XMVM vs. RWK
Compare and contrast key facts about Invesco S&P MidCap Value with Momentum ETF (XMVM) and Invesco S&P MidCap 400 Revenue ETF (RWK).
XMVM and RWK are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. XMVM is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the S&P MidCap 400 High Momentum Value Index. It was launched on Mar 3, 2005. RWK is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the S&P MidCap 400 Revenue-Weighted Index. It was launched on Feb 22, 2008. Both XMVM and RWK are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: XMVM or RWK.
Performance
XMVM vs. RWK - Performance Comparison
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XMVM achieves a 22.29% return, which is significantly higher than RWK's 19.47% return. Over the past 10 years, XMVM has underperformed RWK with an annualized return of 10.45%, while RWK has yielded a comparatively higher 11.19% annualized return.
XMVM
22.29%
9.04%
15.94%
33.83%
14.32%
10.45%
RWK
19.47%
7.07%
10.95%
31.18%
16.15%
11.19%
Key characteristics
| XMVM | RWK | |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.81 | 1.83 |
| Sortino Ratio | 2.62 | 2.61 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.32 | 1.32 |
| Calmar Ratio | 3.67 | 3.87 |
| Martin Ratio | 9.89 | 10.31 |
| Ulcer Index | 3.42% | 3.03% |
| Daily Std Dev | 18.65% | 17.02% |
| Max Drawdown | -62.83% | -56.49% |
| Current Drawdown | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
XMVM vs. RWK - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both XMVM and RWK have an expense ratio of 0.39%.
Correlation
The correlation between XMVM and RWK is 0.89, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
XMVM vs. RWK - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P MidCap Value with Momentum ETF (XMVM) and Invesco S&P MidCap 400 Revenue ETF (RWK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
XMVM vs. RWK - Dividend Comparison
XMVM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.24%, more than RWK's 1.01% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XMVM Invesco S&P MidCap Value with Momentum ETF | 1.24% | 1.57% | 1.76% | 1.10% | 1.37% | 1.73% | 2.87% | 2.22% | 2.27% | 2.58% | 1.52% | 1.39% |
RWK Invesco S&P MidCap 400 Revenue ETF | 1.01% | 1.05% | 1.18% | 0.85% | 0.96% | 1.09% | 1.22% | 0.74% | 1.30% | 0.92% | 1.03% | 1.29% |
Drawdowns
XMVM vs. RWK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XMVM drawdown since its inception was -62.83%, which is greater than RWK's maximum drawdown of -56.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XMVM and RWK. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
XMVM vs. RWK - Volatility Comparison
Invesco S&P MidCap Value with Momentum ETF (XMVM) has a higher volatility of 8.17% compared to Invesco S&P MidCap 400 Revenue ETF (RWK) at 6.07%. This indicates that XMVM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RWK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.