AMBA vs. SNPS

In the year-to-date period, AMBA achieves a 7.48% return, which is significantly higher than SNPS's 6.27% return. Over the past 10 years, AMBA has underperformed SNPS with an annualized return of 3.32%, while SNPS has yielded a comparatively higher 28.45% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ambarella, Inc. (AMBA) and Synopsys, Inc. (SNPS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current AMBA Sharpe Ratio is 0.85, which is higher than the SNPS Sharpe Ratio of 0.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AMBA and SNPS, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Neither AMBA nor SNPS has paid dividends to shareholders.

The maximum AMBA drawdown since its inception was -81.65%, which is greater than SNPS's maximum drawdown of -60.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMBA and SNPS. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

Ambarella, Inc. (AMBA) has a higher volatility of 13.73% compared to Synopsys, Inc. (SNPS) at 8.62%. This indicates that AMBA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SNPS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Ambarella, Inc. and Synopsys, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.