PortfoliosLab logo
ATMP vs. QLD
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between ATMP and QLD is 0.40, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

ATMP vs. QLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Barclays ETN+ Select MLP ETN (ATMP) and ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Daily Std Dev

ATMP:

16.14%

QLD:

49.83%

Max Drawdown

ATMP:

-0.71%

QLD:

-83.13%

Current Drawdown

ATMP:

0.00%

QLD:

-22.53%

Returns By Period


ATMP

YTD

N/A

1M

N/A

6M

N/A

1Y

N/A

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

QLD

YTD

-13.98%

1M

14.33%

6M

-15.77%

1Y

8.78%

5Y*

25.80%

10Y*

25.95%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


ATMP vs. QLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both ATMP and QLD have an expense ratio of 0.95%.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

ATMP vs. QLD — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ATMP
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of ATMP is 8585
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of ATMP is 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of ATMP is 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of ATMP is 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of ATMP is 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of ATMP is 8686
Martin Ratio Rank

QLD
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of QLD is 4444
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of QLD is 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of QLD is 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of QLD is 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of QLD is 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of QLD is 3838
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

ATMP vs. QLD - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Barclays ETN+ Select MLP ETN (ATMP) and ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.



Loading data...

Dividends

ATMP vs. QLD - Dividend Comparison

ATMP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.70%, more than QLD's 0.26% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
ATMP
Barclays ETN+ Select MLP ETN
4.70%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
QLD
ProShares Ultra QQQ
0.26%0.25%0.33%0.31%0.00%0.00%0.13%0.06%0.02%0.90%0.11%0.19%

Drawdowns

ATMP vs. QLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ATMP drawdown since its inception was -0.71%, smaller than the maximum QLD drawdown of -83.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ATMP and QLD. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

ATMP vs. QLD - Volatility Comparison


Loading data...