AMBA vs. QCLN

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Ambarella, Inc. (AMBA) and First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index Fund (QCLN).

QCLN is a passively managed fund by First Trust that tracks the performance of the NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy. It was launched on Feb 8, 2007.

Performance

AMBA vs. QCLN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Ambarella, Inc. (AMBA) and First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index Fund (QCLN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

AMBA vs. QCLN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
AMBA Ambarella, Inc.	-27.34%	-2.61%	18.68%	-25.47%	-59.47%	120.96%	51.62%	73.13%	-40.46%	8.54%
QCLN First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index Fund	4.23%	31.81%	-18.86%	-10.02%	-30.37%	-3.21%	184.00%	42.65%	-12.38%	32.34%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AMBA achieves a -27.34% return, which is significantly lower than QCLN's 4.23% return. Over the past 10 years, AMBA has underperformed QCLN with an annualized return of 1.48%, while QCLN has yielded a comparatively higher 12.77% annualized return.

AMBA

• 1D: 5.81%
• 1M: -14.69%
• YTD: -27.34%
• 6M: -37.62%
• 1Y: 2.27%
• 3Y*: -12.72%
• 5Y*: -13.33%
• 10Y*: 1.48%

QCLN

• 1D: 6.51%
• 1M: -3.99%
• YTD: 4.23%
• 6M: 10.87%
• 1Y: 62.76%
• 3Y*: -3.26%
• 5Y*: -7.25%
• 10Y*: 12.77%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

AMBA vs. QCLN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AMBA

AMBA Risk / Return Rank: 43
AMBA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 43
AMBA Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
AMBA Omega Ratio Rank: 44
AMBA Calmar Ratio Rank: 42
AMBA Martin Ratio Rank: 43

QCLN

QCLN Risk / Return Rank: 87
QCLN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 85
QCLN Sortino Ratio Rank: 86
QCLN Omega Ratio Rank: 77
QCLN Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
QCLN Martin Ratio Rank: 91

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AMBA vs. QCLN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ambarella, Inc. (AMBA) and First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index Fund (QCLN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	AMBA	QCLN	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.03	1.67	-1.64
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.54	2.28	-1.74
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.08	1.28	-0.20
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.03	3.81	-3.78
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	0.08	11.86	-11.78
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

AMBA vs. QCLN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AMBA Sharpe Ratio is 0.03, which is lower than the QCLN Sharpe Ratio of 1.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AMBA and QCLN, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	AMBA	QCLN	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.03	1.67	-1.64
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.22	-0.19	-0.02
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.03	0.37	-0.34
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.30	0.14	+0.16

Correlation

The correlation between AMBA and QCLN is 0.56, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

AMBA vs. QCLN - Dividend Comparison

AMBA has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QCLN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.22%.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
AMBA Ambarella, Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
QCLN First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index Fund	0.22%	0.25%	0.87%	0.76%	0.33%	0.01%	0.30%	0.85%	1.03%	0.45%	1.24%	0.72%

Drawdowns

AMBA vs. QCLN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AMBA drawdown since its inception was -81.65%, which is greater than QCLN's maximum drawdown of -76.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMBA and QCLN.

Drawdown Indicators

	AMBA	QCLN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-81.65%	-76.18%	-5.47%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-49.06%	-16.18%	-32.88%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-81.65%	-69.49%	-12.16%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-81.65%	-71.73%	-9.92%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-76.26%	-46.16%	-30.10%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-48.11%	-43.54%	-4.57%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	20.25%	5.20%	+15.05%

Volatility

AMBA vs. QCLN - Volatility Comparison

Ambarella, Inc. (AMBA) and First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index Fund (QCLN) have volatilities of 13.61% and 14.18%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AMBA	QCLN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	13.61%	14.18%	-0.57%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	46.82%	27.32%	+19.50%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	67.07%	37.76%	+29.31%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	61.74%	37.87%	+23.87%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	56.05%	34.63%	+21.42%