FVAL vs. DEEP
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Value Factor ETF (FVAL) and Roundhill Acquirers Deep Value ETF (DEEP).
FVAL and DEEP are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. FVAL is a passively managed fund by Fidelity that tracks the performance of the Fidelity U.S. Value Factor Index. It was launched on Sep 12, 2016. DEEP is a passively managed fund by Exchange Traded Concepts that tracks the performance of the DEEP-US - Acquirers Deep Value Index. It was launched on Sep 23, 2014. Both FVAL and DEEP are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: FVAL or DEEP.
Correlation
The correlation between FVAL and DEEP is 0.70, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
FVAL vs. DEEP - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
FVAL:
0.56
DEEP:
-0.37
FVAL:
0.92
DEEP:
-0.39
FVAL:
1.14
DEEP:
0.95
FVAL:
0.56
DEEP:
-0.29
FVAL:
2.20
DEEP:
-0.80
FVAL:
4.71%
DEEP:
10.40%
FVAL:
18.56%
DEEP:
22.55%
FVAL:
-37.26%
DEEP:
-51.92%
FVAL:
-8.30%
DEEP:
-19.59%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FVAL achieves a -3.12% return, which is significantly higher than DEEP's -12.05% return.
FVAL
-3.12%
3.83%
-1.47%
8.67%
15.80%
N/A
DEEP
-12.05%
3.65%
-11.14%
-10.26%
10.79%
4.54%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FVAL vs. DEEP - Expense Ratio Comparison
FVAL has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than DEEP's 0.80% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
FVAL vs. DEEP — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
FVAL
DEEP
FVAL vs. DEEP - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Value Factor ETF (FVAL) and Roundhill Acquirers Deep Value ETF (DEEP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
FVAL vs. DEEP - Dividend Comparison
FVAL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.70%, less than DEEP's 2.85% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FVAL Fidelity Value Factor ETF | 1.70% | 1.60% | 1.69% | 1.79% | 1.41% | 1.61% | 1.77% | 2.06% | 1.62% | 0.45% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
DEEP Roundhill Acquirers Deep Value ETF | 2.85% | 1.96% | 1.67% | 1.28% | 1.43% | 4.03% | 3.49% | 2.78% | 2.01% | 3.14% | 3.98% | 0.42% |
Drawdowns
FVAL vs. DEEP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FVAL drawdown since its inception was -37.26%, smaller than the maximum DEEP drawdown of -51.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FVAL and DEEP. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
FVAL vs. DEEP - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Value Factor ETF (FVAL) has a higher volatility of 14.11% compared to Roundhill Acquirers Deep Value ETF (DEEP) at 13.14%. This indicates that FVAL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DEEP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.