AMBA vs. CRUS

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Ambarella, Inc. (AMBA) and Cirrus Logic, Inc. (CRUS).

Performance

AMBA vs. CRUS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Ambarella, Inc. (AMBA) and Cirrus Logic, Inc. (CRUS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

AMBA vs. CRUS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
AMBA Ambarella, Inc.	-27.34%	-2.61%	18.68%	-25.47%	-59.47%	120.96%	51.62%	73.13%	-40.46%	8.54%
CRUS Cirrus Logic, Inc.	22.04%	19.00%	19.70%	11.69%	-19.06%	11.95%	-0.25%	148.37%	-36.02%	-8.28%

Fundamentals

Market Cap AMBA : $2.22B CRUS : $7.62B
EPS AMBA : -$1.78 CRUS : $7.62
PS Ratio AMBA : 5.61 CRUS : 3.89
PB Ratio AMBA : 3.74 CRUS : 3.54
Total Revenue (TTM) AMBA : $390.70M CRUS : $1.97B
Gross Profit (TTM) AMBA : $231.27M CRUS : $1.04B
EBITDA (TTM) AMBA : -$71.46M CRUS : $521.26M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AMBA achieves a -27.34% return, which is significantly lower than CRUS's 22.04% return. Over the past 10 years, AMBA has underperformed CRUS with an annualized return of 1.48%, while CRUS has yielded a comparatively higher 14.56% annualized return.

AMBA

• 1D: 5.81%
• 1M: -14.69%
• YTD: -27.34%
• 6M: -37.62%
• 1Y: 2.27%
• 3Y*: -12.72%
• 5Y*: -13.33%
• 10Y*: 1.48%

CRUS

• 1D: 4.55%
• 1M: 2.48%
• YTD: 22.04%
• 6M: 15.43%
• 1Y: 45.12%
• 3Y*: 9.76%
• 5Y*: 10.54%
• 10Y*: 14.56%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

AMBA vs. CRUS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AMBA

AMBA Risk / Return Rank: 43
AMBA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 43
AMBA Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
AMBA Omega Ratio Rank: 44
AMBA Calmar Ratio Rank: 42
AMBA Martin Ratio Rank: 43

CRUS

CRUS Risk / Return Rank: 77
CRUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 78
CRUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 73
CRUS Omega Ratio Rank: 74
CRUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 78
CRUS Martin Ratio Rank: 82

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AMBA vs. CRUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ambarella, Inc. (AMBA) and Cirrus Logic, Inc. (CRUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	AMBA	CRUS	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.03	1.14	-1.11
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.54	1.72	-1.18
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.08	1.24	-0.16
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.03	2.02	-1.99
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	0.08	6.47	-6.38
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

AMBA vs. CRUS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AMBA Sharpe Ratio is 0.03, which is lower than the CRUS Sharpe Ratio of 1.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AMBA and CRUS, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	AMBA	CRUS	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.03	1.14	-1.11
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.22	0.29	-0.51
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.03	0.36	-0.34
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.30	0.10	+0.20

Correlation

The correlation between AMBA and CRUS is 0.45, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

AMBA vs. CRUS - Dividend Comparison

Neither AMBA nor CRUS has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

AMBA vs. CRUS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AMBA drawdown since its inception was -81.65%, smaller than the maximum CRUS drawdown of -97.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMBA and CRUS.

Drawdown Indicators

	AMBA	CRUS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-81.65%	-97.48%	+15.83%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-49.06%	-22.44%	-26.62%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-81.65%	-46.85%	-34.80%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-81.65%	-55.94%	-25.71%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-76.26%	-2.74%	-73.52%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-48.11%	-53.00%	+4.89%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	20.25%	7.01%	+13.24%

Volatility

AMBA vs. CRUS - Volatility Comparison

Ambarella, Inc. (AMBA) has a higher volatility of 13.61% compared to Cirrus Logic, Inc. (CRUS) at 11.50%. This indicates that AMBA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CRUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AMBA	CRUS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	13.61%	11.50%	+2.11%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	46.82%	25.11%	+21.71%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	67.07%	39.67%	+27.40%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	61.74%	36.12%	+25.62%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	56.05%	40.29%	+15.76%

Financials

AMBA vs. CRUS - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Ambarella, Inc. and Cirrus Logic, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

AMBA - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Ambarella, Inc. reported a gross profit of 58.16M and revenue of 100.87M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 57.7%.

CRUS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Cirrus Logic, Inc. reported a gross profit of 308.13M and revenue of 580.62M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 53.1%.

AMBA - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Ambarella, Inc. reported an operating income of -19.65M and revenue of 100.87M, resulting in an operating margin of -19.5%.

CRUS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Cirrus Logic, Inc. reported an operating income of 152.93M and revenue of 580.62M, resulting in an operating margin of 26.3%.

AMBA - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Ambarella, Inc. reported a net income of -16.44M and revenue of 100.87M, resulting in a net margin of -16.3%.

CRUS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Cirrus Logic, Inc. reported a net income of 140.31M and revenue of 580.62M, resulting in a net margin of 24.2%.