AMNA vs. FALN
Compare and contrast key facts about ETRACS Alerian Midstream Energy Index ETN (AMNA) and iShares Fallen Angels USD Bond ETF (FALN).
AMNA and FALN are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. AMNA is a passively managed fund by UBS that tracks the performance of the Alerian Midstream Energy Select Index. It was launched on Jun 19, 2020. FALN is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg US High Yield Fallen Angel 3% Capped Index. It was launched on Jun 14, 2016. Both AMNA and FALN are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: AMNA or FALN.
Correlation
The correlation between AMNA and FALN is 0.38, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
AMNA vs. FALN - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
Returns By Period
AMNA
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
FALN
1.36%
0.31%
2.18%
8.12%
4.82%
N/A
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
AMNA vs. FALN - Expense Ratio Comparison
AMNA has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than FALN's 0.25% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
AMNA vs. FALN — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
AMNA
FALN
AMNA vs. FALN - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ETRACS Alerian Midstream Energy Index ETN (AMNA) and iShares Fallen Angels USD Bond ETF (FALN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
AMNA vs. FALN - Dividend Comparison
AMNA has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FALN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.26%.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMNA ETRACS Alerian Midstream Energy Index ETN | 3.27% | 4.32% | 5.61% | 5.48% | 5.84% | 2.13% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FALN iShares Fallen Angels USD Bond ETF | 6.26% | 6.23% | 5.38% | 5.08% | 3.39% | 5.14% | 5.35% | 5.97% | 6.99% | 3.54% |
Drawdowns
AMNA vs. FALN - Drawdown Comparison
Volatility
AMNA vs. FALN - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ETRACS Alerian Midstream Energy Index ETN (AMNA) is 0.00%, while iShares Fallen Angels USD Bond ETF (FALN) has a volatility of 1.10%. This indicates that AMNA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FALN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.