ATMP vs. ENFR
ATMP (Barclays ETN+ Select MLP ETN) and ENFR (Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ATMP is a MLPs fund tracking the CIBC Atlas Select MLP VWAP, while ENFR is a Energy Equities fund tracking the Alerian Midstream Energy Select Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, ATMP returned 4.66%/yr vs 11.81%/yr for ENFR. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. ATMP charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for ENFR.
Performance
ATMP vs. ENFR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ATMP achieves a 18.11% return, which is significantly lower than ENFR's 23.07% return. Over the past 10 years, ATMP has underperformed ENFR with an annualized return of 4.66%, while ENFR has yielded a comparatively higher 11.81% annualized return.
ATMP
- 1D
- 0.65%
- 1M
- -7.19%
- YTD
- 18.11%
- 6M
- 18.98%
- 1Y
- 17.21%
- 3Y*
- 21.07%
- 5Y*
- 15.35%
- 10Y*
- 4.66%
ENFR
- 1D
- 1.01%
- 1M
- -5.94%
- YTD
- 23.07%
- 6M
- 24.76%
- 1Y
- 24.84%
- 3Y*
- 28.26%
- 5Y*
- 19.69%
- 10Y*
- 11.81%
ATMP vs. ENFR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ATMP Barclays ETN+ Select MLP ETN | 18.11% | 1.73% | 31.66% | 14.51% | 20.71% | 33.06% | -34.39% | 0.39% | -14.55% | -11.89% |
ENFR Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF | 23.07% | 5.88% | 42.17% | 15.63% | 17.48% | 39.97% | -24.14% | 21.60% | -18.67% | -0.19% |
Correlation
The correlation between ATMP and ENFR is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 1, 2013 | 0.88 |
The correlation between ATMP and ENFR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ATMP vs. ENFR — Risk / Return Rank
ATMP
ENFR
ATMP vs. ENFR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Barclays ETN+ Select MLP ETN (ATMP) and Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF (ENFR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ATMP | ENFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.47 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.59 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.29 | -0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.09 | 2.89 | -0.79 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.25 | 7.40 | -2.15 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ATMP vs. ENFR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ATMP drawdown since its inception was -80.86%, which is greater than ENFR's maximum drawdown of -68.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ATMP and ENFR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ATMP | ENFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -80.86% | -68.28% | -12.58% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.30% | -8.64% | +0.34% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.48% | -15.58% | -0.90% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.98% | -20.29% | -2.69% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -75.66% | -62.64% | -13.02% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.56% | -6.12% | -1.44% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -31.04% | -15.94% | -15.10% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.30% | 3.36% | -0.06% |
Volatility
ATMP vs. ENFR - Volatility Comparison
Barclays ETN+ Select MLP ETN (ATMP) and Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF (ENFR) have volatilities of 5.25% and 5.42%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ATMP | ENFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.25% | 5.42% | -0.17% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.97% | 11.57% | -0.60% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.27% | 14.82% | -0.55% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.11% | 19.24% | +2.87% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.68% | 24.68% | +3.00% |
ATMP vs. ENFR - Expense Ratio Comparison
ATMP has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than ENFR's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
ATMP vs. ENFR - Dividend Comparison
ATMP has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ENFR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.08%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ATMP Barclays ETN+ Select MLP ETN | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ENFR Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF | 4.08% | 4.77% | 4.41% | 5.48% | 5.23% | 7.86% | 7.57% | 5.81% | 3.98% | 2.98% | 3.31% | 3.34% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.94, ATMP and ENFR move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
ENFR has higher volatility (5.42%) compared to ATMP (5.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ATMP dropped -80.86% vs ENFR's -68.28%.
On 10-year performance, ENFR leads with 11.81% vs 4.66% for ATMP. On fees, ENFR is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, ATMP has been the lower-risk option at 5.25%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, ENFR has performed better with a 11.81% return vs 4.66%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ENFR is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for ATMP.
ENFR has the higher dividend yield at 4.08%, compared with 0.00% for ATMP.
ATMP is categorized as MLPs, while ENFR is Energy Equities. ATMP tracks CIBC Atlas Select MLP VWAP, while ENFR tracks Alerian Midstream Energy Select Index. They also come from different issuers: Barclays Capital and SS&C. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for ATMP and 0.35% for ENFR.
ENFR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.69 vs 1.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ATMP and ENFR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer