CAFG vs. COWZ
Compare and contrast key facts about Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF (CAFG) and Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF (COWZ).
CAFG and COWZ are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. CAFG is a passively managed fund by Pacer that tracks the performance of the Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders Index - Benchmark TR Gross. It was launched on May 1, 2023. COWZ is a passively managed fund by Pacer Advisors that tracks the performance of the Pacer US Cash Cows 100 Index. It was launched on Dec 16, 2016. Both CAFG and COWZ are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: CAFG or COWZ.
Key characteristics
| CAFG | COWZ | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 2.35% | 9.57% |
| 1Y Return | 13.51% | 12.35% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 0.76 | 0.96 |
| Daily Std Dev | 19.67% | 14.20% |
| Max Drawdown | -16.63% | -38.63% |
| Current Drawdown | -4.14% | -2.44% |
Correlation
The correlation between CAFG and COWZ is 0.74, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
CAFG vs. COWZ - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, CAFG achieves a 2.35% return, which is significantly lower than COWZ's 9.57% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CAFG vs. COWZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
CAFG has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than COWZ's 0.49% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
CAFG vs. COWZ - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF (CAFG) and Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF (COWZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
CAFG vs. COWZ - Dividend Comparison
CAFG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.56%, less than COWZ's 2.03% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CAFG Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF | 0.56% | 0.39% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
COWZ Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF | 2.03% | 1.92% | 1.96% | 1.48% | 2.54% | 1.96% | 1.67% | 1.95% | 0.13% |
Drawdowns
CAFG vs. COWZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CAFG drawdown since its inception was -16.63%, smaller than the maximum COWZ drawdown of -38.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CAFG and COWZ. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
CAFG vs. COWZ - Volatility Comparison
Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF (CAFG) has a higher volatility of 7.21% compared to Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF (COWZ) at 4.66%. This indicates that CAFG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than COWZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.