LNG vs. CQP
Compare and contrast key facts about Cheniere Energy, Inc. (LNG) and Cheniere Energy Partners, L.P. (CQP).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: LNG or CQP.
Correlation
The correlation between LNG and CQP is 0.39, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
LNG vs. CQP - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
LNG:
1.02
CQP:
0.28
LNG:
1.61
CQP:
0.56
LNG:
1.19
CQP:
1.06
LNG:
1.28
CQP:
0.28
LNG:
3.45
CQP:
0.89
LNG:
5.85%
CQP:
7.58%
LNG:
19.71%
CQP:
24.12%
LNG:
-97.84%
CQP:
-78.46%
LNG:
-8.53%
CQP:
-10.84%
Fundamentals
LNG:
$47.27B
CQP:
$26.50B
LNG:
$15.73
CQP:
$4.63
LNG:
13.39
CQP:
11.83
LNG:
0.60
CQP:
6.16
LNG:
$16.09B
CQP:
$8.93B
LNG:
$9.35B
CQP:
$4.72B
LNG:
$8.11B
CQP:
$4.28B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LNG achieves a 22.31% return, which is significantly higher than CQP's 12.97% return. Over the past 10 years, LNG has underperformed CQP with an annualized return of 11.77%, while CQP has yielded a comparatively higher 13.27% annualized return.
LNG
22.31%
-3.77%
28.90%
20.43%
28.51%
11.77%
CQP
12.97%
-1.74%
14.94%
3.40%
13.52%
13.27%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
LNG vs. CQP - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cheniere Energy, Inc. (LNG) and Cheniere Energy Partners, L.P. (CQP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
LNG vs. CQP - Dividend Comparison
LNG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.87%, less than CQP's 6.60% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LNG Cheniere Energy, Inc. | 0.87% | 0.95% | 0.92% | 0.33% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
CQP Cheniere Energy Partners, L.P. | 6.60% | 8.36% | 6.82% | 6.30% | 7.28% | 6.08% | 6.07% | 5.79% | 5.90% | 6.52% | 5.31% | 5.93% |
Drawdowns
LNG vs. CQP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LNG drawdown since its inception was -97.84%, which is greater than CQP's maximum drawdown of -78.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LNG and CQP. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
LNG vs. CQP - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Cheniere Energy, Inc. (LNG) is 6.67%, while Cheniere Energy Partners, L.P. (CQP) has a volatility of 9.42%. This indicates that LNG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CQP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
LNG vs. CQP - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Cheniere Energy, Inc. and Cheniere Energy Partners, L.P.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities