFG is 1717
Martin Ratio Rank

WAMVX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of WAMVX is 4848
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of WAMVX is 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of WAMVX is 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of WAMVX is 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of WAMVX is 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of WAMVX is 4545
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

CAFG vs. WAMVX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF (CAFG) and Wasatch Micro Cap Value Fund (WAMVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current CAFG Sharpe Ratio is -0.02, which is lower than the WAMVX Sharpe Ratio of 0.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CAFG and WAMVX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.000.001.002.003.00December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-0.02
0.57
CAFG
WAMVX

Dividends

CAFG vs. WAMVX - Dividend Comparison

CAFG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.36%, while WAMVX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
CAFG
Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF
0.36%0.36%0.39%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
WAMVX
Wasatch Micro Cap Value Fund
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%22.38%13.06%9.03%13.59%7.98%1.67%12.13%15.73%

Drawdowns

CAFG vs. WAMVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CAFG drawdown since its inception was -23.66%, smaller than the maximum WAMVX drawdown of -66.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CAFG and WAMVX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-15.55%
-14.29%
CAFG
WAMVX

Volatility

CAFG vs. WAMVX - Volatility Comparison

Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF (CAFG) has a higher volatility of 10.54% compared to Wasatch Micro Cap Value Fund (WAMVX) at 9.03%. This indicates that CAFG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WAMVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%14.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
10.54%
9.03%
CAFG
WAMVX