PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Risk Analysis
Optimization
Factor Model
See All Tools
Portfolio Analysis
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
LNG vs. CQP
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


LNGCQP
YTD Return-7.47%4.02%
1Y Return9.58%22.87%
3Y Return (Ann)26.70%14.17%
5Y Return (Ann)20.20%10.24%
10Y Return (Ann)11.16%11.47%
Sharpe Ratio0.510.84
Daily Std Dev21.48%27.49%
Max Drawdown-98.89%-78.49%
Current Drawdown-13.28%-16.11%

Fundamentals


LNGCQP
Market Cap$36.34B$24.57B
EPS$40.72$6.95
PE Ratio3.877.30
PEG Ratio0.606.16
Revenue (TTM)$19.78B$9.66B
Gross Profit (TTM)$5.98B$4.11B
EBITDA (TTM)$16.71B$5.71B

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.4

The correlation between LNG and CQP is 0.39, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Performance

LNG vs. CQP - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, LNG achieves a -7.47% return, which is significantly lower than CQP's 4.02% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with LNG having a 11.16% annualized return and CQP not far ahead at 11.47%. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


400.00%500.00%600.00%700.00%800.00%900.00%1,000.00%December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
402.06%
864.22%
LNG
CQP

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Cheniere Energy, Inc.

Cheniere Energy Partners, L.P.

Risk-Adjusted Performance

LNG vs. CQP - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cheniere Energy, Inc. (LNG) and Cheniere Energy Partners, L.P. (CQP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LNG
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for LNG, currently valued at 0.51, compared to the broader market-2.00-1.000.001.002.003.004.000.51
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for LNG, currently valued at 0.87, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.000.87
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for LNG, currently valued at 1.10, compared to the broader market0.501.001.501.10
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for LNG, currently valued at 0.48, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.48
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for LNG, currently valued at 1.43, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.0030.001.43
CQP
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for CQP, currently valued at 0.84, compared to the broader market-2.00-1.000.001.002.003.004.000.84
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for CQP, currently valued at 1.32, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.001.32
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for CQP, currently valued at 1.15, compared to the broader market0.501.001.501.15
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for CQP, currently valued at 0.87, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.87
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for CQP, currently valued at 2.03, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.0030.002.03

LNG vs. CQP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LNG Sharpe Ratio is 0.51, which is lower than the CQP Sharpe Ratio of 0.84. The chart below compares the 12-month rolling Sharpe Ratio of LNG and CQP.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-0.200.000.200.400.600.801.00December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
0.51
0.84
LNG
CQP

Dividends

LNG vs. CQP - Dividend Comparison

LNG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.05%, less than CQP's 8.13% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
LNG
Cheniere Energy, Inc.
1.05%0.95%0.92%0.33%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
CQP
Cheniere Energy Partners, L.P.
6.10%8.36%6.82%6.30%7.28%6.06%6.04%5.76%5.87%6.49%5.28%5.90%

Drawdowns

LNG vs. CQP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LNG drawdown since its inception was -98.89%, which is greater than CQP's maximum drawdown of -78.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LNG and CQP. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-13.28%
-16.11%
LNG
CQP

Volatility

LNG vs. CQP - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Cheniere Energy, Inc. (LNG) is 6.20%, while Cheniere Energy Partners, L.P. (CQP) has a volatility of 8.36%. This indicates that LNG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CQP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%14.00%December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
6.20%
8.36%
LNG
CQP

Financials

LNG vs. CQP - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Cheniere Energy, Inc. and Cheniere Energy Partners, L.P.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in USD except per share items