PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FVAL vs. VTV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FVAL vs. VTV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Value Factor ETF (FVAL) and Vanguard Value ETF (VTV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with FVAL having a 11.80% return and VTV slightly higher at 12.28%.


FVAL

1D
-0.16%
1M
5.45%
YTD
11.80%
6M
14.11%
1Y
33.08%
3Y*
21.19%
5Y*
12.83%
10Y*

VTV

1D
0.88%
1M
3.55%
YTD
12.28%
6M
14.14%
1Y
26.90%
3Y*
18.27%
5Y*
11.31%
10Y*
12.48%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FVAL vs. VTV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FVAL
Fidelity Value Factor ETF
11.80%19.56%18.05%23.10%-14.40%30.33%9.08%30.33%-7.87%22.49%
VTV
Vanguard Value ETF
12.28%15.27%15.95%9.32%-2.09%26.53%2.33%25.66%-5.47%17.15%

Correlation

The correlation between FVAL and VTV is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.75

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.80

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 16, 2016

0.88

The correlation between FVAL and VTV shifts across timeframes, from 0.75 (1 year) to 0.88 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

FVAL vs. VTV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FVAL
VTV

Technology

32.6%
13.4%

Financial Services

11.4%
22.3%

Consumer Cyclical

9.9%
4.0%

Communication Services

9.4%
3.3%

Healthcare

9.3%
14.5%

Industrials

8.1%
14.0%

Consumer Defensive

4.3%
9.4%

Energy

4.1%
8.1%

Real Estate

2.4%
2.8%

Basic Materials

1.9%
3.1%

Utilities

1.8%
5.2%

Technology

FVAL
32.6%
VTV
13.4%

Financial Services

FVAL
11.4%
VTV
22.3%

Consumer Cyclical

FVAL
9.9%
VTV
4.0%

Communication Services

FVAL
9.4%
VTV
3.3%

Healthcare

FVAL
9.3%
VTV
14.5%

Industrials

FVAL
8.1%
VTV
14.0%

Consumer Defensive

FVAL
4.3%
VTV
9.4%

Energy

FVAL
4.1%
VTV
8.1%

Real Estate

FVAL
2.4%
VTV
2.8%

Basic Materials

FVAL
1.9%
VTV
3.1%

Utilities

FVAL
1.8%
VTV
5.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FVAL vs. VTV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FVAL
FVAL Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
FVAL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FVAL Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
FVAL Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
FVAL Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
FVAL Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

VTV
VTV Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
VTV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VTV Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
VTV Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
VTV Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
VTV Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FVAL vs. VTV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Value Factor ETF (FVAL) and Vanguard Value ETF (VTV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FVALVTVDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.88

2.67

+0.21

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.97

3.82

+0.15

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.52

1.48

+0.04

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.77

4.27

-0.49

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

16.89

16.15

+0.74

FVAL vs. VTV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FVAL Sharpe Ratio is 2.88, which is comparable to the VTV Sharpe Ratio of 2.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FVAL and VTV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FVALVTVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.88

2.67

+0.21

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

0.82

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.75

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.81

0.51

+0.30

Drawdowns

FVAL vs. VTV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FVAL drawdown since its inception was -37.26%, smaller than the maximum VTV drawdown of -59.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FVAL and VTV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FVALVTVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.26%

-59.27%

+22.01%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.92%

-6.35%

-2.57%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.39%

-14.52%

-3.87%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.42%

-17.04%

-6.38%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.78%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.16%

0.00%

-0.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.58%

-7.87%

+3.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.99%

1.68%

+0.31%

Volatility

FVAL vs. VTV - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Value Factor ETF (FVAL) and Vanguard Value ETF (VTV) have volatilities of 2.73% and 2.65%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FVALVTVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.73%

2.65%

+0.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.63%

7.59%

+1.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.55%

10.11%

+1.44%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.47%

13.88%

+2.59%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.11%

16.67%

+1.44%

FVAL vs. VTV - Expense Ratio Comparison

FVAL has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than VTV's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

FVAL vs. VTV - Dividend Comparison

FVAL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.48%, less than VTV's 1.86% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FVAL
Fidelity Value Factor ETF
1.48%1.61%1.60%1.69%1.79%1.41%1.61%1.77%2.06%1.62%0.45%0.00%
VTV
Vanguard Value ETF
1.86%2.05%2.31%2.46%2.52%2.15%2.56%2.50%2.73%2.29%2.44%2.60%

Frequently Asked Questions


FVAL and VTV have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FVAL has higher volatility (2.73%) compared to VTV (2.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FVAL dropped -37.26% vs VTV's -59.27%.

On 5-year performance, FVAL leads with 12.83% vs 11.31% for VTV. On fees, VTV is cheaper at 0.04% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, FVAL has performed better with a 12.83% return vs 11.31%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VTV is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for FVAL.

VTV has the higher dividend yield at 1.86%, compared with 1.48% for FVAL.

FVAL tracks Fidelity U.S. Value Factor Index, while VTV tracks CRSP US Large Cap Value Index. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for FVAL and 0.04% for VTV.

FVAL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.88 vs 2.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FVAL and VTV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer