FVAL vs. SCHD
FVAL (Fidelity Value Factor ETF) and SCHD (Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FVAL is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Fidelity U.S. Value Factor Index, while SCHD is a Dividend fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FVAL returned 12.83%/yr vs 8.49%/yr for SCHD. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FVAL charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for SCHD.
Performance
FVAL vs. SCHD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FVAL achieves a 11.80% return, which is significantly lower than SCHD's 19.01% return.
FVAL
- 1D
- -0.16%
- 1M
- 5.45%
- YTD
- 11.80%
- 6M
- 14.11%
- 1Y
- 33.08%
- 3Y*
- 21.19%
- 5Y*
- 12.83%
- 10Y*
- —
SCHD
- 1D
- 0.59%
- 1M
- 1.60%
- YTD
- 19.01%
- 6M
- 20.36%
- 1Y
- 28.08%
- 3Y*
- 15.09%
- 5Y*
- 8.49%
- 10Y*
- 12.77%
FVAL vs. SCHD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FVAL Fidelity Value Factor ETF | 11.80% | 19.56% | 18.05% | 23.10% | -14.40% | 30.33% | 9.08% | 30.33% | -7.87% | 22.49% |
SCHD Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF | 19.01% | 4.34% | 11.66% | 4.54% | -3.26% | 29.87% | 15.03% | 27.29% | -5.56% | 20.85% |
Correlation
The correlation between FVAL and SCHD is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 16, 2016 | 0.82 |
Over the past year, the correlation between FVAL and SCHD has dropped to 0.49 - well below their long-term average of 0.82, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
FVAL vs. SCHD - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FVAL
SCHD
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
Utilities
Technology
FVAL
SCHD
Financial Services
FVAL
SCHD
Consumer Cyclical
FVAL
SCHD
Communication Services
FVAL
SCHD
Healthcare
FVAL
SCHD
Industrials
FVAL
SCHD
Consumer Defensive
FVAL
SCHD
Energy
FVAL
SCHD
Real Estate
FVAL
SCHD
-
Basic Materials
FVAL
SCHD
Utilities
FVAL
SCHD
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FVAL vs. SCHD — Risk / Return Rank
FVAL
SCHD
FVAL vs. SCHD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Value Factor ETF (FVAL) and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FVAL | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.88 | 2.57 | +0.30 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.97 | 3.98 | -0.01 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.52 | 1.46 | +0.06 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.77 | 6.17 | -2.40 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.89 | 15.20 | +1.69 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FVAL | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.88 | 2.57 | +0.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.78 | 0.59 | +0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.77 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.81 | 0.86 | -0.05 |
Drawdowns
FVAL vs. SCHD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FVAL drawdown since its inception was -37.26%, which is greater than SCHD's maximum drawdown of -33.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FVAL and SCHD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FVAL | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.26% | -33.37% | -3.89% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.92% | -4.61% | -4.31% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.39% | -16.13% | -2.26% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.42% | -16.85% | -6.57% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.37% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.16% | -1.40% | +1.24% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.58% | -3.32% | -1.26% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.99% | 1.87% | +0.12% |
Volatility
FVAL vs. SCHD - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fidelity Value Factor ETF (FVAL) is 2.73%, while Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) has a volatility of 2.92%. This indicates that FVAL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FVAL | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.73% | 2.92% | -0.19% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.63% | 7.66% | +0.97% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.55% | 10.96% | +0.59% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.47% | 14.38% | +2.09% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.11% | 16.72% | +1.39% |
FVAL vs. SCHD - Expense Ratio Comparison
FVAL has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHD's 0.06% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
FVAL vs. SCHD - Dividend Comparison
FVAL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.48%, less than SCHD's 3.26% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FVAL Fidelity Value Factor ETF | 1.48% | 1.61% | 1.60% | 1.69% | 1.79% | 1.41% | 1.61% | 1.77% | 2.06% | 1.62% | 0.45% | 0.00% |
SCHD Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF | 3.26% | 3.82% | 3.64% | 3.49% | 3.39% | 2.78% | 3.16% | 2.98% | 3.06% | 2.63% | 2.89% | 2.97% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FVAL and SCHD have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SCHD has higher volatility (2.92%) compared to FVAL (2.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FVAL dropped -37.26% vs SCHD's -33.37%.
On 5-year performance, FVAL leads with 12.83% vs 8.49% for SCHD. On fees, SCHD is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, FVAL has been the lower-risk option at 2.73%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, FVAL has performed better with a 12.83% return vs 8.49%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHD is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for FVAL.
SCHD has the higher dividend yield at 3.26%, compared with 1.48% for FVAL.
FVAL is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while SCHD is Dividend. FVAL tracks Fidelity U.S. Value Factor Index, while SCHD tracks Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for FVAL and 0.06% for SCHD.
FVAL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.88 vs 2.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FVAL and SCHD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer