ATMP vs. MLPX
Compare and contrast key facts about Barclays ETN+ Select MLP ETN (ATMP) and Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF (MLPX).
ATMP and MLPX are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. ATMP is a passively managed fund by Barclays Capital that tracks the performance of the CIBC Atlas Select MLP VWAP. It was launched on Mar 13, 2013. MLPX is a passively managed fund by Global X that tracks the performance of the Solactive MLP & Energy Infrastructure Index. It was launched on Aug 7, 2013. Both ATMP and MLPX are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: ATMP or MLPX.
Key characteristics
| ATMP | MLPX | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 36.34% | 43.10% |
| 1Y Return | 40.11% | 49.71% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 25.79% | 23.90% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 20.52% | 19.52% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 6.16% | 6.28% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 3.08 | 3.63 |
| Sortino Ratio | 4.18 | 4.90 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.54 | 1.62 |
| Calmar Ratio | 6.06 | 7.89 |
| Martin Ratio | 19.92 | 28.55 |
| Ulcer Index | 2.05% | 1.77% |
| Daily Std Dev | 13.28% | 13.89% |
| Max Drawdown | -72.92% | -70.59% |
| Current Drawdown | -1.02% | -0.72% |
Correlation
The correlation between ATMP and MLPX is 0.90, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
ATMP vs. MLPX - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, ATMP achieves a 36.34% return, which is significantly lower than MLPX's 43.10% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with ATMP having a 6.16% annualized return and MLPX not far ahead at 6.28%. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
ATMP vs. MLPX - Expense Ratio Comparison
ATMP has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than MLPX's 0.45% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
ATMP vs. MLPX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Barclays ETN+ Select MLP ETN (ATMP) and Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF (MLPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
ATMP vs. MLPX - Dividend Comparison
ATMP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.59%, more than MLPX's 4.20% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ATMP Barclays ETN+ Select MLP ETN | 4.59% | 5.62% | 5.50% | 8.75% | 14.62% | 8.48% | 6.51% | 5.56% | 5.47% | 8.02% | 3.56% | 2.89% |
MLPX Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF | 4.20% | 5.22% | 5.23% | 5.98% | 8.33% | 5.78% | 5.98% | 4.37% | 5.52% | 4.82% | 2.16% | 0.67% |
Drawdowns
ATMP vs. MLPX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ATMP drawdown since its inception was -72.92%, roughly equal to the maximum MLPX drawdown of -70.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ATMP and MLPX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
ATMP vs. MLPX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Barclays ETN+ Select MLP ETN (ATMP) is 4.42%, while Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF (MLPX) has a volatility of 4.71%. This indicates that ATMP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MLPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.