ATMP vs. GSIB
Compare and contrast key facts about Barclays ETN+ Select MLP ETN (ATMP) and Themes Global Systemically Important Banks ETF (GSIB).
ATMP and GSIB are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. ATMP is a passively managed fund by Barclays Capital that tracks the performance of the CIBC Atlas Select MLP VWAP. It was launched on Mar 13, 2013. GSIB is an actively managed fund by Themes. It was launched on Dec 14, 2023.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: ATMP or GSIB.
Correlation
The correlation between ATMP and GSIB is 0.44, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
ATMP vs. GSIB - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
ATMP:
1.33
GSIB:
1.75
ATMP:
1.71
GSIB:
2.30
ATMP:
1.26
GSIB:
1.33
ATMP:
1.76
GSIB:
2.13
ATMP:
6.94
GSIB:
10.27
ATMP:
3.96%
GSIB:
3.68%
ATMP:
20.67%
GSIB:
21.63%
ATMP:
-72.93%
GSIB:
-17.71%
ATMP:
-6.90%
GSIB:
-4.73%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ATMP achieves a 4.29% return, which is significantly lower than GSIB's 13.28% return.
ATMP
4.29%
-5.13%
11.39%
26.31%
32.80%
7.01%
GSIB
13.28%
-4.73%
18.38%
36.83%
N/A
N/A
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
ATMP vs. GSIB - Expense Ratio Comparison
ATMP has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than GSIB's 0.35% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
ATMP vs. GSIB — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
ATMP
GSIB
ATMP vs. GSIB - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Barclays ETN+ Select MLP ETN (ATMP) and Themes Global Systemically Important Banks ETF (GSIB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
ATMP vs. GSIB - Dividend Comparison
ATMP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.60%, more than GSIB's 1.47% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ATMP Barclays ETN+ Select MLP ETN | 4.60% | 4.72% | 5.62% | 5.50% | 8.75% | 14.62% | 8.48% | 6.51% | 5.56% | 5.47% | 8.02% | 3.56% |
GSIB Themes Global Systemically Important Banks ETF | 1.47% | 1.67% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
ATMP vs. GSIB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ATMP drawdown since its inception was -72.93%, which is greater than GSIB's maximum drawdown of -17.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ATMP and GSIB. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
ATMP vs. GSIB - Volatility Comparison
Barclays ETN+ Select MLP ETN (ATMP) and Themes Global Systemically Important Banks ETF (GSIB) have volatilities of 13.47% and 14.10%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.