PortfoliosLab logo
LNG vs. EQT
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between LNG and EQT is 0.40, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

LNG vs. EQT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cheniere Energy, Inc. (LNG) and EQT Corporation (EQT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

LNG:

1.63

EQT:

0.99

Sortino Ratio

LNG:

2.21

EQT:

1.47

Omega Ratio

LNG:

1.32

EQT:

1.20

Calmar Ratio

LNG:

2.30

EQT:

0.82

Martin Ratio

LNG:

7.18

EQT:

3.31

Ulcer Index

LNG:

7.08%

EQT:

11.43%

Daily Std Dev

LNG:

29.14%

EQT:

37.58%

Max Drawdown

LNG:

-97.84%

EQT:

-91.50%

Current Drawdown

LNG:

-7.66%

EQT:

-1.42%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

LNG:

$52.13B

EQT:

$33.44B

EPS

LNG:

$13.63

EQT:

$0.61

PE Ratio

LNG:

17.25

EQT:

91.57

PEG Ratio

LNG:

2.14

EQT:

0.54

PS Ratio

LNG:

3.11

EQT:

5.43

PB Ratio

LNG:

9.34

EQT:

1.61

Total Revenue (TTM)

LNG:

$16.89B

EQT:

$6.34B

Gross Profit (TTM)

LNG:

$8.43B

EQT:

$3.11B

EBITDA (TTM)

LNG:

$6.53B

EQT:

$3.35B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LNG achieves a 9.01% return, which is significantly lower than EQT's 21.21% return. Over the past 10 years, LNG has outperformed EQT with an annualized return of 12.41%, while EQT has yielded a comparatively lower 2.26% annualized return.


LNG

YTD

9.01%

1M

0.97%

6M

9.07%

1Y

46.97%

3Y*

22.59%

5Y*

39.55%

10Y*

12.41%

EQT

YTD

21.21%

1M

9.31%

6M

26.22%

1Y

37.02%

3Y*

12.56%

5Y*

34.55%

10Y*

2.26%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Cheniere Energy, Inc.

EQT Corporation

Risk-Adjusted Performance

LNG vs. EQT — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LNG
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of LNG is 9191
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of LNG is 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of LNG is 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of LNG is 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of LNG is 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of LNG is 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

EQT
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of EQT is 7979
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of EQT is 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of EQT is 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of EQT is 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of EQT is 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of EQT is 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

LNG vs. EQT - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cheniere Energy, Inc. (LNG) and EQT Corporation (EQT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current LNG Sharpe Ratio is 1.63, which is higher than the EQT Sharpe Ratio of 0.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LNG and EQT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

LNG vs. EQT - Dividend Comparison

LNG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.83%, less than EQT's 1.13% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
LNG
Cheniere Energy, Inc.
0.83%0.84%0.95%0.92%0.33%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
EQT
EQT Corporation
1.13%1.37%1.57%1.63%0.00%0.24%1.10%83.99%0.24%0.21%0.26%0.18%

Drawdowns

LNG vs. EQT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LNG drawdown since its inception was -97.84%, which is greater than EQT's maximum drawdown of -91.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LNG and EQT. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

LNG vs. EQT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Cheniere Energy, Inc. (LNG) is 7.40%, while EQT Corporation (EQT) has a volatility of 11.42%. This indicates that LNG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EQT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

LNG vs. EQT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Cheniere Energy, Inc. and EQT Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.002.00B4.00B6.00B8.00B10.00B20212022202320242025
5.44B
2.42B
(LNG) Total Revenue
(EQT) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

LNG vs. EQT - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Cheniere Energy, Inc. and EQT Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-50.0%0.0%50.0%100.0%20212022202320242025
20.0%
70.7%
(LNG) Gross Margin
(EQT) Gross Margin
LNG - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Cheniere Energy, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.09B and revenue of 5.44B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 20.0%.

EQT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, EQT Corporation reported a gross profit of 1.71B and revenue of 2.42B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 70.7%.

LNG - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Cheniere Energy, Inc. reported an operating income of 961.00M and revenue of 5.44B, resulting in an operating margin of 17.7%.

EQT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, EQT Corporation reported an operating income of 496.25M and revenue of 2.42B, resulting in an operating margin of 20.5%.

LNG - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Cheniere Energy, Inc. reported a net income of 353.00M and revenue of 5.44B, resulting in a net margin of 6.5%.

EQT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, EQT Corporation reported a net income of 242.14M and revenue of 2.42B, resulting in a net margin of 10.0%.