ATMP vs. ENFR
Compare and contrast key facts about Barclays ETN+ Select MLP ETN (ATMP) and Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF (ENFR).
ATMP and ENFR are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. ATMP is a passively managed fund by Barclays Capital that tracks the performance of the CIBC Atlas Select MLP VWAP. It was launched on Mar 13, 2013. ENFR is a passively managed fund by SS&C that tracks the performance of the Alerian Midstream Energy Select Index. It was launched on Nov 1, 2013. Both ATMP and ENFR are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: ATMP or ENFR.
Correlation
The correlation between ATMP and ENFR is 0.88, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
ATMP vs. ENFR - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
ATMP:
2.48
ENFR:
2.80
ATMP:
3.32
ENFR:
3.72
ATMP:
1.44
ENFR:
1.49
ATMP:
3.64
ENFR:
3.84
ATMP:
16.78
ENFR:
20.37
ATMP:
2.09%
ENFR:
1.87%
ATMP:
14.15%
ENFR:
13.58%
ATMP:
-72.93%
ENFR:
-68.28%
ATMP:
-9.39%
ENFR:
-9.24%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ATMP achieves a 34.59% return, which is significantly lower than ENFR's 37.15% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with ATMP having a 6.39% annualized return and ENFR not far behind at 6.11%.
ATMP
34.59%
-5.13%
14.69%
35.93%
18.43%
6.39%
ENFR
37.15%
-6.39%
18.42%
38.83%
14.83%
6.11%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
ATMP vs. ENFR - Expense Ratio Comparison
ATMP has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than ENFR's 0.35% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
ATMP vs. ENFR - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Barclays ETN+ Select MLP ETN (ATMP) and Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF (ENFR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
ATMP vs. ENFR - Dividend Comparison
ATMP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.87%, more than ENFR's 4.57% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ATMP Barclays ETN+ Select MLP ETN | 4.87% | 5.62% | 5.50% | 8.75% | 14.62% | 8.48% | 6.51% | 5.56% | 5.47% | 8.02% | 3.56% | 2.89% |
ENFR Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF | 4.57% | 5.48% | 5.22% | 7.86% | 7.58% | 5.82% | 3.98% | 2.98% | 3.31% | 3.34% | 2.15% | 0.26% |
Drawdowns
ATMP vs. ENFR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ATMP drawdown since its inception was -72.93%, which is greater than ENFR's maximum drawdown of -68.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ATMP and ENFR. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
ATMP vs. ENFR - Volatility Comparison
Barclays ETN+ Select MLP ETN (ATMP) and Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF (ENFR) have volatilities of 6.22% and 6.30%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.