ATMP vs. GSIB

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Barclays ETN+ Select MLP ETN (ATMP) and Themes Global Systemically Important Banks ETF (GSIB).

ATMP and GSIB are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. ATMP is a passively managed fund by Barclays Capital that tracks the performance of the CIBC Atlas Select MLP VWAP. It was launched on Mar 13, 2013. GSIB is an actively managed fund by Themes. It was launched on Dec 14, 2023.

Performance

ATMP vs. GSIB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Barclays ETN+ Select MLP ETN (ATMP) and Themes Global Systemically Important Banks ETF (GSIB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

ATMP vs. GSIB - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
ATMP Barclays ETN+ Select MLP ETN	21.01%	6.99%	38.74%	1.43%
GSIB Themes Global Systemically Important Banks ETF	-3.15%	61.67%	32.86%	2.35%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ATMP achieves a 21.01% return, which is significantly higher than GSIB's -3.15% return.

ATMP

• 1D: -1.49%
• 1M: 2.80%
• YTD: 21.01%
• 6M: 22.57%
• 1Y: 18.18%
• 3Y*: 29.03%
• 5Y*: 26.63%
• 10Y*: 13.49%

GSIB

• 1D: 4.01%
• 1M: -4.96%
• YTD: -3.15%
• 6M: 7.71%
• 1Y: 36.96%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ATMP vs. GSIB - Expense Ratio Comparison

ATMP has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than GSIB's 0.35% expense ratio.

ATMP

Barclays ETN+ Select MLP ETN

GSIB

Themes Global Systemically Important Banks ETF

Return for Risk

ATMP vs. GSIB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ATMP

ATMP Risk / Return Rank: 50
ATMP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 58
ATMP Sortino Ratio Rank: 51
ATMP Omega Ratio Rank: 57
ATMP Calmar Ratio Rank: 50
ATMP Martin Ratio Rank: 36

GSIB

GSIB Risk / Return Rank: 86
GSIB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
GSIB Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
GSIB Omega Ratio Rank: 86
GSIB Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
GSIB Martin Ratio Rank: 82

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ATMP vs. GSIB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Barclays ETN+ Select MLP ETN (ATMP) and Themes Global Systemically Important Banks ETF (GSIB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ATMP	GSIB	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.99	1.79	-0.79
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.33	2.39	-1.06
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.21	1.34	-0.13
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.22	2.51	-1.29
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	3.18	8.62	-5.44
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ATMP vs. GSIB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ATMP Sharpe Ratio is 0.99, which is lower than the GSIB Sharpe Ratio of 1.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ATMP and GSIB, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ATMP	GSIB	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.99	1.79	-0.79
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.21	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.49	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.30	2.15	-1.85

Correlation

The correlation between ATMP and GSIB is 0.36, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

ATMP vs. GSIB - Dividend Comparison

ATMP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.51%, more than GSIB's 1.97% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ATMP Barclays ETN+ Select MLP ETN	4.51%	5.14%	4.72%	5.62%	5.50%	5.89%	8.71%	6.86%	6.51%	5.56%	5.47%	6.30%
GSIB Themes Global Systemically Important Banks ETF	1.97%	1.91%	1.67%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

ATMP vs. GSIB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ATMP drawdown since its inception was -73.72%, which is greater than GSIB's maximum drawdown of -17.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ATMP and GSIB.

Drawdown Indicators

	ATMP	GSIB	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-73.72%	-17.71%	-56.01%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.11%	-14.59%	-0.52%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-22.98%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-70.30%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.41%	-9.87%	+7.46%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-17.50%	-2.06%	-15.44%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.80%	4.25%	+1.55%

Volatility

ATMP vs. GSIB - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Barclays ETN+ Select MLP ETN (ATMP) is 3.96%, while Themes Global Systemically Important Banks ETF (GSIB) has a volatility of 7.69%. This indicates that ATMP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GSIB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ATMP	GSIB	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.96%	7.69%	-3.73%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.43%	13.05%	-3.62%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.40%	20.79%	-2.39%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.06%	18.39%	+3.67%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	27.57%	18.39%	+9.18%