XMVM vs. RFV
Compare and contrast key facts about Invesco S&P MidCap Value with Momentum ETF (XMVM) and Invesco S&P MidCap 400® Pure Value ETF (RFV).
XMVM and RFV are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. XMVM is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the S&P MidCap 400 High Momentum Value Index. It was launched on Mar 3, 2005. RFV is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the S&P Mid Cap 400 Pure Value. It was launched on Mar 1, 2006. Both XMVM and RFV are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: XMVM or RFV.
Correlation
The correlation between XMVM and RFV is 0.87, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
XMVM vs. RFV - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
XMVM:
0.67
RFV:
0.34
XMVM:
1.07
RFV:
0.60
XMVM:
1.13
RFV:
1.07
XMVM:
1.11
RFV:
0.67
XMVM:
3.33
RFV:
1.42
XMVM:
3.73%
RFV:
4.38%
XMVM:
18.69%
RFV:
18.46%
XMVM:
-62.83%
RFV:
-71.82%
XMVM:
-10.70%
RFV:
-8.58%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XMVM achieves a 11.23% return, which is significantly higher than RFV's 4.11% return. Over the past 10 years, XMVM has underperformed RFV with an annualized return of 9.35%, while RFV has yielded a comparatively higher 9.95% annualized return.
XMVM
11.23%
-7.58%
8.57%
10.81%
11.10%
9.35%
RFV
4.11%
-3.44%
7.93%
4.66%
13.49%
9.95%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
XMVM vs. RFV - Expense Ratio Comparison
XMVM has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than RFV's 0.35% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
XMVM vs. RFV - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P MidCap Value with Momentum ETF (XMVM) and Invesco S&P MidCap 400® Pure Value ETF (RFV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
XMVM vs. RFV - Dividend Comparison
XMVM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.03%, more than RFV's 0.98% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XMVM Invesco S&P MidCap Value with Momentum ETF | 1.03% | 1.57% | 1.76% | 1.10% | 1.37% | 1.73% | 2.87% | 2.22% | 2.27% | 2.58% | 1.52% | 1.39% |
RFV Invesco S&P MidCap 400® Pure Value ETF | 0.98% | 1.27% | 2.05% | 1.60% | 1.52% | 1.71% | 1.39% | 1.36% | 0.88% | 1.79% | 1.19% | 0.80% |
Drawdowns
XMVM vs. RFV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XMVM drawdown since its inception was -62.83%, smaller than the maximum RFV drawdown of -71.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XMVM and RFV. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
XMVM vs. RFV - Volatility Comparison
Invesco S&P MidCap Value with Momentum ETF (XMVM) and Invesco S&P MidCap 400® Pure Value ETF (RFV) have volatilities of 5.84% and 5.65%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.