CAFG vs. COWG
Compare and contrast key facts about Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF (CAFG) and Pacer US Large Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF (COWG).
CAFG and COWG are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. CAFG is a passively managed fund by Pacer that tracks the performance of the Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders Index - Benchmark TR Gross. It was launched on May 1, 2023. COWG is a passively managed fund by Pacer that tracks the performance of the Pacer US Large Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders Index - USD - Benchmark TR Gross. It was launched on Dec 21, 2022. Both CAFG and COWG are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: CAFG or COWG.
Correlation
The correlation between CAFG and COWG is 0.71, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
CAFG vs. COWG - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
CAFG:
0.58
COWG:
2.42
CAFG:
0.95
COWG:
3.12
CAFG:
1.11
COWG:
1.42
CAFG:
1.22
COWG:
3.95
CAFG:
2.71
COWG:
14.18
CAFG:
4.02%
COWG:
3.09%
CAFG:
18.66%
COWG:
18.14%
CAFG:
-16.63%
COWG:
-11.11%
CAFG:
-4.96%
COWG:
0.00%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CAFG achieves a 3.20% return, which is significantly lower than COWG's 11.95% return.
CAFG
3.20%
1.04%
7.68%
10.79%
N/A
N/A
COWG
11.95%
7.88%
30.12%
42.91%
N/A
N/A
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CAFG vs. COWG - Expense Ratio Comparison
CAFG has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than COWG's 0.49% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
CAFG vs. COWG — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
CAFG
COWG
CAFG vs. COWG - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF (CAFG) and Pacer US Large Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF (COWG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
CAFG vs. COWG - Dividend Comparison
CAFG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.35%, less than COWG's 0.36% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|
CAFG Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF | 0.35% | 0.36% | 0.39% |
COWG Pacer US Large Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF | 0.36% | 0.40% | 0.47% |
Drawdowns
CAFG vs. COWG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CAFG drawdown since its inception was -16.63%, which is greater than COWG's maximum drawdown of -11.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CAFG and COWG. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
CAFG vs. COWG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF (CAFG) is 4.61%, while Pacer US Large Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF (COWG) has a volatility of 4.96%. This indicates that CAFG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than COWG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.