ATMP vs. CLSE
Compare and contrast key facts about Barclays ETN+ Select MLP ETN (ATMP) and Convergence Long/Short Equity ETF (CLSE).
ATMP and CLSE are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. ATMP is a passively managed fund by Barclays Capital that tracks the performance of the CIBC Atlas Select MLP VWAP. It was launched on Mar 13, 2013. CLSE is an actively managed fund by Convergence Investment Partners. It was launched on Feb 22, 2022.
Performance
ATMP vs. CLSE - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
ATMP vs. CLSE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ATMP Barclays ETN+ Select MLP ETN | 21.01% | 6.99% | 38.74% | 21.58% | 17.49% |
CLSE Convergence Long/Short Equity ETF | 2.96% | 20.44% | 35.54% | 17.54% | -3.04% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ATMP achieves a 21.01% return, which is significantly higher than CLSE's 2.96% return.
ATMP
- 1D
- -1.49%
- 1M
- 2.80%
- YTD
- 21.01%
- 6M
- 22.57%
- 1Y
- 18.18%
- 3Y*
- 29.03%
- 5Y*
- 26.63%
- 10Y*
- 13.49%
CLSE
- 1D
- 2.44%
- 1M
- -1.02%
- YTD
- 2.96%
- 6M
- 9.11%
- 1Y
- 31.47%
- 3Y*
- 24.16%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
ATMP vs. CLSE - Expense Ratio Comparison
ATMP has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than CLSE's 1.56% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
ATMP vs. CLSE — Risk / Return Rank
ATMP
CLSE
ATMP vs. CLSE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Barclays ETN+ Select MLP ETN (ATMP) and Convergence Long/Short Equity ETF (CLSE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ATMP | CLSE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.99 | 2.19 | -1.19 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.33 | 2.84 | -1.51 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.40 | -0.19 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.22 | 4.14 | -2.92 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.18 | 19.56 | -16.38 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ATMP | CLSE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.99 | 2.19 | -1.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.21 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.49 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.30 | 1.25 | -0.95 |
Correlation
The correlation between ATMP and CLSE is 0.33, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
ATMP vs. CLSE - Dividend Comparison
ATMP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.51%, more than CLSE's 0.92% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ATMP Barclays ETN+ Select MLP ETN | 4.51% | 5.14% | 4.72% | 5.62% | 5.50% | 5.89% | 8.71% | 6.86% | 6.51% | 5.56% | 5.47% | 6.30% |
CLSE Convergence Long/Short Equity ETF | 0.92% | 0.95% | 0.93% | 1.21% | 0.85% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
ATMP vs. CLSE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ATMP drawdown since its inception was -73.72%, which is greater than CLSE's maximum drawdown of -16.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ATMP and CLSE.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| ATMP | CLSE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -73.72% | -16.45% | -57.27% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.11% | -7.88% | -7.23% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.98% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -70.30% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.41% | -2.53% | +0.12% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.50% | -3.73% | -13.77% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.80% | 1.67% | +4.13% |
Volatility
ATMP vs. CLSE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Barclays ETN+ Select MLP ETN (ATMP) is 3.96%, while Convergence Long/Short Equity ETF (CLSE) has a volatility of 5.68%. This indicates that ATMP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CLSE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| ATMP | CLSE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.96% | 5.68% | -1.72% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.43% | 10.35% | -0.92% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.40% | 14.47% | +3.93% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.06% | 13.85% | +8.21% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.57% | 13.85% | +13.72% |