LNG vs. CQP

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Cheniere Energy, Inc. (LNG) and Cheniere Energy Partners, L.P. (CQP).

Performance

LNG vs. CQP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cheniere Energy, Inc. (LNG) and Cheniere Energy Partners, L.P. (CQP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

LNG vs. CQP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
LNG Cheniere Energy, Inc.	46.36%	-8.70%	27.18%	15.02%	49.30%	69.48%	-1.70%	3.18%	9.94%	29.95%
CQP Cheniere Energy Partners, L.P.	22.61%	6.80%	12.59%	-5.09%	44.79%	27.83%	-4.97%	16.60%	30.13%	8.91%

Fundamentals

Market Cap LNG : $60.98B CQP : $31.28B
EPS LNG : $24.33 CQP : $6.15
PE Ratio LNG : 11.66 CQP : 10.51
PEG Ratio LNG : 0.06 CQP : 0.33
PS Ratio LNG : 3.11 CQP : 2.91
PB Ratio LNG : 7.70 CQP : 9.91
Total Revenue (TTM) LNG : $19.98B CQP : $10.76B
Gross Profit (TTM) LNG : $5.46B CQP : $4.31B
EBITDA (TTM) LNG : $9.75B CQP : $4.42B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LNG achieves a 46.36% return, which is significantly higher than CQP's 22.61% return. Over the past 10 years, LNG has outperformed CQP with an annualized return of 24.28%, while CQP has yielded a comparatively lower 16.02% annualized return.

LNG

• 1D: -3.36%
• 1M: 20.38%
• YTD: 46.36%
• 6M: 21.40%
• 1Y: 23.80%
• 3Y*: 22.87%
• 5Y*: 32.83%
• 10Y*: 24.28%

CQP

• 1D: -3.71%
• 1M: 5.43%
• YTD: 22.61%
• 6M: 23.85%
• 1Y: 3.94%
• 3Y*: 18.14%
• 5Y*: 16.24%
• 10Y*: 16.02%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

LNG vs. CQP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LNG

LNG Risk / Return Rank: 66
LNG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 71
LNG Sortino Ratio Rank: 63
LNG Omega Ratio Rank: 64
LNG Calmar Ratio Rank: 67
LNG Martin Ratio Rank: 67

CQP

CQP Risk / Return Rank: 45
CQP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 47
CQP Sortino Ratio Rank: 39
CQP Omega Ratio Rank: 40
CQP Calmar Ratio Rank: 50
CQP Martin Ratio Rank: 47

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LNG vs. CQP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cheniere Energy, Inc. (LNG) and Cheniere Energy Partners, L.P. (CQP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	LNG	CQP	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.81	0.13	+0.68
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.25	0.38	+0.87
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.17	1.05	+0.12
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.19	0.31	+0.88
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	2.72	0.47	+2.26
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

LNG vs. CQP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LNG Sharpe Ratio is 0.81, which is higher than the CQP Sharpe Ratio of 0.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LNG and CQP, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	LNG	CQP	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.81	0.13	+0.68
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.11	0.51	+0.60
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.74	0.50	+0.24
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.17	0.36	-0.19

Correlation

The correlation between LNG and CQP is 0.40, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

LNG vs. CQP - Dividend Comparison

LNG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.74%, less than CQP's 5.11% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
LNG Cheniere Energy, Inc.	0.74%	1.06%	0.84%	0.95%	0.92%	0.33%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
CQP Cheniere Energy Partners, L.P.	5.11%	6.15%	5.06%	8.36%	6.82%	6.30%	7.28%	6.08%	6.07%	5.79%	5.90%	6.52%

Drawdowns

LNG vs. CQP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LNG drawdown since its inception was -97.84%, which is greater than CQP's maximum drawdown of -78.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LNG and CQP.

Drawdown Indicators

	LNG	CQP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-97.84%	-78.46%	-19.38%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-22.34%	-23.58%	+1.24%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-24.87%	-29.12%	+4.25%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-57.53%	-60.31%	+2.78%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.43%	-7.86%	+3.43%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-43.35%	-14.69%	-28.66%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	9.78%	15.75%	-5.97%

Volatility

LNG vs. CQP - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Cheniere Energy, Inc. (LNG) is 11.40%, while Cheniere Energy Partners, L.P. (CQP) has a volatility of 12.49%. This indicates that LNG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CQP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LNG	CQP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	11.40%	12.49%	-1.09%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	18.17%	19.04%	-0.87%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	29.59%	30.56%	-0.97%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	29.87%	32.29%	-2.42%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	32.95%	32.17%	+0.78%

Financials

LNG vs. CQP - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Cheniere Energy, Inc. and Cheniere Energy Partners, L.P. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

LNG - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Cheniere Energy, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 5.67B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

CQP - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Cheniere Energy Partners, L.P. reported a gross profit of 1.49B and revenue of 2.91B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 51.3%.

LNG - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Cheniere Energy, Inc. reported an operating income of 4.74B and revenue of 5.67B, resulting in an operating margin of 83.7%.

CQP - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Cheniere Energy Partners, L.P. reported an operating income of 1.46B and revenue of 2.91B, resulting in an operating margin of 50.3%.

LNG - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Cheniere Energy, Inc. reported a net income of 2.30B and revenue of 5.67B, resulting in a net margin of 40.6%.

CQP - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Cheniere Energy Partners, L.P. reported a net income of 1.28B and revenue of 2.91B, resulting in a net margin of 43.9%.