PortfoliosLab logo
AMNA vs. MLPR
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between AMNA and MLPR is 0.47, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

AMNA vs. MLPR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ETRACS Alerian Midstream Energy Index ETN (AMNA) and ETRACS Quarterly Pay 1.5x Leveraged Alerian MLP Index ETN (MLPR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Returns By Period


AMNA

YTD

N/A

1M

N/A

6M

N/A

1Y

N/A

3Y*

N/A

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

MLPR

YTD

8.72%

1M

4.87%

6M

11.37%

1Y

19.10%

3Y*

29.88%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


AMNA vs. MLPR - Expense Ratio Comparison

AMNA has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than MLPR's 0.95% expense ratio.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

AMNA vs. MLPR — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AMNA
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of AMNA is 9898
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of AMNA is 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of AMNA is 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of AMNA is 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of AMNA is 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of AMNA is 9898
Martin Ratio Rank

MLPR
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of MLPR is 6464
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of MLPR is 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of MLPR is 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of MLPR is 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of MLPR is 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of MLPR is 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

AMNA vs. MLPR - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ETRACS Alerian Midstream Energy Index ETN (AMNA) and ETRACS Quarterly Pay 1.5x Leveraged Alerian MLP Index ETN (MLPR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.



Loading data...

Dividends

AMNA vs. MLPR - Dividend Comparison

AMNA has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MLPR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.01%.


TTM20242023202220212020
AMNA
ETRACS Alerian Midstream Energy Index ETN
2.19%4.32%5.61%5.48%5.84%2.13%
MLPR
ETRACS Quarterly Pay 1.5x Leveraged Alerian MLP Index ETN
10.01%9.57%10.08%10.07%10.69%4.21%

Drawdowns

AMNA vs. MLPR - Drawdown Comparison


Loading data...

Volatility

AMNA vs. MLPR - Volatility Comparison


Loading data...