FVAL vs. DGRO
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Value Factor ETF (FVAL) and iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO).
FVAL and DGRO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. FVAL is a passively managed fund by Fidelity that tracks the performance of the Fidelity U.S. Value Factor Index. It was launched on Sep 12, 2016. DGRO is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Morningstar US Dividend Growth Index. It was launched on Jun 10, 2014. Both FVAL and DGRO are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: FVAL or DGRO.
Performance
FVAL vs. DGRO - Performance Comparison
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with FVAL having a 19.50% return and DGRO slightly lower at 19.14%.
FVAL
19.50%
1.18%
10.30%
27.46%
13.24%
N/A
DGRO
19.14%
-0.44%
9.59%
26.59%
11.75%
11.72%
Key characteristics
| FVAL | DGRO | |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio | 2.36 | 2.76 |
| Sortino Ratio | 3.16 | 3.90 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.44 | 1.51 |
| Calmar Ratio | 3.48 | 5.19 |
| Martin Ratio | 14.84 | 18.07 |
| Ulcer Index | 1.82% | 1.46% |
| Daily Std Dev | 11.45% | 9.55% |
| Max Drawdown | -37.26% | -35.10% |
| Current Drawdown | -1.64% | -1.79% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FVAL vs. DGRO - Expense Ratio Comparison
FVAL has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is higher than DGRO's 0.08% expense ratio.
Correlation
The correlation between FVAL and DGRO is 0.92, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
FVAL vs. DGRO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Value Factor ETF (FVAL) and iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
FVAL vs. DGRO - Dividend Comparison
FVAL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.59%, less than DGRO's 2.18% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FVAL Fidelity Value Factor ETF | 1.59% | 1.69% | 1.79% | 1.41% | 1.61% | 1.77% | 2.06% | 1.62% | 0.45% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
DGRO iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF | 2.18% | 2.45% | 2.34% | 1.93% | 2.30% | 2.21% | 2.44% | 2.03% | 2.27% | 2.52% | 0.97% |
Drawdowns
FVAL vs. DGRO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FVAL drawdown since its inception was -37.26%, which is greater than DGRO's maximum drawdown of -35.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FVAL and DGRO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
FVAL vs. DGRO - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Value Factor ETF (FVAL) has a higher volatility of 4.23% compared to iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO) at 3.22%. This indicates that FVAL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DGRO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.