FVAL vs. HERO
FVAL (Fidelity Value Factor ETF) and HERO (Global X Video Games & Esports ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FVAL is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Fidelity U.S. Value Factor Index, while HERO is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Solactive Video Games & Esports Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FVAL returned 12.83%/yr vs -2.80%/yr for HERO. A 0.56 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FVAL charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for HERO.
Performance
FVAL vs. HERO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FVAL achieves a 11.80% return, which is significantly higher than HERO's -11.67% return.
FVAL
- 1D
- -0.16%
- 1M
- 5.45%
- YTD
- 11.80%
- 6M
- 14.11%
- 1Y
- 33.08%
- 3Y*
- 21.19%
- 5Y*
- 12.83%
- 10Y*
- —
HERO
- 1D
- 0.87%
- 1M
- -0.48%
- YTD
- -11.67%
- 6M
- -14.74%
- 1Y
- -10.49%
- 3Y*
- 10.64%
- 5Y*
- -2.80%
- 10Y*
- —
FVAL vs. HERO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FVAL Fidelity Value Factor ETF | 11.80% | 19.56% | 18.05% | 23.10% | -14.40% | 30.33% | 9.08% | 7.19% |
HERO Global X Video Games & Esports ETF | -11.67% | 28.74% | 17.65% | 8.36% | -33.42% | -8.37% | 91.02% | 9.12% |
Correlation
The correlation between FVAL and HERO is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 1, 2019 | 0.56 |
The correlation between FVAL and HERO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.53 to 0.59 - a consistent structural relationship.
FVAL vs. HERO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FVAL
HERO
Technology
Financial Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Communication Services
Healthcare
-
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
-
Utilities
-
Technology
FVAL
HERO
Financial Services
FVAL
HERO
-
Consumer Cyclical
FVAL
HERO
-
Communication Services
FVAL
HERO
Healthcare
FVAL
HERO
-
Industrials
FVAL
HERO
Consumer Defensive
FVAL
HERO
-
Energy
FVAL
HERO
-
Real Estate
FVAL
HERO
-
Basic Materials
FVAL
HERO
-
Utilities
FVAL
HERO
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FVAL vs. HERO — Risk / Return Rank
FVAL
HERO
FVAL vs. HERO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Value Factor ETF (FVAL) and Global X Video Games & Esports ETF (HERO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FVAL | HERO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.88 | -0.54 | +3.42 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.97 | -0.63 | +4.60 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.52 | 0.92 | +0.60 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.77 | -0.34 | +4.11 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.89 | -0.64 | +17.53 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FVAL | HERO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.88 | -0.54 | +3.42 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.78 | -0.12 | +0.90 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.81 | 0.40 | +0.41 |
Drawdowns
FVAL vs. HERO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FVAL drawdown since its inception was -37.26%, smaller than the maximum HERO drawdown of -54.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FVAL and HERO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FVAL | HERO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.26% | -54.02% | +16.76% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.92% | -26.64% | +17.72% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.39% | -26.64% | +8.25% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.42% | -48.44% | +25.02% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.16% | -25.67% | +25.51% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.58% | -25.97% | +21.39% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.99% | 14.02% | -12.03% |
Volatility
FVAL vs. HERO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fidelity Value Factor ETF (FVAL) is 2.73%, while Global X Video Games & Esports ETF (HERO) has a volatility of 4.53%. This indicates that FVAL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HERO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FVAL | HERO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.73% | 4.53% | -1.80% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.63% | 14.92% | -6.29% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.55% | 19.46% | -7.91% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.47% | 23.35% | -6.88% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.11% | 24.49% | -6.38% |
FVAL vs. HERO - Expense Ratio Comparison
FVAL has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than HERO's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
FVAL vs. HERO - Dividend Comparison
FVAL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.48%, less than HERO's 1.84% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FVAL Fidelity Value Factor ETF | 1.48% | 1.61% | 1.60% | 1.69% | 1.79% | 1.41% | 1.61% | 1.77% | 2.06% | 1.62% | 0.45% |
HERO Global X Video Games & Esports ETF | 1.84% | 1.62% | 1.06% | 0.73% | 0.28% | 0.79% | 0.71% | 0.17% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FVAL and HERO have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HERO has higher volatility (4.53%) compared to FVAL (2.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FVAL dropped -37.26% vs HERO's -54.02%.
On 5-year performance, FVAL leads with 12.83% vs -2.80% for HERO. On fees, FVAL is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, FVAL has been the lower-risk option at 2.73%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, FVAL has performed better with a 12.83% return vs -2.80%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FVAL is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for HERO.
HERO has the higher dividend yield at 1.84%, compared with 1.48% for FVAL.
FVAL is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while HERO is Large Cap Growth Equities. FVAL tracks Fidelity U.S. Value Factor Index, while HERO tracks Solactive Video Games & Esports Index. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for FVAL and 0.50% for HERO.
FVAL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.88 vs -0.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FVAL and HERO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer