ATMP vs. CLSE

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

ATMP (Barclays ETN+ Select MLP ETN) and CLSE (Convergence Long/Short Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ATMP is a MLPs fund tracking the CIBC Atlas Select MLP VWAP, while CLSE is a Long-Short fund actively managed by Convergence Investment Partners. ATMP is passively managed, while CLSE is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, ATMP returned 21.07%/yr vs 31.74%/yr for CLSE. At a 0.29 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ATMP charges 0.95%/yr vs 1.52%/yr for CLSE.

Performance

ATMP vs. CLSE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Barclays ETN+ Select MLP ETN (ATMP) and Convergence Long/Short Equity ETF (CLSE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ATMP achieves a 18.11% return, which is significantly lower than CLSE's 26.05% return.

ATMP

• 1D: 0.65%
• 1M: -7.19%
• YTD: 18.11%
• 6M: 18.98%
• 1Y: 17.21%
• 3Y*: 21.07%
• 5Y*: 15.35%
• 10Y*: 4.66%

CLSE

• 1D: 0.79%
• 1M: 4.52%
• YTD: 26.05%
• 6M: 25.23%
• 1Y: 51.69%
• 3Y*: 31.74%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ATMP vs. CLSE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
ATMP Barclays ETN+ Select MLP ETN	18.11%	1.73%	31.66%	14.51%	8.49%
CLSE Convergence Long/Short Equity ETF	26.05%	20.44%	35.54%	17.54%	-4.38%

Correlation

The correlation between ATMP and CLSE is -0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.03
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.19
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 22, 2022	0.29

The correlation between ATMP and CLSE shifts across timeframes, from -0.03 (1 year) to 0.29 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

ATMP vs. CLSE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ATMP

ATMP Risk / Return Rank: 36
ATMP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 35
ATMP Sortino Ratio Rank: 34
ATMP Omega Ratio Rank: 32
ATMP Calmar Ratio Rank: 43
ATMP Martin Ratio Rank: 35

CLSE

CLSE Risk / Return Rank: 96
CLSE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
CLSE Sortino Ratio Rank: 95
CLSE Omega Ratio Rank: 94
CLSE Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
CLSE Martin Ratio Rank: 97

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ATMP vs. CLSE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Barclays ETN+ Select MLP ETN (ATMP) and Convergence Long/Short Equity ETF (CLSE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ATMP	CLSE	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.22	3.82	-2.60
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.76	5.11	-3.35
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.21	1.67	-0.46
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.09	10.71	-8.62
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.25	38.98	-33.74

ATMP vs. CLSE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ATMP Sharpe Ratio is 1.22, which is lower than the CLSE Sharpe Ratio of 3.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ATMP and CLSE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

ATMP vs. CLSE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ATMP drawdown since its inception was -80.86%, which is greater than CLSE's maximum drawdown of -16.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ATMP and CLSE.

Drawdown Indicators

	ATMP	CLSE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-80.86%	-16.45%	-64.41%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.30%	-4.85%	-3.45%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.48%	-16.45%	-0.03%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-22.98%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-75.66%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.56%	-0.00%	-7.56%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-31.04%	-3.57%	-27.47%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.30%	1.33%	+1.97%

Volatility

ATMP vs. CLSE - Volatility Comparison

Barclays ETN+ Select MLP ETN (ATMP) has a higher volatility of 5.25% compared to Convergence Long/Short Equity ETF (CLSE) at 4.03%. This indicates that ATMP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CLSE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ATMP	CLSE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.25%	4.03%	+1.22%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.97%	10.52%	+0.45%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.27%	13.63%	+0.64%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.11%	13.91%	+8.20%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	27.68%	13.91%	+13.77%

ATMP vs. CLSE - Expense Ratio Comparison

ATMP has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than CLSE's 1.52% expense ratio.

Dividends

ATMP vs. CLSE - Dividend Comparison

ATMP has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CLSE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.76%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
ATMP Barclays ETN+ Select MLP ETN	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
CLSE Convergence Long/Short Equity ETF	0.76%	0.95%	0.93%	1.21%	0.85%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ATMP and CLSE in my portfolio?

ATMP and CLSE have a correlation of -0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ATMP or CLSE?

ATMP has higher volatility (5.25%) compared to CLSE (4.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ATMP dropped -80.86% vs CLSE's -16.45%.

Which ETF is better, ATMP or CLSE?

On 3-year performance, CLSE leads with 31.74% vs 21.07% for ATMP. On fees, ATMP is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, CLSE has been the lower-risk option at 4.03%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, ATMP or CLSE?

Over the 3-year period, CLSE has performed better with a 31.74% return vs 21.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, ATMP or CLSE?

ATMP is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.52% for CLSE.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ATMP or CLSE?

CLSE has the higher dividend yield at 0.76%, compared with 0.00% for ATMP.

What is the main difference between ATMP and CLSE?

ATMP is categorized as MLPs, while CLSE is Long-Short. They also come from different issuers: Barclays Capital and Convergence Investment Partners. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for ATMP and 1.52% for CLSE.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CLSE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.82 vs 1.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.