AMBA vs. LNG

Last updated Jul 11, 2026

AMBA (Ambarella, Inc.) and LNG (Cheniere Energy, Inc.) are both stocks. AMBA operates in Semiconductor Equipment & Materials (Technology), while LNG operates in Oil & Gas Midstream (Energy). Over the past 10 years, AMBA returned 3.49%/yr vs 21.39%/yr for LNG. At a 0.23 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

AMBA vs. LNG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Ambarella, Inc. (AMBA) and Cheniere Energy, Inc. (LNG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AMBA achieves a 9.12% return, which is significantly lower than LNG's 33.71% return. Over the past 10 years, AMBA has underperformed LNG with an annualized return of 3.49%, while LNG has yielded a comparatively higher 21.39% annualized return.

AMBA

• 1D: -1.38%
• 1M: 17.48%
• 6M: 11.62%
• YTD: 9.12%
• 1Y: 15.58%
• 3Y*: -1.42%
• 5Y*: -5.30%
• 10Y*: 3.49%

LNG

• 1D: -1.01%
• 1M: 7.70%
• 6M: 33.86%
• YTD: 33.71%
• 1Y: 11.03%
• 3Y*: 18.92%
• 5Y*: 25.25%
• 10Y*: 21.39%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AMBA vs. LNG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
AMBA Ambarella, Inc.	9.12%	-2.61%	18.68%	-25.47%	-59.47%	120.96%	51.62%	73.13%	-40.46%	8.54%
LNG Cheniere Energy, Inc.	33.71%	-8.70%	27.18%	15.02%	49.30%	69.48%	-1.70%	3.18%	9.94%	29.95%

Correlation

The correlation between AMBA and LNG is -0.13, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.13
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.05
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.13
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.21
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 10, 2012	0.23

The correlation between AMBA and LNG shifts across timeframes, from -0.13 (1 year) to 0.23 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap AMBA : $3.39B LNG : $54.20B
EPS AMBA : -$1.62 LNG : $6.86
PS Ratio AMBA : 8.19 LNG : 2.74
PB Ratio AMBA : 5.56 LNG : 14.50
Total Revenue (TTM) AMBA : $405.19M LNG : $20.28B
Gross Profit (TTM) AMBA : $238.32M LNG : $5.52B
EBITDA (TTM) AMBA : -$69.43M LNG : $5.81B

Return for Risk

AMBA vs. LNG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AMBA

AMBA Risk / Return Rank: 54
AMBA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 53
AMBA Sortino Ratio Rank: 54
AMBA Omega Ratio Rank: 56
AMBA Calmar Ratio Rank: 53
AMBA Martin Ratio Rank: 53

LNG

LNG Risk / Return Rank: 56
LNG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 60
LNG Sortino Ratio Rank: 54
LNG Omega Ratio Rank: 53
LNG Calmar Ratio Rank: 57
LNG Martin Ratio Rank: 56

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AMBA vs. LNG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ambarella, Inc. (AMBA) and Cheniere Energy, Inc. (LNG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	AMBA	LNG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.20	0.42	-0.22
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.80	0.79	0.00
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.11	1.10	+0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.30	0.48	-0.18
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.59	0.90	-0.30

AMBA vs. LNG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AMBA Sharpe Ratio is 0.20, which is lower than the LNG Sharpe Ratio of 0.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AMBA and LNG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

AMBA vs. LNG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AMBA drawdown since its inception was -81.65%, smaller than the maximum LNG drawdown of -97.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMBA and LNG.

Drawdown Indicators

	AMBA	LNG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-81.65%	-97.84%	+16.19%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-49.06%	-24.09%	-24.97%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-52.74%	-24.87%	-27.87%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-81.65%	-24.87%	-56.78%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-81.65%	-57.53%	-24.12%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-64.35%	-12.69%	-51.66%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-48.51%	-43.08%	-5.43%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	24.62%	12.88%	+11.74%

Volatility

AMBA vs. LNG - Volatility Comparison

Ambarella, Inc. (AMBA) has a higher volatility of 35.14% compared to Cheniere Energy, Inc. (LNG) at 7.89%. This indicates that AMBA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LNG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AMBA	LNG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	35.14%	7.89%	+27.25%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	57.00%	22.45%	+34.55%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	72.60%	27.34%	+45.26%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	65.11%	30.37%	+34.74%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	57.86%	32.28%	+25.58%

Dividends

AMBA vs. LNG - Dividend Comparison

AMBA has not paid dividends to shareholders, while LNG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.84%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
AMBA Ambarella, Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
LNG Cheniere Energy, Inc.	0.84%	1.06%	0.84%	0.95%	0.92%	0.33%

Financials

AMBA vs. LNG - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Ambarella, Inc. and Cheniere Energy, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

AMBA - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Ambarella, Inc. reported a gross profit of 58.59M and revenue of 100.36M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 58.4%.

LNG - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Cheniere Energy, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 5.87B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

AMBA - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Ambarella, Inc. reported an operating income of -19.42M and revenue of 100.36M, resulting in an operating margin of -19.4%.

LNG - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Cheniere Energy, Inc. reported an operating income of -3.49B and revenue of 5.87B, resulting in an operating margin of -59.4%.

AMBA - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Ambarella, Inc. reported a net income of -18.09M and revenue of 100.36M, resulting in a net margin of -18.0%.

LNG - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Cheniere Energy, Inc. reported a net income of -3.50B and revenue of 5.87B, resulting in a net margin of -59.7%.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AMBA and LNG in my portfolio?

AMBA and LNG have a correlation of -0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, AMBA or LNG?

AMBA has higher volatility (35.14%) compared to LNG (7.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AMBA dropped -81.65% vs LNG's -97.84%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

LNG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.42 vs 0.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.