PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
LNG vs. UNG
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between LNG and UNG is 0.12, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


-0.50.00.51.00.1

Performance

LNG vs. UNG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cheniere Energy, Inc. (LNG) and United States Natural Gas Fund LP (UNG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

0.00%200.00%400.00%600.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
668.29%
-99.72%
LNG
UNG

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

LNG:

2.73

UNG:

-0.35

Sortino Ratio

LNG:

3.83

UNG:

-0.14

Omega Ratio

LNG:

1.47

UNG:

0.99

Calmar Ratio

LNG:

3.61

UNG:

-0.21

Martin Ratio

LNG:

13.70

UNG:

-0.69

Ulcer Index

LNG:

4.17%

UNG:

30.73%

Daily Std Dev

LNG:

20.92%

UNG:

60.58%

Max Drawdown

LNG:

-97.84%

UNG:

-99.85%

Current Drawdown

LNG:

-0.35%

UNG:

-99.77%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LNG achieves a 17.63% return, which is significantly higher than UNG's 9.10% return. Over the past 10 years, LNG has outperformed UNG with an annualized return of 13.43%, while UNG has yielded a comparatively lower -22.55% annualized return.


LNG

YTD

17.63%

1M

22.31%

6M

39.61%

1Y

57.26%

5Y*

31.77%

10Y*

13.43%

UNG

YTD

9.10%

1M

26.13%

6M

28.25%

1Y

-17.54%

5Y*

-21.71%

10Y*

-22.55%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

LNG vs. UNG — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LNG
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of LNG is 9595
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of LNG is 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of LNG is 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of LNG is 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of LNG is 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of LNG is 9595
Martin Ratio Rank

UNG
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of UNG is 44
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of UNG is 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of UNG is 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of UNG is 55
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of UNG is 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of UNG is 44
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

LNG vs. UNG - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cheniere Energy, Inc. (LNG) and United States Natural Gas Fund LP (UNG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for LNG, currently valued at 2.73, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.002.73-0.35
The chart of Sortino ratio for LNG, currently valued at 3.83, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.003.83-0.14
The chart of Omega ratio for LNG, currently valued at 1.47, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.470.99
The chart of Calmar ratio for LNG, currently valued at 3.61, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.003.61-0.21
The chart of Martin ratio for LNG, currently valued at 13.70, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.0013.70-0.69
LNG
UNG

The current LNG Sharpe Ratio is 2.73, which is higher than the UNG Sharpe Ratio of -0.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LNG and UNG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.000.001.002.003.00AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
2.73
-0.35
LNG
UNG

Dividends

LNG vs. UNG - Dividend Comparison

LNG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.71%, while UNG has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM2024202320222021
LNG
Cheniere Energy, Inc.
0.71%0.84%0.95%0.92%0.33%
UNG
United States Natural Gas Fund LP
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

LNG vs. UNG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LNG drawdown since its inception was -97.84%, roughly equal to the maximum UNG drawdown of -99.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LNG and UNG. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-100.00%-80.00%-60.00%-40.00%-20.00%0.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
-0.35%
-99.77%
LNG
UNG

Volatility

LNG vs. UNG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Cheniere Energy, Inc. (LNG) is 7.18%, while United States Natural Gas Fund LP (UNG) has a volatility of 27.40%. This indicates that LNG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UNG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%25.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
7.18%
27.40%
LNG
UNG
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab