ATMP vs. AMNA

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Barclays ETN+ Select MLP ETN (ATMP) and ETRACS Alerian Midstream Energy Index ETN (AMNA).

ATMP and AMNA are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. ATMP is a passively managed fund by Barclays Capital that tracks the performance of the CIBC Atlas Select MLP VWAP. It was launched on Mar 13, 2013. AMNA is a passively managed fund by UBS that tracks the performance of the Alerian Midstream Energy Select Index. It was launched on Jun 19, 2020. Both ATMP and AMNA are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

ATMP vs. AMNA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Barclays ETN+ Select MLP ETN (ATMP) and ETRACS Alerian Midstream Energy Index ETN (AMNA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

ATMP vs. AMNA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
ATMP Barclays ETN+ Select MLP ETN	21.01%	6.99%	38.74%	21.58%	27.47%	41.34%	5.17%
AMNA ETRACS Alerian Midstream Energy Index ETN	0.00%	0.00%	44.30%	12.50%	20.41%	36.44%	2.88%

Returns By Period

ATMP

• 1D: -1.49%
• 1M: 2.80%
• YTD: 21.01%
• 6M: 22.57%
• 1Y: 18.18%
• 3Y*: 29.03%
• 5Y*: 26.63%
• 10Y*: 13.49%

AMNA

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ATMP vs. AMNA - Expense Ratio Comparison

ATMP has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than AMNA's 0.75% expense ratio.

ATMP

Barclays ETN+ Select MLP ETN

AMNA

ETRACS Alerian Midstream Energy Index ETN

Return for Risk

ATMP vs. AMNA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ATMP

ATMP Risk / Return Rank: 50
ATMP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 58
ATMP Sortino Ratio Rank: 51
ATMP Omega Ratio Rank: 57
ATMP Calmar Ratio Rank: 50
ATMP Martin Ratio Rank: 36

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ATMP vs. AMNA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Barclays ETN+ Select MLP ETN (ATMP) and ETRACS Alerian Midstream Energy Index ETN (AMNA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ATMP	AMNA	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.99	—	—
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.33	—	—
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.21	—	—
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.22	—	—
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	3.18	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ATMP	AMNA	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.99	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.21	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.49	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.30	—	—

Correlation

The correlation between ATMP and AMNA is 0.81, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

ATMP vs. AMNA - Dividend Comparison

ATMP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.51%, while AMNA has not paid dividends to shareholders.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ATMP Barclays ETN+ Select MLP ETN	4.51%	5.14%	4.72%	5.62%	5.50%	5.89%	8.71%	6.86%	6.51%	5.56%	5.47%	6.30%
AMNA ETRACS Alerian Midstream Energy Index ETN	0.00%	0.00%	4.32%	5.61%	5.48%	5.84%	2.12%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	ATMP	AMNA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-73.72%	—	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.11%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-22.98%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-70.30%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.41%	—	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-17.50%	—	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.80%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	ATMP	AMNA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.96%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.43%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.40%	—	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.06%	—	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	27.57%	—	—