ATMP vs. MLPR
Compare and contrast key facts about Barclays ETN+ Select MLP ETN (ATMP) and ETRACS Quarterly Pay 1.5x Leveraged Alerian MLP Index ETN (MLPR).
ATMP and MLPR are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. ATMP is a passively managed fund by Barclays Capital that tracks the performance of the CIBC Atlas Select MLP VWAP. It was launched on Mar 13, 2013. MLPR is a passively managed fund by UBS that tracks the performance of the Alerian MLP Index (150%). It was launched on Jun 2, 2020. Both ATMP and MLPR are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: ATMP or MLPR.
Correlation
The correlation between ATMP and MLPR is 0.92, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
ATMP vs. MLPR - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
ATMP:
2.68
MLPR:
1.26
ATMP:
3.57
MLPR:
1.81
ATMP:
1.47
MLPR:
1.22
ATMP:
3.96
MLPR:
2.11
ATMP:
17.72
MLPR:
6.66
ATMP:
2.15%
MLPR:
4.28%
ATMP:
14.21%
MLPR:
22.69%
ATMP:
-72.93%
MLPR:
-48.98%
ATMP:
-7.92%
MLPR:
-12.17%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ATMP achieves a 36.77% return, which is significantly higher than MLPR's 28.81% return.
ATMP
36.77%
-3.33%
16.92%
37.62%
18.80%
6.33%
MLPR
28.81%
-3.75%
7.44%
27.86%
N/A
N/A
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
ATMP vs. MLPR - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both ATMP and MLPR have an expense ratio of 0.95%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
ATMP vs. MLPR - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Barclays ETN+ Select MLP ETN (ATMP) and ETRACS Quarterly Pay 1.5x Leveraged Alerian MLP Index ETN (MLPR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
ATMP vs. MLPR - Dividend Comparison
ATMP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.79%, less than MLPR's 9.78% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ATMP Barclays ETN+ Select MLP ETN | 4.79% | 5.62% | 5.50% | 8.75% | 14.62% | 8.48% | 6.51% | 5.56% | 5.47% | 8.02% | 3.56% | 2.89% |
MLPR ETRACS Quarterly Pay 1.5x Leveraged Alerian MLP Index ETN | 9.78% | 10.08% | 10.07% | 10.69% | 4.21% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
ATMP vs. MLPR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ATMP drawdown since its inception was -72.93%, which is greater than MLPR's maximum drawdown of -48.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ATMP and MLPR. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
ATMP vs. MLPR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Barclays ETN+ Select MLP ETN (ATMP) is 6.49%, while ETRACS Quarterly Pay 1.5x Leveraged Alerian MLP Index ETN (MLPR) has a volatility of 10.24%. This indicates that ATMP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MLPR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.