XMVM vs. RWK

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

XMVM (Invesco S&P MidCap Value with Momentum ETF) and RWK (Invesco S&P MidCap 400 Revenue ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XMVM is a Momentum fund tracking the S&P MidCap 400 High Momentum Value Index, while RWK is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the S&P MidCap 400 Revenue-Weighted Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XMVM returned 11.80%/yr vs 12.83%/yr for RWK. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.39% expense ratio.

Performance

XMVM vs. RWK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P MidCap Value with Momentum ETF (XMVM) and Invesco S&P MidCap 400 Revenue ETF (RWK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XMVM achieves a 8.55% return, which is significantly lower than RWK's 13.73% return. Over the past 10 years, XMVM has underperformed RWK with an annualized return of 11.80%, while RWK has yielded a comparatively higher 12.83% annualized return.

XMVM

• 1D: 0.99%
• 1M: -0.27%
• YTD: 8.55%
• 6M: 12.23%
• 1Y: 31.43%
• 3Y*: 19.09%
• 5Y*: 9.75%
• 10Y*: 11.80%

RWK

• 1D: 1.10%
• 1M: 3.22%
• YTD: 13.73%
• 6M: 14.17%
• 1Y: 30.18%
• 3Y*: 18.14%
• 5Y*: 10.78%
• 10Y*: 12.83%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XMVM vs. RWK - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
XMVM Invesco S&P MidCap Value with Momentum ETF	8.55%	18.46%	11.73%	16.31%	-8.21%	35.15%	5.68%	30.38%	-9.62%	2.79%
RWK Invesco S&P MidCap 400 Revenue ETF	13.73%	10.27%	11.94%	23.76%	-8.19%	34.31%	11.06%	28.20%	-14.65%	13.39%

Correlation

The correlation between XMVM and RWK is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.85
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.92
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.94
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.92
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 25, 2008	0.89

The correlation between XMVM and RWK has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

XMVM vs. RWK - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	XMVM	RWK
Financial Services	41.8%	13.1%
Consumer Cyclical	14.5%	20.7%
Utilities	9.9%	1.6%
Industrials	8.6%	21.8%
Energy	8.3%	5.3%
Consumer Defensive	7.3%	11.3%
Real Estate	4.3%	2.8%
Technology	3.6%	14.0%
Communication Services	1.0%	0.7%
Basic Materials	0.8%	4.7%
Healthcare	0.7%	4.0%

Return for Risk

XMVM vs. RWK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XMVM

XMVM Risk / Return Rank: 61
XMVM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 61
XMVM Sortino Ratio Rank: 63
XMVM Omega Ratio Rank: 58
XMVM Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
XMVM Martin Ratio Rank: 58

RWK

RWK Risk / Return Rank: 52
RWK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 52
RWK Sortino Ratio Rank: 56
RWK Omega Ratio Rank: 50
RWK Calmar Ratio Rank: 52
RWK Martin Ratio Rank: 49

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XMVM vs. RWK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P MidCap Value with Momentum ETF (XMVM) and Invesco S&P MidCap 400 Revenue ETF (RWK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	XMVM	RWK	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.06	1.82	+0.24
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.95	2.70	+0.25
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.36	1.31	+0.05
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.37	2.62	+0.75
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	10.42	8.44	+1.98
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

XMVM vs. RWK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XMVM Sharpe Ratio is 2.06, which is comparable to the RWK Sharpe Ratio of 1.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XMVM and RWK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	XMVM	RWK	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.06	1.82	+0.24
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.45	0.51	-0.06
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.52	0.56	-0.04
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.43	0.48	-0.05

Drawdowns

XMVM vs. RWK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XMVM drawdown since its inception was -62.83%, which is greater than RWK's maximum drawdown of -56.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XMVM and RWK.

Drawdown Indicators

	XMVM	RWK	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-62.83%	-56.49%	-6.34%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.18%	-11.14%	+1.96%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-24.12%	-24.58%	+0.46%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-24.12%	-24.58%	+0.46%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-45.07%	-46.20%	+1.13%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.71%	0.00%	-0.71%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.27%	-7.56%	-2.71%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.97%	3.46%	-0.49%

Volatility

XMVM vs. RWK - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco S&P MidCap Value with Momentum ETF (XMVM) is 3.48%, while Invesco S&P MidCap 400 Revenue ETF (RWK) has a volatility of 4.93%. This indicates that XMVM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RWK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XMVM	RWK	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.48%	4.93%	-1.45%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.76%	11.87%	-2.11%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.37%	16.72%	-1.35%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.54%	21.13%	+0.41%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.81%	22.96%	-0.15%

XMVM vs. RWK - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both XMVM and RWK have an expense ratio of 0.39%.

Dividends

XMVM vs. RWK - Dividend Comparison

XMVM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.95%, more than RWK's 1.12% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
RWK Invesco S&P MidCap 400 Revenue ETF	1.12%	1.25%	1.11%	1.05%	1.18%	0.85%	0.96%	1.09%	1.22%	0.99%	1.30%	0.92%
XMVM Invesco S&P MidCap Value with Momentum ETF	1.95%	2.07%	1.43%	1.57%	1.76%	1.10%	1.37%	1.73%	2.87%	2.22%	2.27%	2.58%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XMVM and RWK in my portfolio?

XMVM and RWK have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, XMVM or RWK?

RWK has higher volatility (4.93%) compared to XMVM (3.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XMVM dropped -62.83% vs RWK's -56.49%.

Which ETF is better, XMVM or RWK?

On 10-year performance, RWK leads with 12.83% vs 11.80% for XMVM. Both ETFs have the same 0.39% expense ratio. On volatility, XMVM has been the lower-risk option at 3.48%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, XMVM or RWK?

Over the 10-year period, RWK has performed better with a 12.83% return vs 11.80%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, XMVM or RWK?

XMVM and RWK have the same expense ratio: 0.39% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, XMVM or RWK?

XMVM has the higher dividend yield at 1.95%, compared with 1.12% for RWK.

What is the main difference between XMVM and RWK?

XMVM is categorized as Momentum, while RWK is Small Cap Blend Equities. XMVM tracks S&P MidCap 400 High Momentum Value Index, while RWK tracks S&P MidCap 400 Revenue-Weighted Index.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

XMVM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.06 vs 1.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.