PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
AMBA vs. RMBS
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


AMBARMBS
YTD Return-7.13%-24.82%
1Y Return8.27%-21.52%
3Y Return (Ann)-33.90%28.27%
5Y Return (Ann)-0.51%30.05%
10Y Return (Ann)1.37%16.00%
Sharpe Ratio0.12-0.39
Sortino Ratio0.55-0.22
Omega Ratio1.060.97
Calmar Ratio0.07-0.34
Martin Ratio0.32-0.85
Ulcer Index17.91%27.04%
Daily Std Dev48.65%57.96%
Max Drawdown-81.65%-97.16%
Current Drawdown-73.75%-56.29%

Fundamentals


AMBARMBS
Market Cap$2.54B$5.90B
EPS-$4.33$1.61
PEG Ratio4.973.80
Total Revenue (TTM)$169.81M$517.75M
Gross Profit (TTM)$101.77M$405.26M
EBITDA (TTM)-$96.90M$202.92M

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.5

The correlation between AMBA and RMBS is 0.47, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Performance

AMBA vs. RMBS - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, AMBA achieves a -7.13% return, which is significantly higher than RMBS's -24.82% return. Over the past 10 years, AMBA has underperformed RMBS with an annualized return of 1.37%, while RMBS has yielded a comparatively higher 16.00% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%10.00%20.00%30.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
16.14%
-11.49%
AMBA
RMBS

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

AMBA vs. RMBS - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ambarella, Inc. (AMBA) and Rambus Inc. (RMBS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AMBA
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for AMBA, currently valued at 0.12, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.000.12
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for AMBA, currently valued at 0.55, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.000.55
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for AMBA, currently valued at 1.06, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.06
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for AMBA, currently valued at 0.07, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.07
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for AMBA, currently valued at 0.32, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.000.32
RMBS
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for RMBS, currently valued at -0.39, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.00-0.39
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for RMBS, currently valued at -0.22, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.00-0.22
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for RMBS, currently valued at 0.97, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.000.97
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for RMBS, currently valued at -0.47, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.00-0.47
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for RMBS, currently valued at -0.85, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.00-0.85

AMBA vs. RMBS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AMBA Sharpe Ratio is 0.12, which is higher than the RMBS Sharpe Ratio of -0.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AMBA and RMBS, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.00-0.500.000.50JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
0.12
-0.39
AMBA
RMBS

Dividends

AMBA vs. RMBS - Dividend Comparison

Neither AMBA nor RMBS has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

AMBA vs. RMBS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AMBA drawdown since its inception was -81.65%, smaller than the maximum RMBS drawdown of -97.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMBA and RMBS. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-80.00%-60.00%-40.00%-20.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-73.75%
-30.65%
AMBA
RMBS

Volatility

AMBA vs. RMBS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Ambarella, Inc. (AMBA) is 12.41%, while Rambus Inc. (RMBS) has a volatility of 21.62%. This indicates that AMBA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RMBS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


10.00%15.00%20.00%25.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
12.41%
21.62%
AMBA
RMBS

Financials

AMBA vs. RMBS - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Ambarella, Inc. and Rambus Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in USD except per share items