PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
ATMP vs. ENFR
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Key characteristics


ATMPENFR
YTD Return36.34%41.59%
1Y Return40.11%48.51%
3Y Return (Ann)25.79%22.28%
5Y Return (Ann)20.52%17.03%
10Y Return (Ann)6.16%5.88%
Sharpe Ratio3.083.86
Sortino Ratio4.185.26
Omega Ratio1.541.68
Calmar Ratio6.069.04
Martin Ratio19.9231.92
Ulcer Index2.05%1.54%
Daily Std Dev13.28%12.76%
Max Drawdown-72.92%-68.28%
Current Drawdown-1.02%-0.82%

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.9

The correlation between ATMP and ENFR is 0.88, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Performance

ATMP vs. ENFR - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, ATMP achieves a 36.34% return, which is significantly lower than ENFR's 41.59% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with ATMP having a 6.16% annualized return and ENFR not far behind at 5.88%. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


0.00%5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
16.48%
22.69%
ATMP
ENFR

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


ATMP vs. ENFR - Expense Ratio Comparison

ATMP has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than ENFR's 0.35% expense ratio.


ATMP
Barclays ETN+ Select MLP ETN
Expense ratio chart for ATMP: current value at 0.95% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.95%
Expense ratio chart for ENFR: current value at 0.35% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.35%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

ATMP vs. ENFR - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Barclays ETN+ Select MLP ETN (ATMP) and Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF (ENFR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ATMP
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for ATMP, currently valued at 3.08, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.003.08
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for ATMP, currently valued at 4.18, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.004.18
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for ATMP, currently valued at 1.54, compared to the broader market1.001.502.002.503.001.54
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for ATMP, currently valued at 6.06, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.006.06
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for ATMP, currently valued at 19.92, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.00120.0019.92
ENFR
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for ENFR, currently valued at 3.86, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.003.86
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for ENFR, currently valued at 5.26, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.005.26
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for ENFR, currently valued at 1.68, compared to the broader market1.001.502.002.503.001.68
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for ENFR, currently valued at 9.04, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.009.04
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for ENFR, currently valued at 31.91, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.00120.0031.92

ATMP vs. ENFR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ATMP Sharpe Ratio is 3.08, which is comparable to the ENFR Sharpe Ratio of 3.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ATMP and ENFR, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio2.002.503.003.504.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
3.08
3.86
ATMP
ENFR

Dividends

ATMP vs. ENFR - Dividend Comparison

ATMP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.59%, more than ENFR's 3.27% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
ATMP
Barclays ETN+ Select MLP ETN
4.59%5.62%5.50%8.75%14.62%8.48%6.51%5.56%5.47%8.02%3.56%2.89%
ENFR
Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF
3.27%5.48%5.22%7.86%7.58%5.82%3.98%2.98%3.31%3.34%2.15%0.26%

Drawdowns

ATMP vs. ENFR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ATMP drawdown since its inception was -72.92%, which is greater than ENFR's maximum drawdown of -68.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ATMP and ENFR. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-7.00%-6.00%-5.00%-4.00%-3.00%-2.00%-1.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-1.02%
-0.82%
ATMP
ENFR

Volatility

ATMP vs. ENFR - Volatility Comparison

Barclays ETN+ Select MLP ETN (ATMP) has a higher volatility of 4.42% compared to Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF (ENFR) at 4.15%. This indicates that ATMP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ENFR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
4.42%
4.15%
ATMP
ENFR