PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CAFG vs. AVUV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CAFG vs. AVUV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF (CAFG) and Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF (AVUV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CAFG achieves a 25.78% return, which is significantly higher than AVUV's 17.96% return.


CAFG

1D
-0.38%
1M
4.31%
YTD
25.78%
6M
24.70%
1Y
31.67%
3Y*
14.49%
5Y*
10Y*

AVUV

1D
-0.97%
1M
1.21%
YTD
17.96%
6M
17.23%
1Y
36.48%
3Y*
19.24%
5Y*
10.71%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CAFG vs. AVUV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
CAFG
Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF
25.78%0.17%6.95%20.44%
AVUV
Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF
17.96%7.44%9.28%28.41%

Correlation

The correlation between CAFG and AVUV is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.82

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.85

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 3, 2023

0.85

The correlation between CAFG and AVUV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.

CAFG vs. AVUV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
CAFG
AVUV

Technology

30.8%
7.0%

Industrials

19.3%
13.9%

Healthcare

18.8%
4.2%

Energy

13.4%
18.2%

Consumer Cyclical

7.2%
18.0%

Communication Services

3.7%
2.8%

Consumer Defensive

3.0%
4.5%

Basic Materials

2.4%
4.9%

Utilities

1.4%
0.1%

Financial Services

-

25.8%

Real Estate

-

0.7%

Technology

CAFG
30.8%
AVUV
7.0%

Industrials

CAFG
19.3%
AVUV
13.9%

Healthcare

CAFG
18.8%
AVUV
4.2%

Energy

CAFG
13.4%
AVUV
18.2%

Consumer Cyclical

CAFG
7.2%
AVUV
18.0%

Communication Services

CAFG
3.7%
AVUV
2.8%

Consumer Defensive

CAFG
3.0%
AVUV
4.5%

Basic Materials

CAFG
2.4%
AVUV
4.9%

Utilities

CAFG
1.4%
AVUV
0.1%

Financial Services

CAFG

-

AVUV
25.8%

Real Estate

CAFG

-

AVUV
0.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CAFG vs. AVUV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CAFG
CAFG Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
CAFG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CAFG Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
CAFG Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
CAFG Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
CAFG Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

AVUV
AVUV Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
AVUV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AVUV Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
AVUV Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
AVUV Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
AVUV Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CAFG vs. AVUV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF (CAFG) and Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF (AVUV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CAFGAVUVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.26

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.38

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.36

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.91

4.61

-0.70

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.74

13.69

-0.96

CAFG vs. AVUV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CAFG Sharpe Ratio is 1.83, which is comparable to the AVUV Sharpe Ratio of 2.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CAFG and AVUV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CAFGAVUVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.83

2.10

-0.26

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.47

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.87

0.56

+0.31

Drawdowns

CAFG vs. AVUV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CAFG drawdown since its inception was -23.66%, smaller than the maximum AVUV drawdown of -49.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CAFG and AVUV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CAFGAVUVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.66%

-49.42%

+25.76%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.13%

-7.95%

-0.18%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.66%

-28.79%

+5.13%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.79%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.38%

-1.12%

+0.74%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.53%

-7.95%

+2.42%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.49%

2.67%

-0.18%

Volatility

CAFG vs. AVUV - Volatility Comparison

Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF (CAFG) has a higher volatility of 5.20% compared to Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF (AVUV) at 4.08%. This indicates that CAFG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AVUV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CAFGAVUVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.20%

4.08%

+1.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.75%

11.34%

+1.41%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.40%

17.54%

-0.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.58%

22.74%

-3.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.58%

28.30%

-8.72%

CAFG vs. AVUV - Expense Ratio Comparison

CAFG has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than AVUV's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

CAFG vs. AVUV - Dividend Comparison

CAFG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.27%, less than AVUV's 1.29% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
AVUV
Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF
1.29%1.58%1.61%1.65%1.74%1.28%1.21%0.38%
CAFG
Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF
0.27%0.35%0.36%0.39%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


CAFG and AVUV have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CAFG has higher volatility (5.20%) compared to AVUV (4.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CAFG dropped -23.66% vs AVUV's -49.42%.

On 3-year performance, AVUV leads with 19.24% vs 14.49% for CAFG. On fees, AVUV is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, AVUV has been the lower-risk option at 4.08%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, AVUV has performed better with a 19.24% return vs 14.49%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

AVUV is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for CAFG.

AVUV has the higher dividend yield at 1.29%, compared with 0.27% for CAFG.

CAFG is categorized as Small Cap Growth Equities, while AVUV is Small Cap Value Equities. They also come from different issuers: Pacer and Avantis. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for CAFG and 0.25% for AVUV.

AVUV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.10 vs 1.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CAFG and AVUV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer