ATMP vs. AMZA
ATMP (Barclays ETN+ Select MLP ETN) and AMZA (InfraCap MLP ETF) are both MLPs funds. ATMP is passively managed, while AMZA is actively managed. Over the past 10 years, ATMP returned 5.16%/yr vs 5.46%/yr for AMZA. Their correlation of 0.89 means they have usually moved in the same direction. ATMP charges 0.95%/yr vs 2.01%/yr for AMZA.
Performance
ATMP vs. AMZA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ATMP achieves a 26.22% return, which is significantly lower than AMZA's 30.46% return. Over the past 10 years, ATMP has underperformed AMZA with an annualized return of 5.16%, while AMZA has yielded a comparatively higher 5.46% annualized return.
ATMP
- 1D
- 0.87%
- 1M
- 5.19%
- 6M
- 17.51%
- YTD
- 26.22%
- 1Y
- 23.85%
- 3Y*
- 20.30%
- 5Y*
- 18.49%
- 10Y*
- 5.16%
- ALL TIME*
- 2.84%
AMZA
- 1D
- 0.65%
- 1M
- 5.94%
- 6M
- 21.61%
- YTD
- 30.46%
- 1Y
- 23.26%
- 3Y*
- 22.79%
- 5Y*
- 22.88%
- 10Y*
- 5.46%
- ALL TIME*
- -0.35%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
AMZA InfraCap MLP ETF | $1.66M | $1.65M | $1.75M |
| $521.25K | $462.49K | $511.48K |
ATMP vs. AMZA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ATMP Barclays ETN+ Select MLP ETN | 26.22% | 1.73% | 31.66% | 14.51% | 20.71% | 33.06% | -34.39% | 0.39% | -14.55% | -11.89% |
AMZA InfraCap MLP ETF | 30.46% | 0.17% | 30.90% | 23.35% | 33.20% | 51.22% | -49.25% | 6.27% | -26.78% | -6.90% |
Correlation
The correlation between ATMP and AMZA is 0.83, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.83 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.85 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.86 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.89 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2014 | 0.89 |
The correlation between ATMP and AMZA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ATMP vs. AMZA — Risk / Return Rank
ATMP
AMZA
ATMP vs. AMZA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Barclays ETN+ Select MLP ETN (ATMP) and InfraCap MLP ETF (AMZA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ATMP | AMZA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.40 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.53 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.21 | +0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.81 | 1.85 | +0.97 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.57 | 4.51 | +2.06 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ATMP vs. AMZA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ATMP drawdown since its inception was -80.86%, smaller than the maximum AMZA drawdown of -91.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ATMP and AMZA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ATMP | AMZA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -80.86% | -91.46% | +10.60% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.30% | -11.84% | +3.54% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.48% | -18.56% | +2.08% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.98% | -25.15% | +2.17% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -75.66% | -86.84% | +11.18% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.27% | -4.13% | +2.86% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -30.81% | -44.51% | +13.70% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.54% | 5.02% | -1.48% |
Volatility
ATMP vs. AMZA - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Barclays ETN+ Select MLP ETN (ATMP) is 5.01%, while InfraCap MLP ETF (AMZA) has a volatility of 5.43%. This indicates that ATMP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AMZA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ATMP | AMZA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.01% | 5.43% | -0.42% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.75% | 14.17% | -2.42% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.57% | 18.20% | -3.63% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.94% | 25.27% | -3.33% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.62% | 37.14% | -9.52% |
ATMP vs. AMZA - Expense Ratio Comparison
ATMP has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than AMZA's 2.01% expense ratio.
Dividends
ATMP vs. AMZA - Dividend Comparison
ATMP has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AMZA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.83%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMZA InfraCap MLP ETF | 7.83% | 8.81% | 7.29% | 9.40% | 7.65% | 10.24% | 22.13% | 19.47% | 34.46% | 24.16% | 18.36% | 18.21% |
ATMP Barclays ETN+ Select MLP ETN | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ATMP and AMZA have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AMZA has higher volatility (5.43%) compared to ATMP (5.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ATMP dropped -80.86% vs AMZA's -91.46%.
On 10-year performance, AMZA leads with 5.46% vs 5.16% for ATMP. On fees, ATMP is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, ATMP has been the lower-risk option at 5.01%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, AMZA has performed better with a 5.46% return vs 5.16%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ATMP is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 2.01% for AMZA.
AMZA has the higher dividend yield at 7.83%, compared with 0.00% for ATMP.
They also come from different issuers: Barclays Capital and Virtus. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for ATMP and 2.01% for AMZA.
ATMP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.60 vs 1.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ATMP and AMZA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer