PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FVAL vs. VOO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FVAL vs. VOO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Value Factor ETF (FVAL) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FVAL achieves a 12.26% return, which is significantly higher than VOO's 10.16% return.


FVAL

1D
0.57%
1M
2.54%
6M
9.88%
YTD
12.26%
1Y
28.47%
3Y*
18.46%
5Y*
12.35%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
14.57%

VOO

1D
0.71%
1M
0.26%
6M
8.58%
YTD
10.16%
1Y
21.58%
3Y*
19.42%
5Y*
12.83%
10Y*
15.14%
ALL TIME*
14.78%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$5.44M$3.65M$2.95M
$3.82B$3.78B$5.44B

FVAL vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FVAL
Fidelity Value Factor ETF
12.26%19.56%18.05%23.10%-14.40%30.33%9.08%30.33%-7.87%22.49%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
10.16%17.82%24.98%26.32%-18.17%28.79%18.32%31.37%-4.50%21.77%

Correlation

The correlation between FVAL and VOO is 0.92, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 15, 2016

0.94

The correlation between FVAL and VOO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

FVAL vs. VOO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FVAL
VOO

Technology

33.6%
38.6%

Financial Services

12.5%
11.4%

Healthcare

10.7%
8.9%

Consumer Cyclical

10.4%
9.5%

Communication Services

9.4%
9.9%

Industrials

9.1%
8.5%

Consumer Defensive

4.6%
4.5%

Energy

3.2%
3.0%

Real Estate

2.6%
1.8%

Utilities

2.0%
2.2%

Basic Materials

1.9%
1.7%

Technology

FVAL
33.6%
VOO
38.6%

Financial Services

FVAL
12.5%
VOO
11.4%

Healthcare

FVAL
10.7%
VOO
8.9%

Consumer Cyclical

FVAL
10.4%
VOO
9.5%

Communication Services

FVAL
9.4%
VOO
9.9%

Industrials

FVAL
9.1%
VOO
8.5%

Consumer Defensive

FVAL
4.6%
VOO
4.5%

Energy

FVAL
3.2%
VOO
3.0%

Real Estate

FVAL
2.6%
VOO
1.8%

Utilities

FVAL
2.0%
VOO
2.2%

Basic Materials

FVAL
1.9%
VOO
1.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FVAL vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FVAL
FVAL Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
FVAL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FVAL Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
FVAL Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
FVAL Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
FVAL Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank

VOO
VOO Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
VOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOO Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
VOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOO Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FVAL vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Value Factor ETF (FVAL) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FVALVOODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.68

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.90

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.28

+0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.02

2.21

+0.81

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.33

9.44

+2.90

FVAL vs. VOO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FVAL Sharpe Ratio is 2.22, which is higher than the VOO Sharpe Ratio of 1.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FVAL and VOO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FVAL vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FVAL drawdown since its inception was -37.26%, which is greater than VOO's maximum drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FVAL and VOO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FVALVOODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.26%

-33.99%

-3.27%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.92%

-8.90%

-0.02%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.39%

-18.69%

+0.30%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.42%

-24.52%

+1.10%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-1.38%

+1.38%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.54%

-3.67%

-0.87%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.18%

2.08%

+0.10%

Volatility

FVAL vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Value Factor ETF (FVAL) is 2.90%, while Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) has a volatility of 3.54%. This indicates that FVAL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FVALVOODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.90%

3.54%

-0.64%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.24%

10.10%

-0.86%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.16%

12.82%

-0.66%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.49%

16.93%

-0.44%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.03%

18.01%

+0.02%

FVAL vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison

FVAL has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

FVAL vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison

FVAL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.56%, more than VOO's 1.07% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FVAL
Fidelity Value Factor ETF
1.56%1.61%1.60%1.69%1.79%1.41%1.61%1.77%2.06%1.62%0.45%0.00%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
1.07%1.13%1.24%1.46%1.69%1.25%1.54%1.88%2.06%1.78%2.02%2.10%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, FVAL and VOO move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

VOO has higher volatility (3.54%) compared to FVAL (2.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FVAL dropped -37.26% vs VOO's -33.99%.

On 5-year performance, VOO leads with 12.83% vs 12.35% for FVAL. On fees, VOO is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, FVAL has been the lower-risk option at 2.90%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, VOO has performed better with a 12.83% return vs 12.35%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VOO is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for FVAL.

FVAL has the higher dividend yield at 1.56%, compared with 1.07% for VOO.

FVAL is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while VOO is S&P 500. FVAL tracks Fidelity U.S. Value Factor Index, while VOO tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for FVAL and 0.03% for VOO.

FVAL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.22 vs 1.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FVAL and VOO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer