PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
AMBA vs. CRUS
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


AMBACRUS
YTD Return-7.13%21.01%
1Y Return8.27%32.77%
3Y Return (Ann)-33.90%7.91%
5Y Return (Ann)-0.51%6.73%
10Y Return (Ann)1.37%18.63%
Sharpe Ratio0.120.84
Sortino Ratio0.551.45
Omega Ratio1.061.18
Calmar Ratio0.071.05
Martin Ratio0.323.31
Ulcer Index17.91%9.85%
Daily Std Dev48.65%38.63%
Max Drawdown-81.65%-97.48%
Current Drawdown-73.75%-30.90%

Fundamentals


AMBACRUS
Market Cap$2.54B$5.56B
EPS-$4.33$5.88
PEG Ratio4.978.09
Total Revenue (TTM)$169.81M$1.91B
Gross Profit (TTM)$101.77M$983.58M
EBITDA (TTM)-$96.90M$440.10M

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.5

The correlation between AMBA and CRUS is 0.45, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Performance

AMBA vs. CRUS - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, AMBA achieves a -7.13% return, which is significantly lower than CRUS's 21.01% return. Over the past 10 years, AMBA has underperformed CRUS with an annualized return of 1.37%, while CRUS has yielded a comparatively higher 18.63% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-20.00%-10.00%0.00%10.00%20.00%30.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
16.14%
-8.50%
AMBA
CRUS

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

AMBA vs. CRUS - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ambarella, Inc. (AMBA) and Cirrus Logic, Inc. (CRUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AMBA
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for AMBA, currently valued at 0.12, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.000.12
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for AMBA, currently valued at 0.55, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.000.55
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for AMBA, currently valued at 1.06, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.06
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for AMBA, currently valued at 0.07, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.07
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for AMBA, currently valued at 0.32, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.000.32
CRUS
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for CRUS, currently valued at 0.84, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.000.84
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for CRUS, currently valued at 1.45, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.001.45
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for CRUS, currently valued at 1.18, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.18
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for CRUS, currently valued at 1.05, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.001.05
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for CRUS, currently valued at 3.31, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.003.31

AMBA vs. CRUS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AMBA Sharpe Ratio is 0.12, which is lower than the CRUS Sharpe Ratio of 0.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AMBA and CRUS, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.00-0.500.000.501.001.502.002.50JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
0.12
0.84
AMBA
CRUS

Dividends

AMBA vs. CRUS - Dividend Comparison

Neither AMBA nor CRUS has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

AMBA vs. CRUS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AMBA drawdown since its inception was -81.65%, smaller than the maximum CRUS drawdown of -97.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMBA and CRUS. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-80.00%-60.00%-40.00%-20.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-73.75%
-30.90%
AMBA
CRUS

Volatility

AMBA vs. CRUS - Volatility Comparison

Ambarella, Inc. (AMBA) and Cirrus Logic, Inc. (CRUS) have volatilities of 12.41% and 11.89%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


10.00%15.00%20.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
12.41%
11.89%
AMBA
CRUS

Financials

AMBA vs. CRUS - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Ambarella, Inc. and Cirrus Logic, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in USD except per share items