ATMP vs. AMNA

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

ATMP (Barclays ETN+ Select MLP ETN) and AMNA (ETRACS Alerian Midstream Energy Index ETN) are both MLPs funds - ATMP tracks the CIBC Atlas Select MLP VWAP while AMNA tracks the Alerian Midstream Energy Select Index. Both are passively managed. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ATMP charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for AMNA.

Performance

ATMP vs. AMNA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Barclays ETN+ Select MLP ETN (ATMP) and ETRACS Alerian Midstream Energy Index ETN (AMNA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

ATMP

• 1D: 0.07%
• 1M: -2.32%
• YTD: 20.02%
• 6M: 19.57%
• 1Y: 18.01%
• 3Y*: 21.17%
• 5Y*: 15.87%
• 10Y*: 4.90%

AMNA

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ATMP vs. AMNA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
ATMP Barclays ETN+ Select MLP ETN	20.02%	1.73%	31.66%	14.51%	20.71%	33.06%	0.86%
AMNA ETRACS Alerian Midstream Energy Index ETN	0.00%	0.00%	44.30%	12.50%	20.41%	36.44%	2.88%

Correlation

The correlation between ATMP and AMNA is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.56
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.74
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 23, 2020	0.79

The correlation between ATMP and AMNA shifts across timeframes, from 0.56 (3 years) to 0.79 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

ATMP vs. AMNA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ATMP

ATMP Risk / Return Rank: 39
ATMP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 36
ATMP Sortino Ratio Rank: 35
ATMP Omega Ratio Rank: 33
ATMP Calmar Ratio Rank: 51
ATMP Martin Ratio Rank: 38

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ATMP vs. AMNA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Barclays ETN+ Select MLP ETN (ATMP) and ETRACS Alerian Midstream Energy Index ETN (AMNA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ATMP	AMNA	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.31	—	—
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.87	—	—
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.23	—	—
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.51	—	—
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	6.16	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ATMP	AMNA	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.31	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.72	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.18	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.09	—	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	ATMP	AMNA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-80.86%	—	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.26%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.48%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-22.98%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-75.66%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.07%	—	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-31.15%	—	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.95%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	ATMP	AMNA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.61%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.72%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.00%	—	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.23%	—	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	27.68%	—	—

ATMP vs. AMNA - Expense Ratio Comparison

ATMP has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than AMNA's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

ATMP vs. AMNA - Dividend Comparison

Neither ATMP nor AMNA has paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
AMNA ETRACS Alerian Midstream Energy Index ETN	0.00%	0.00%	4.32%	5.61%	5.48%	5.84%	2.12%
ATMP Barclays ETN+ Select MLP ETN	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ATMP and AMNA in my portfolio?

ATMP and AMNA have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, ATMP or AMNA?

On fees, AMNA is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, ATMP or AMNA?

AMNA is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for ATMP.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ATMP or AMNA?

ATMP and AMNA have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between ATMP and AMNA?

ATMP tracks CIBC Atlas Select MLP VWAP, while AMNA tracks Alerian Midstream Energy Select Index. They also come from different issuers: Barclays Capital and UBS. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for ATMP and 0.75% for AMNA.