AMBA vs. CRUS

In the year-to-date period, AMBA achieves a 15.73% return, which is significantly lower than CRUS's 20.88% return. Over the past 10 years, AMBA has underperformed CRUS with an annualized return of 3.29%, while CRUS has yielded a comparatively higher 15.63% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ambarella, Inc. (AMBA) and Cirrus Logic, Inc. (CRUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current AMBA Sharpe Ratio is 0.31, which is lower than the CRUS Sharpe Ratio of 0.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AMBA and CRUS, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Neither AMBA nor CRUS has paid dividends to shareholders.

The maximum AMBA drawdown since its inception was -81.65%, smaller than the maximum CRUS drawdown of -97.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMBA and CRUS. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

Ambarella, Inc. (AMBA) has a higher volatility of 15.16% compared to Cirrus Logic, Inc. (CRUS) at 8.15%. This indicates that AMBA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CRUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Ambarella, Inc. and Cirrus Logic, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.