CAFG vs. SFLO
Compare and contrast key facts about Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF (CAFG) and Victoryshares Small Cap Free Cash Flow ETF (SFLO).
CAFG and SFLO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. CAFG is a passively managed fund by Pacer that tracks the performance of the Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders Index - Benchmark TR Gross. It was launched on May 1, 2023. SFLO is a passively managed fund by VictoryShares that tracks the performance of the Victory US Small Cap Free Cash Flow Index. It was launched on Dec 20, 2023. Both CAFG and SFLO are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: CAFG or SFLO.
Correlation
The correlation between CAFG and SFLO is 0.64, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
CAFG vs. SFLO - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
CAFG:
-0.03
SFLO:
-0.41
CAFG:
0.12
SFLO:
-0.43
CAFG:
1.02
SFLO:
0.94
CAFG:
-0.03
SFLO:
-0.37
CAFG:
-0.09
SFLO:
-1.26
CAFG:
7.71%
SFLO:
7.92%
CAFG:
22.97%
SFLO:
24.45%
CAFG:
-23.66%
SFLO:
-26.63%
CAFG:
-16.78%
SFLO:
-18.35%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CAFG achieves a -9.63% return, which is significantly higher than SFLO's -12.94% return.
CAFG
-9.63%
-3.89%
-7.45%
-0.80%
N/A
N/A
SFLO
-12.94%
-8.07%
-11.71%
-10.50%
N/A
N/A
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CAFG vs. SFLO - Expense Ratio Comparison
CAFG has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than SFLO's 0.49% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
CAFG vs. SFLO — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
CAFG
SFLO
CAFG vs. SFLO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF (CAFG) and Victoryshares Small Cap Free Cash Flow ETF (SFLO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
CAFG vs. SFLO - Dividend Comparison
CAFG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.36%, less than SFLO's 1.57% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|
CAFG Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF | 0.36% | 0.36% | 0.39% |
SFLO Victoryshares Small Cap Free Cash Flow ETF | 1.57% | 1.28% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
CAFG vs. SFLO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CAFG drawdown since its inception was -23.66%, smaller than the maximum SFLO drawdown of -26.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CAFG and SFLO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
CAFG vs. SFLO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF (CAFG) is 13.50%, while Victoryshares Small Cap Free Cash Flow ETF (SFLO) has a volatility of 16.87%. This indicates that CAFG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SFLO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.