PortfoliosLab logo
LNG vs. CQP
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between LNG and CQP is 0.30, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

LNG vs. CQP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cheniere Energy, Inc. (LNG) and Cheniere Energy Partners, L.P. (CQP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

LNG:

1.92

CQP:

0.90

Sortino Ratio

LNG:

2.49

CQP:

1.30

Omega Ratio

LNG:

1.36

CQP:

1.17

Calmar Ratio

LNG:

2.70

CQP:

1.32

Martin Ratio

LNG:

8.25

CQP:

3.56

Ulcer Index

LNG:

7.22%

CQP:

7.68%

Daily Std Dev

LNG:

29.28%

CQP:

32.20%

Max Drawdown

LNG:

-97.84%

CQP:

-78.46%

Current Drawdown

LNG:

-3.69%

CQP:

-12.93%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

LNG:

$53.94B

CQP:

$28.26B

EPS

LNG:

$13.65

CQP:

$4.15

PE Ratio

LNG:

17.82

CQP:

14.07

PEG Ratio

LNG:

2.41

CQP:

6.16

PS Ratio

LNG:

3.22

CQP:

3.01

PB Ratio

LNG:

9.67

CQP:

36.24

Total Revenue (TTM)

LNG:

$16.89B

CQP:

$9.40B

Gross Profit (TTM)

LNG:

$9.22B

CQP:

$4.41B

EBITDA (TTM)

LNG:

$7.31B

CQP:

$2.12B

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with LNG having a 13.70% return and CQP slightly lower at 13.02%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with LNG having a 13.44% annualized return and CQP not far behind at 13.26%.


LNG

YTD

13.70%

1M

3.37%

6M

9.76%

1Y

55.59%

3Y*

20.85%

5Y*

38.52%

10Y*

13.44%

CQP

YTD

13.02%

1M

-2.37%

6M

2.36%

1Y

28.79%

3Y*

10.70%

5Y*

17.37%

10Y*

13.26%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Cheniere Energy, Inc.

Cheniere Energy Partners, L.P.

Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

LNG vs. CQP — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LNG
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of LNG is 9393
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of LNG is 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of LNG is 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of LNG is 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of LNG is 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of LNG is 9292
Martin Ratio Rank

CQP
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of CQP is 7878
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of CQP is 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of CQP is 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of CQP is 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of CQP is 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of CQP is 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

LNG vs. CQP - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cheniere Energy, Inc. (LNG) and Cheniere Energy Partners, L.P. (CQP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current LNG Sharpe Ratio is 1.92, which is higher than the CQP Sharpe Ratio of 0.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LNG and CQP, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

LNG vs. CQP - Dividend Comparison

LNG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.80%, less than CQP's 5.58% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
LNG
Cheniere Energy, Inc.
0.80%0.84%0.95%0.92%0.33%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
CQP
Cheniere Energy Partners, L.P.
5.58%6.52%8.36%6.82%6.30%7.28%6.08%6.07%5.79%5.90%6.52%5.31%

Drawdowns

LNG vs. CQP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LNG drawdown since its inception was -97.84%, which is greater than CQP's maximum drawdown of -78.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LNG and CQP.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

LNG vs. CQP - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Cheniere Energy, Inc. (LNG) is 5.70%, while Cheniere Energy Partners, L.P. (CQP) has a volatility of 9.48%. This indicates that LNG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CQP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

LNG vs. CQP - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Cheniere Energy, Inc. and Cheniere Energy Partners, L.P.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.002.00B4.00B6.00B8.00B10.00B20212022202320242025
5.44B
2.99B
(LNG) Total Revenue
(CQP) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

LNG vs. CQP - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Cheniere Energy, Inc. and Cheniere Energy Partners, L.P. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-50.0%0.0%50.0%100.0%20212022202320242025
34.4%
37.3%
(LNG) Gross Margin
(CQP) Gross Margin
LNG - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2025, Cheniere Energy, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.87B and revenue of 5.44B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 34.4%.

CQP - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2025, Cheniere Energy Partners, L.P. reported a gross profit of 1.12B and revenue of 2.99B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 37.3%.

LNG - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2025, Cheniere Energy, Inc. reported an operating income of 961.00M and revenue of 5.44B, resulting in an operating margin of 17.7%.

CQP - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2025, Cheniere Energy Partners, L.P. reported an operating income of 826.00M and revenue of 2.99B, resulting in an operating margin of 27.6%.

LNG - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2025, Cheniere Energy, Inc. reported a net income of 353.00M and revenue of 5.44B, resulting in a net margin of 6.5%.

CQP - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2025, Cheniere Energy Partners, L.P. reported a net income of 641.00M and revenue of 2.99B, resulting in a net margin of 21.5%.