AMBA vs. CRUS
AMBA (Ambarella, Inc.) and CRUS (Cirrus Logic, Inc.) are both stocks. Both are in the Technology sector — AMBA in Semiconductor Equipment & Materials, CRUS in Semiconductors. Over the past 10 years, AMBA returned 2.83%/yr vs 15.37%/yr for CRUS. At a 0.46 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
AMBA vs. CRUS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AMBA achieves a -7.52% return, which is significantly lower than CRUS's 33.15% return. Over the past 10 years, AMBA has underperformed CRUS with an annualized return of 2.83%, while CRUS has yielded a comparatively higher 15.37% annualized return.
AMBA
- 1D
- -7.35%
- 1M
- -25.17%
- YTD
- -7.52%
- 6M
- -8.99%
- 1Y
- 27.04%
- 3Y*
- -5.81%
- 5Y*
- -9.25%
- 10Y*
- 2.83%
CRUS
- 1D
- -4.61%
- 1M
- -7.82%
- YTD
- 33.15%
- 6M
- 30.25%
- 1Y
- 49.33%
- 3Y*
- 28.82%
- 5Y*
- 14.43%
- 10Y*
- 15.37%
AMBA vs. CRUS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMBA Ambarella, Inc. | -7.52% | -2.61% | 18.68% | -25.47% | -59.47% | 120.96% | 51.62% | 73.13% | -40.46% | 8.54% |
CRUS Cirrus Logic, Inc. | 33.15% | 19.00% | 19.70% | 11.69% | -19.06% | 11.95% | -0.25% | 148.37% | -36.02% | -8.28% |
Correlation
The correlation between AMBA and CRUS is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 10, 2012 | 0.46 |
The correlation between AMBA and CRUS shifts across timeframes, from 0.46 (all time) to 0.57 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
AMBA:
$2.86B
CRUS:
$8.26B
AMBA:
-$1.62
CRUS:
$7.84
AMBA:
6.94
CRUS:
4.18
AMBA:
4.72
CRUS:
3.88
AMBA:
$405.19M
CRUS:
$2.00B
AMBA:
$238.32M
CRUS:
$1.05B
AMBA:
-$69.43M
CRUS:
$503.58M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AMBA vs. CRUS — Risk / Return Rank
AMBA
CRUS
AMBA vs. CRUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ambarella, Inc. (AMBA) and Cirrus Logic, Inc. (CRUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AMBA | CRUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.98 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.90 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 1.25 | -0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.55 | 3.11 | -2.56 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.13 | 7.76 | -6.63 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AMBA vs. CRUS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AMBA drawdown since its inception was -81.65%, smaller than the maximum CRUS drawdown of -97.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMBA and CRUS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AMBA | CRUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -81.65% | -97.48% | +15.83% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -49.06% | -15.94% | -33.12% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -53.19% | -46.85% | -6.34% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -81.65% | -46.85% | -34.80% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -81.65% | -55.94% | -25.71% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -69.79% | -11.81% | -57.98% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -48.45% | -52.69% | +4.24% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 24.08% | 6.38% | +17.70% |
Volatility
AMBA vs. CRUS - Volatility Comparison
Ambarella, Inc. (AMBA) has a higher volatility of 34.50% compared to Cirrus Logic, Inc. (CRUS) at 13.77%. This indicates that AMBA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CRUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AMBA | CRUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 34.50% | 13.77% | +20.73% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 49.99% | 26.86% | +23.13% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 68.13% | 36.04% | +32.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 63.39% | 36.34% | +27.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 56.91% | 40.21% | +16.70% |
Dividends
AMBA vs. CRUS - Dividend Comparison
Neither AMBA nor CRUS has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
AMBA vs. CRUS - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Ambarella, Inc. and Cirrus Logic, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
AMBA vs. CRUS - Profitability Comparison
AMBA - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ambarella, Inc. reported a gross profit of 58.59M and revenue of 100.36M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 58.4%.
CRUS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cirrus Logic, Inc. reported a gross profit of 237.64M and revenue of 448.52M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 53.0%.
AMBA - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ambarella, Inc. reported an operating income of -19.42M and revenue of 100.36M, resulting in an operating margin of -19.4%.
CRUS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cirrus Logic, Inc. reported an operating income of 90.30M and revenue of 448.52M, resulting in an operating margin of 20.1%.
AMBA - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ambarella, Inc. reported a net income of -18.09M and revenue of 100.36M, resulting in a net margin of -18.0%.
CRUS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cirrus Logic, Inc. reported a net income of 81.81M and revenue of 448.52M, resulting in a net margin of 18.2%.
Frequently Asked Questions
AMBA and CRUS have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AMBA has higher volatility (34.50%) compared to CRUS (13.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AMBA dropped -81.65% vs CRUS's -97.48%.
CRUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.38 vs 0.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AMBA and CRUS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer