AMBA vs. ACLS
Compare and contrast key facts about Ambarella, Inc. (AMBA) and Axcelis Technologies, Inc. (ACLS).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: AMBA or ACLS.
Key characteristics
| AMBA | ACLS | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | -33.02% | -25.24% |
| 1Y Return | -39.02% | -22.66% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | -26.63% | 30.30% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | -4.36% | 35.31% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 4.55% | 29.78% |
| Sharpe Ratio | -0.85 | -0.50 |
| Daily Std Dev | 45.84% | 45.46% |
| Max Drawdown | -81.10% | -99.34% |
| Current Drawdown | -81.07% | -51.64% |
Fundamentals
| AMBA | ACLS | |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $1.68B | $3.09B |
| EPS | -$4.25 | $7.43 |
| PE Ratio | 3.75 | 12.76 |
| PEG Ratio | 4.97 | 1.23 |
| Revenue (TTM) | $226.47M | $1.13B |
| Gross Profit (TTM) | $211.96M | $401.79M |
| EBITDA (TTM) | -$141.25M | $273.26M |
Correlation
The correlation between AMBA and ACLS is 0.46, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
AMBA vs. ACLS - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, AMBA achieves a -33.02% return, which is significantly lower than ACLS's -25.24% return. Over the past 10 years, AMBA has underperformed ACLS with an annualized return of 4.55%, while ACLS has yielded a comparatively higher 29.78% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
AMBA vs. ACLS - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ambarella, Inc. (AMBA) and Axcelis Technologies, Inc. (ACLS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
AMBA vs. ACLS - Dividend Comparison
Neither AMBA nor ACLS has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
AMBA vs. ACLS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AMBA drawdown since its inception was -81.10%, smaller than the maximum ACLS drawdown of -99.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMBA and ACLS. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
AMBA vs. ACLS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Ambarella, Inc. (AMBA) is 10.49%, while Axcelis Technologies, Inc. (ACLS) has a volatility of 11.31%. This indicates that AMBA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ACLS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
AMBA vs. ACLS - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Ambarella, Inc. and Axcelis Technologies, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities