FVAL vs. RWL
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Value Factor ETF (FVAL) and Invesco S&P 500 Revenue ETF (RWL).
FVAL and RWL are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. FVAL is a passively managed fund by Fidelity that tracks the performance of the Fidelity U.S. Value Factor Index. It was launched on Sep 12, 2016. RWL is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Revenue-Weighted Index. It was launched on Feb 22, 2008. Both FVAL and RWL are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: FVAL or RWL.
Performance
FVAL vs. RWL - Performance Comparison
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with FVAL having a 20.47% return and RWL slightly higher at 21.24%.
FVAL
20.47%
1.96%
12.54%
27.89%
13.41%
N/A
RWL
21.24%
3.56%
12.59%
28.26%
14.33%
11.63%
Key characteristics
| FVAL | RWL | |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio | 2.49 | 2.82 |
| Sortino Ratio | 3.31 | 3.91 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.46 | 1.52 |
| Calmar Ratio | 3.67 | 4.75 |
| Martin Ratio | 15.65 | 17.24 |
| Ulcer Index | 1.82% | 1.68% |
| Daily Std Dev | 11.46% | 10.24% |
| Max Drawdown | -37.26% | -54.83% |
| Current Drawdown | -0.83% | -0.36% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FVAL vs. RWL - Expense Ratio Comparison
FVAL has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than RWL's 0.39% expense ratio.
Correlation
The correlation between FVAL and RWL is 0.94, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
FVAL vs. RWL - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Value Factor ETF (FVAL) and Invesco S&P 500 Revenue ETF (RWL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
FVAL vs. RWL - Dividend Comparison
FVAL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.57%, more than RWL's 1.39% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FVAL Fidelity Value Factor ETF | 1.57% | 1.69% | 1.79% | 1.41% | 1.61% | 1.77% | 2.06% | 1.62% | 0.45% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RWL Invesco S&P 500 Revenue ETF | 1.39% | 1.60% | 1.62% | 1.35% | 1.75% | 1.87% | 1.99% | 1.61% | 1.71% | 1.97% | 1.43% | 1.61% |
Drawdowns
FVAL vs. RWL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FVAL drawdown since its inception was -37.26%, smaller than the maximum RWL drawdown of -54.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FVAL and RWL. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
FVAL vs. RWL - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Value Factor ETF (FVAL) and Invesco S&P 500 Revenue ETF (RWL) have volatilities of 4.15% and 3.97%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.