XLU vs. NOBL
XLU (State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF) and NOBL (ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XLU is a Utilities Equities fund tracking the Utilities Select Sector Index, while NOBL is a Dividend fund tracking the S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XLU returned 9.20%/yr vs 9.94%/yr for NOBL. A 0.51 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XLU charges 0.08%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for NOBL.
Performance
XLU vs. NOBL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XLU achieves a 5.04% return, which is significantly lower than NOBL's 7.43% return. Over the past 10 years, XLU has underperformed NOBL with an annualized return of 9.20%, while NOBL has yielded a comparatively higher 9.94% annualized return.
XLU
- 1D
- 1.09%
- 1M
- -0.82%
- YTD
- 5.04%
- 6M
- 5.48%
- 1Y
- 12.50%
- 3Y*
- 13.79%
- 5Y*
- 9.41%
- 10Y*
- 9.20%
NOBL
- 1D
- 0.54%
- 1M
- 4.72%
- YTD
- 7.43%
- 6M
- 6.43%
- 1Y
- 13.97%
- 3Y*
- 8.55%
- 5Y*
- 5.94%
- 10Y*
- 9.94%
XLU vs. NOBL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XLU State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF | 5.04% | 16.03% | 23.31% | -7.18% | 1.44% | 17.70% | 0.51% | 25.93% | 3.94% | 12.05% |
NOBL ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF | 7.43% | 6.84% | 6.72% | 8.09% | -6.52% | 25.46% | 8.35% | 27.39% | -3.26% | 21.02% |
Correlation
The correlation between XLU and NOBL is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 10, 2013 | 0.51 |
The correlation between XLU and NOBL shifts across timeframes, from 0.39 (1 year) to 0.58 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
XLU vs. NOBL - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XLU
NOBL
Utilities
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Utilities
XLU
NOBL
Basic Materials
XLU
-
NOBL
Communication Services
XLU
-
NOBL
-
Consumer Cyclical
XLU
-
NOBL
Consumer Defensive
XLU
-
NOBL
Energy
XLU
-
NOBL
Financial Services
XLU
-
NOBL
Healthcare
XLU
-
NOBL
Industrials
XLU
-
NOBL
Real Estate
XLU
-
NOBL
Technology
XLU
-
NOBL
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XLU vs. NOBL — Risk / Return Rank
XLU
NOBL
XLU vs. NOBL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLU) and ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (NOBL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XLU | NOBL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.28 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.49 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.19 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.30 | 1.38 | -0.08 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.80 | 3.53 | -0.73 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XLU vs. NOBL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XLU drawdown since its inception was -51.98%, which is greater than NOBL's maximum drawdown of -35.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLU and NOBL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XLU | NOBL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -51.98% | -35.43% | -16.55% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.18% | -9.11% | -0.07% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.26% | -15.36% | -1.90% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.26% | -17.92% | -7.34% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.07% | -35.43% | -0.64% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.05% | -2.43% | -3.62% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.22% | -3.48% | -6.74% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.25% | 3.56% | +0.69% |
Volatility
XLU vs. NOBL - Volatility Comparison
State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLU) has a higher volatility of 5.59% compared to ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (NOBL) at 2.95%. This indicates that XLU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NOBL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XLU | NOBL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.59% | 2.95% | +2.64% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.68% | 8.11% | +3.57% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.66% | 11.52% | +3.14% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.34% | 14.41% | +2.93% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.27% | 16.61% | +2.66% |
XLU vs. NOBL - Expense Ratio Comparison
XLU has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than NOBL's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
XLU vs. NOBL - Dividend Comparison
XLU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.67%, more than NOBL's 2.04% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NOBL ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF | 2.04% | 2.14% | 2.05% | 2.09% | 1.94% | 1.89% | 2.14% | 1.89% | 2.37% | 1.74% | 2.13% | 2.02% |
XLU State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF | 2.67% | 2.71% | 2.96% | 3.39% | 2.92% | 2.79% | 3.14% | 2.95% | 3.33% | 3.33% | 3.41% | 3.67% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XLU and NOBL have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XLU has higher volatility (5.59%) compared to NOBL (2.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XLU dropped -51.98% vs NOBL's -35.43%.
On 10-year performance, NOBL leads with 9.94% vs 9.20% for XLU. On fees, XLU is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, NOBL has been the lower-risk option at 2.95%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, NOBL has performed better with a 9.94% return vs 9.20%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XLU is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for NOBL.
XLU has the higher dividend yield at 2.67%, compared with 2.04% for NOBL.
XLU is categorized as Utilities Equities, while NOBL is Dividend. XLU tracks Utilities Select Sector Index, while NOBL tracks S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for XLU and 0.35% for NOBL.
NOBL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.09 vs 0.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XLU and NOBL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer