LNG vs. EQT

In the year-to-date period, LNG achieves a 26.13% return, which is significantly higher than EQT's 12.49% return. Over the past 10 years, LNG has outperformed EQT with an annualized return of 11.44%, while EQT has yielded a comparatively lower -1.36% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cheniere Energy, Inc. (LNG) and EQT Corporation (EQT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current LNG Sharpe Ratio is 1.21, which is higher than the EQT Sharpe Ratio of 0.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LNG and EQT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

LNG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.85%, less than EQT's 1.50% yield.

The maximum LNG drawdown since its inception was -97.84%, which is greater than EQT's maximum drawdown of -91.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LNG and EQT. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

The current volatility for Cheniere Energy, Inc. (LNG) is 8.45%, while EQT Corporation (EQT) has a volatility of 12.88%. This indicates that LNG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EQT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Cheniere Energy, Inc. and EQT Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.