PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VIOG vs. VTWG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VIOG vs. VTWG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard S&P Small-Cap 600 Growth ETF (VIOG) and Vanguard Russell 2000 Growth ETF (VTWG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with VIOG having a 21.75% return and VTWG slightly higher at 22.21%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with VIOG having a 11.72% annualized return and VTWG not far ahead at 12.28%.


VIOG

1D
0.24%
1M
5.94%
YTD
21.75%
6M
17.76%
1Y
34.28%
3Y*
16.88%
5Y*
6.57%
10Y*
11.72%

VTWG

1D
1.11%
1M
5.90%
YTD
22.21%
6M
17.98%
1Y
43.59%
3Y*
19.92%
5Y*
5.88%
10Y*
12.28%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VIOG vs. VTWG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VIOG
Vanguard S&P Small-Cap 600 Growth ETF
21.75%5.40%9.23%16.92%-21.14%22.49%19.68%21.16%-4.57%14.70%
VTWG
Vanguard Russell 2000 Growth ETF
22.21%13.07%15.15%18.90%-26.49%2.84%34.72%28.75%-9.45%22.27%

Correlation

The correlation between VIOG and VTWG is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 22, 2010

0.91

The correlation between VIOG and VTWG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

VIOG vs. VTWG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VIOG
VTWG

Technology

19.7%
25.8%

Industrials

19.5%
23.1%

Healthcare

14.6%
22.0%

Financial Services

13.7%
7.8%

Consumer Cyclical

10.9%
7.1%

Real Estate

6.6%
2.0%

Energy

4.1%
3.1%

Consumer Defensive

3.3%
2.3%

Basic Materials

3.1%
4.0%

Communication Services

2.7%
2.2%

Utilities

1.7%
0.6%

Technology

VIOG
19.7%
VTWG
25.8%

Industrials

VIOG
19.5%
VTWG
23.1%

Healthcare

VIOG
14.6%
VTWG
22.0%

Financial Services

VIOG
13.7%
VTWG
7.8%

Consumer Cyclical

VIOG
10.9%
VTWG
7.1%

Real Estate

VIOG
6.6%
VTWG
2.0%

Energy

VIOG
4.1%
VTWG
3.1%

Consumer Defensive

VIOG
3.3%
VTWG
2.3%

Basic Materials

VIOG
3.1%
VTWG
4.0%

Communication Services

VIOG
2.7%
VTWG
2.2%

Utilities

VIOG
1.7%
VTWG
0.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VIOG vs. VTWG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VIOG
VIOG Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
VIOG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VIOG Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
VIOG Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
VIOG Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
VIOG Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

VTWG
VTWG Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
VTWG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VTWG Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
VTWG Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
VTWG Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
VTWG Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VIOG vs. VTWG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard S&P Small-Cap 600 Growth ETF (VIOG) and Vanguard Russell 2000 Growth ETF (VTWG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VIOGVTWGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.15

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.32

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.81

2.94

+0.87

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.14

10.57

+2.57

VIOG vs. VTWG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VIOG Sharpe Ratio is 1.92, which is comparable to the VTWG Sharpe Ratio of 1.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VIOG and VTWG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VIOG vs. VTWG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VIOG drawdown since its inception was -41.73%, roughly equal to the maximum VTWG drawdown of -42.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VIOG and VTWG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VIOGVTWGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.73%

-42.07%

+0.34%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.03%

-14.88%

+5.85%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.35%

-28.58%

+1.23%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.15%

-40.49%

+11.34%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.73%

-42.07%

+0.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.60%

-10.50%

+2.90%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.62%

4.14%

-1.52%

Volatility

VIOG vs. VTWG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard S&P Small-Cap 600 Growth ETF (VIOG) is 5.42%, while Vanguard Russell 2000 Growth ETF (VTWG) has a volatility of 7.67%. This indicates that VIOG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VTWG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VIOGVTWGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.42%

7.67%

-2.25%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.01%

16.86%

-3.85%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.95%

22.32%

-4.37%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.53%

24.67%

-3.14%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.88%

24.30%

-1.42%

VIOG vs. VTWG - Expense Ratio Comparison

VIOG has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than VTWG's 0.06% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VIOG vs. VTWG - Dividend Comparison

VIOG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.79%, more than VTWG's 0.58% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VIOG
Vanguard S&P Small-Cap 600 Growth ETF
0.79%1.04%1.03%1.15%1.17%0.69%0.68%1.09%0.76%0.87%0.92%1.04%
VTWG
Vanguard Russell 2000 Growth ETF
0.58%0.64%0.55%0.79%0.71%0.54%0.48%0.72%0.72%0.64%0.96%0.72%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, VIOG and VTWG move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

VTWG has higher volatility (7.67%) compared to VIOG (5.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VIOG dropped -41.73% vs VTWG's -42.07%.

On 10-year performance, VTWG leads with 12.28% vs 11.72% for VIOG. On fees, VTWG is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, VIOG has been the lower-risk option at 5.42%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VTWG has performed better with a 12.28% return vs 11.72%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VTWG is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for VIOG.

VIOG has the higher dividend yield at 0.79%, compared with 0.58% for VTWG.

VIOG tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Growth Index, while VTWG tracks Russell 2000 Growth Index. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for VIOG and 0.06% for VTWG.

VTWG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.97 vs 1.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VIOG and VTWG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer