XMVM vs. FVAL

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

XMVM (Invesco S&P MidCap Value with Momentum ETF) and FVAL (Fidelity Value Factor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XMVM is a Momentum fund tracking the S&P MidCap 400 High Momentum Value Index, while FVAL is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Fidelity U.S. Value Factor Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XMVM returned 12.87%/yr vs 12.67%/yr for FVAL. Their 0.79 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. XMVM charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for FVAL.

Performance

XMVM vs. FVAL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P MidCap Value with Momentum ETF (XMVM) and Fidelity Value Factor ETF (FVAL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XMVM achieves a 18.13% return, which is significantly higher than FVAL's 13.79% return.

XMVM

• 1D: 0.59%
• 1M: 5.73%
• 6M: 13.53%
• YTD: 18.13%
• 1Y: 39.09%
• 3Y*: 18.08%
• 5Y*: 12.87%
• 10Y*: 12.28%
• ALL TIME*: 9.73%

FVAL

• 1D: 1.37%
• 1M: 3.94%
• 6M: 10.53%
• YTD: 13.79%
• 1Y: 30.22%
• 3Y*: 19.75%
• 5Y*: 12.67%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 14.71%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
FVAL Fidelity Value Factor ETF	$5.69M	$3.79M	$2.97M
XMVM Invesco S&P MidCap Value with Momentum ETF	$2.19M	$2.07M	$1.98M

XMVM vs. FVAL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
XMVM Invesco S&P MidCap Value with Momentum ETF	18.13%	18.46%	11.73%	16.31%	-8.21%	35.15%	5.68%	30.38%	-9.62%	2.79%
FVAL Fidelity Value Factor ETF	13.79%	19.56%	18.05%	23.10%	-14.40%	30.33%	9.08%	30.33%	-7.87%	22.49%

Correlation

The correlation between XMVM and FVAL is 0.55, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.55
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.72
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.80
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 15, 2016	0.79

Over the past year, the correlation between XMVM and FVAL has dropped to 0.55 - well below their long-term average of 0.79, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

XMVM vs. FVAL - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	XMVM	FVAL
Financial Services	37.9%	12.5%
Consumer Cyclical	14.8%	10.4%
Energy	13.5%	3.2%
Industrials	11.7%	9.1%
Utilities	8.5%	2.0%
Technology	5.1%	33.6%
Real Estate	4.9%	2.6%
Healthcare	2.5%	10.7%
Consumer Defensive	1.2%	4.6%
Communication Services	0.9%	9.4%
Basic Materials	0.8%	1.9%

Return for Risk

XMVM vs. FVAL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

XMVM

XMVM Risk / Return Rank: 92
XMVM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 94
XMVM Sortino Ratio Rank: 94
XMVM Omega Ratio Rank: 93
XMVM Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
XMVM Martin Ratio Rank: 88

FVAL

FVAL Risk / Return Rank: 90
FVAL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
FVAL Sortino Ratio Rank: 92
FVAL Omega Ratio Rank: 91
FVAL Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
FVAL Martin Ratio Rank: 89

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

XMVM vs. FVAL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P MidCap Value with Momentum ETF (XMVM) and Fidelity Value Factor ETF (FVAL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	XMVM	FVAL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.67	2.50	+0.17
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.84	3.41	+0.43
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.48	1.45	+0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.28	3.40	+0.88
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.71	13.91	-0.20

XMVM vs. FVAL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XMVM Sharpe Ratio is 2.67, which is comparable to the FVAL Sharpe Ratio of 2.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XMVM and FVAL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

XMVM vs. FVAL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XMVM drawdown since its inception was -62.83%, which is greater than FVAL's maximum drawdown of -37.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XMVM and FVAL.

Drawdown Indicators

	XMVM	FVAL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-62.83%	-37.26%	-25.57%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.18%	-8.92%	-0.26%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-24.12%	-18.39%	-5.73%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-24.12%	-23.42%	-0.70%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-45.07%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.12%	0.00%	-0.12%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.19%	-4.54%	-5.65%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.86%	2.18%	+0.68%

Volatility

XMVM vs. FVAL - Volatility Comparison

Invesco S&P MidCap Value with Momentum ETF (XMVM) has a higher volatility of 3.30% compared to Fidelity Value Factor ETF (FVAL) at 3.09%. This indicates that XMVM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FVAL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XMVM	FVAL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.30%	3.09%	+0.21%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.25%	9.33%	-0.08%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.72%	12.15%	+2.57%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.24%	16.50%	+4.74%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.74%	18.03%	+4.71%

XMVM vs. FVAL - Expense Ratio Comparison

XMVM has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than FVAL's 0.15% expense ratio.

Dividends

XMVM vs. FVAL - Dividend Comparison

XMVM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.78%, more than FVAL's 1.54% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FVAL Fidelity Value Factor ETF	1.54%	1.61%	1.60%	1.69%	1.79%	1.41%	1.61%	1.77%	2.06%	1.62%	0.45%	0.00%
XMVM Invesco S&P MidCap Value with Momentum ETF	1.78%	2.07%	1.43%	1.57%	1.76%	1.10%	1.37%	1.73%	2.87%	2.22%	2.27%	2.58%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XMVM and FVAL in my portfolio?

XMVM and FVAL have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, XMVM or FVAL?

XMVM has higher volatility (3.30%) compared to FVAL (3.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XMVM dropped -62.83% vs FVAL's -37.26%.

Which ETF is better, XMVM or FVAL?

On 5-year performance, XMVM leads with 12.87% vs 12.67% for FVAL. On fees, FVAL is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, FVAL has been the lower-risk option at 3.09%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, XMVM or FVAL?

Over the 5-year period, XMVM has performed better with a 12.87% return vs 12.67%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, XMVM or FVAL?

FVAL is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for XMVM.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, XMVM or FVAL?

XMVM has the higher dividend yield at 1.78%, compared with 1.54% for FVAL.

What is the main difference between XMVM and FVAL?

XMVM is categorized as Momentum, while FVAL is Large Cap Value Equities. XMVM tracks S&P MidCap 400 High Momentum Value Index, while FVAL tracks Fidelity U.S. Value Factor Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for XMVM and 0.15% for FVAL.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

XMVM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.67 vs 2.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.