PortfoliosLab logo
AMNA vs. UMI
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between AMNA and UMI is 0.47, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


-0.50.00.51.0
Correlation: 0.5

Performance

AMNA vs. UMI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ETRACS Alerian Midstream Energy Index ETN (AMNA) and USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund ETF (UMI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

160.00%180.00%200.00%220.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
174.40%
197.85%
AMNA
UMI

Key characteristics

Returns By Period


AMNA

YTD

N/A

1M

N/A

6M

N/A

1Y

N/A

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

UMI

YTD

1.01%

1M

-4.23%

6M

8.22%

1Y

27.73%

5Y*

26.89%

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


AMNA vs. UMI - Expense Ratio Comparison

AMNA has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than UMI's 0.85% expense ratio.


Expense ratio chart for UMI: current value is 0.85%, compared with the broader market range of 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%
UMI: 0.85%
Expense ratio chart for AMNA: current value is 0.75%, compared with the broader market range of 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%
AMNA: 0.75%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

AMNA vs. UMI — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AMNA
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of AMNA is 9898
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of AMNA is 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of AMNA is 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of AMNA is 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of AMNA is 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of AMNA is 9898
Martin Ratio Rank

UMI
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of UMI is 8888
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of UMI is 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of UMI is 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of UMI is 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of UMI is 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of UMI is 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

AMNA vs. UMI - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ETRACS Alerian Midstream Energy Index ETN (AMNA) and USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund ETF (UMI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The chart of Sharpe ratio for AMNA, currently valued at 2.91, compared to the broader market-1.000.001.002.003.004.00
AMNA: 2.91
UMI: 1.42
The chart of Sortino ratio for AMNA, currently valued at 4.23, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.00
AMNA: 4.23
UMI: 1.80
The chart of Omega ratio for AMNA, currently valued at 1.74, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.50
AMNA: 1.74
UMI: 1.28
The chart of Calmar ratio for AMNA, currently valued at 6.23, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.00
AMNA: 6.23
UMI: 1.69
The chart of Martin ratio for AMNA, currently valued at 9.87, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.00
AMNA: 9.87
UMI: 6.24


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio1.002.003.004.00NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
2.91
1.42
AMNA
UMI

Dividends

AMNA vs. UMI - Dividend Comparison

AMNA has not paid dividends to shareholders, while UMI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.00%.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017
AMNA
ETRACS Alerian Midstream Energy Index ETN
2.19%4.32%5.61%5.48%5.84%2.13%0.00%0.00%0.00%
UMI
USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund ETF
4.00%4.39%4.67%4.78%3.37%2.18%2.47%2.48%0.15%

Drawdowns

AMNA vs. UMI - Drawdown Comparison


-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
-5.20%
-8.56%
AMNA
UMI

Volatility

AMNA vs. UMI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ETRACS Alerian Midstream Energy Index ETN (AMNA) is 0.00%, while USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund ETF (UMI) has a volatility of 13.03%. This indicates that AMNA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UMI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


0.00%2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%14.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril0
13.03%
AMNA
UMI