PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VIOG vs. XSMO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VIOG vs. XSMO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard S&P Small-Cap 600 Growth ETF (VIOG) and Invesco S&P SmallCap Momentum ETF (XSMO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VIOG achieves a 21.75% return, which is significantly lower than XSMO's 25.55% return. Over the past 10 years, VIOG has underperformed XSMO with an annualized return of 11.72%, while XSMO has yielded a comparatively higher 15.36% annualized return.


VIOG

1D
0.24%
1M
5.94%
YTD
21.75%
6M
17.76%
1Y
34.28%
3Y*
16.88%
5Y*
6.57%
10Y*
11.72%

XSMO

1D
0.32%
1M
4.89%
YTD
25.55%
6M
21.13%
1Y
37.28%
3Y*
25.72%
5Y*
11.94%
10Y*
15.36%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VIOG vs. XSMO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VIOG
Vanguard S&P Small-Cap 600 Growth ETF
21.75%5.40%9.23%16.92%-21.14%22.49%19.68%21.16%-4.57%14.70%
XSMO
Invesco S&P SmallCap Momentum ETF
25.55%9.80%17.45%21.55%-15.44%19.24%21.96%28.65%-3.44%23.95%

Correlation

The correlation between VIOG and XSMO is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 9, 2010

0.88

The correlation between VIOG and XSMO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

VIOG vs. XSMO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VIOG
XSMO

Technology

19.7%
22.1%

Industrials

19.5%
18.7%

Healthcare

14.6%
14.3%

Financial Services

13.7%
12.2%

Consumer Cyclical

10.9%
8.6%

Real Estate

6.6%
4.9%

Energy

4.1%
2.9%

Consumer Defensive

3.3%
2.4%

Basic Materials

3.1%
6.0%

Communication Services

2.7%
4.5%

Utilities

1.7%
3.5%

Technology

VIOG
19.7%
XSMO
22.1%

Industrials

VIOG
19.5%
XSMO
18.7%

Healthcare

VIOG
14.6%
XSMO
14.3%

Financial Services

VIOG
13.7%
XSMO
12.2%

Consumer Cyclical

VIOG
10.9%
XSMO
8.6%

Real Estate

VIOG
6.6%
XSMO
4.9%

Energy

VIOG
4.1%
XSMO
2.9%

Consumer Defensive

VIOG
3.3%
XSMO
2.4%

Basic Materials

VIOG
3.1%
XSMO
6.0%

Communication Services

VIOG
2.7%
XSMO
4.5%

Utilities

VIOG
1.7%
XSMO
3.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VIOG vs. XSMO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VIOG
VIOG Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
VIOG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VIOG Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
VIOG Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
VIOG Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
VIOG Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

XSMO
XSMO Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
XSMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XSMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
XSMO Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
XSMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
XSMO Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VIOG vs. XSMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard S&P Small-Cap 600 Growth ETF (VIOG) and Invesco S&P SmallCap Momentum ETF (XSMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VIOGXSMODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.03

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.33

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.81

4.21

-0.40

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.14

14.23

-1.09

VIOG vs. XSMO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VIOG Sharpe Ratio is 1.92, which is comparable to the XSMO Sharpe Ratio of 1.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VIOG and XSMO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VIOG vs. XSMO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VIOG drawdown since its inception was -41.73%, smaller than the maximum XSMO drawdown of -58.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VIOG and XSMO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VIOGXSMODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.73%

-58.06%

+16.33%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.03%

-8.89%

-0.14%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.35%

-24.76%

-2.59%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.15%

-29.62%

+0.47%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.73%

-39.39%

-2.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.60%

-11.11%

+3.51%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.62%

2.63%

-0.01%

Volatility

VIOG vs. XSMO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard S&P Small-Cap 600 Growth ETF (VIOG) is 5.42%, while Invesco S&P SmallCap Momentum ETF (XSMO) has a volatility of 7.19%. This indicates that VIOG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XSMO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VIOGXSMODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.42%

7.19%

-1.77%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.01%

14.89%

-1.88%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.95%

19.41%

-1.46%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.53%

22.64%

-1.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.88%

24.15%

-1.27%

VIOG vs. XSMO - Expense Ratio Comparison

VIOG has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than XSMO's 0.36% expense ratio.


Dividends

VIOG vs. XSMO - Dividend Comparison

VIOG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.79%, more than XSMO's 0.66% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VIOG
Vanguard S&P Small-Cap 600 Growth ETF
0.79%1.04%1.03%1.15%1.17%0.69%0.68%1.09%0.76%0.87%0.92%1.04%
XSMO
Invesco S&P SmallCap Momentum ETF
0.66%0.75%0.63%0.96%1.19%0.30%0.82%0.69%0.66%0.27%0.30%0.35%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, VIOG and XSMO move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

XSMO has higher volatility (7.19%) compared to VIOG (5.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VIOG dropped -41.73% vs XSMO's -58.06%.

On 10-year performance, XSMO leads with 15.36% vs 11.72% for VIOG. On fees, VIOG is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, VIOG has been the lower-risk option at 5.42%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, XSMO has performed better with a 15.36% return vs 11.72%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VIOG is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.36% for XSMO.

VIOG has the higher dividend yield at 0.79%, compared with 0.66% for XSMO.

VIOG is categorized as Small Cap Growth Equities, while XSMO is Momentum. VIOG tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Growth Index, while XSMO tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Momentum Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for VIOG and 0.36% for XSMO.

XSMO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.93 vs 1.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VIOG and XSMO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer