XLU vs. FUTY
XLU (State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF) and FUTY (Fidelity MSCI Utilities Index ETF) are both Utilities Equities funds - XLU tracks the Utilities Select Sector Index while FUTY tracks the MSCI USA IMI Utilities Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XLU returned 9.33%/yr vs 9.20%/yr for FUTY. With a 0.99 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. Both charge a 0.08% expense ratio.
Performance
XLU vs. FUTY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with XLU having a 4.61% return and FUTY slightly lower at 4.60%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with XLU having a 9.33% annualized return and FUTY not far behind at 9.20%.
XLU
- 1D
- 0.93%
- 1M
- -1.71%
- YTD
- 4.61%
- 6M
- 3.91%
- 1Y
- 12.36%
- 3Y*
- 14.14%
- 5Y*
- 9.56%
- 10Y*
- 9.33%
FUTY
- 1D
- 0.79%
- 1M
- -1.56%
- YTD
- 4.60%
- 6M
- 3.78%
- 1Y
- 12.73%
- 3Y*
- 14.03%
- 5Y*
- 9.44%
- 10Y*
- 9.20%
XLU vs. FUTY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XLU State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF | 4.61% | 16.03% | 23.31% | -7.18% | 1.44% | 17.70% | 0.51% | 25.93% | 3.94% | 12.05% |
FUTY Fidelity MSCI Utilities Index ETF | 4.60% | 16.40% | 23.20% | -7.46% | 1.12% | 17.53% | -0.80% | 24.89% | 4.36% | 12.52% |
Correlation
The correlation between XLU and FUTY is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.00 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 1.00 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.00 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 25, 2013 | 0.99 |
The correlation between XLU and FUTY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.99 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.
XLU vs. FUTY - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XLU
FUTY
Utilities
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
XLU
FUTY
Basic Materials
XLU
-
FUTY
-
Communication Services
XLU
-
FUTY
-
Consumer Cyclical
XLU
-
FUTY
-
Consumer Defensive
XLU
-
FUTY
-
Energy
XLU
-
FUTY
Financial Services
XLU
-
FUTY
-
Healthcare
XLU
-
FUTY
-
Industrials
XLU
-
FUTY
Real Estate
XLU
-
FUTY
-
Technology
XLU
-
FUTY
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XLU vs. FUTY — Risk / Return Rank
XLU
FUTY
XLU vs. FUTY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLU) and Fidelity MSCI Utilities Index ETF (FUTY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XLU | FUTY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.04 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.04 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.17 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.41 | 1.48 | -0.08 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.12 | 3.30 | -0.18 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XLU | FUTY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.89 | 0.93 | -0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.55 | 0.55 | 0.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.49 | 0.48 | 0.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.40 | 0.56 | -0.16 |
Drawdowns
XLU vs. FUTY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XLU drawdown since its inception was -51.98%, which is greater than FUTY's maximum drawdown of -36.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLU and FUTY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XLU | FUTY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -51.98% | -36.44% | -15.54% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.18% | -8.93% | -0.25% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.26% | -17.35% | +0.09% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.26% | -25.11% | -0.15% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.07% | -36.44% | +0.37% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.43% | -5.99% | -0.44% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.22% | -6.03% | -4.19% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.13% | 4.00% | +0.13% |
Volatility
XLU vs. FUTY - Volatility Comparison
State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLU) and Fidelity MSCI Utilities Index ETF (FUTY) have volatilities of 5.44% and 5.49%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XLU | FUTY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.44% | 5.49% | -0.05% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.55% | 11.41% | +0.14% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.49% | 14.25% | +0.24% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.32% | 17.08% | +0.24% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.26% | 19.05% | +0.21% |
XLU vs. FUTY - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both XLU and FUTY have an expense ratio of 0.08%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
XLU vs. FUTY - Dividend Comparison
XLU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.68%, more than FUTY's 2.58% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FUTY Fidelity MSCI Utilities Index ETF | 2.58% | 2.67% | 2.96% | 3.31% | 2.72% | 2.70% | 3.07% | 2.82% | 3.11% | 3.03% | 3.35% | 4.33% |
XLU State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF | 2.68% | 2.71% | 2.96% | 3.39% | 2.92% | 2.79% | 3.14% | 2.95% | 3.33% | 3.33% | 3.41% | 3.67% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 1.00, XLU and FUTY move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
FUTY has higher volatility (5.49%) compared to XLU (5.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XLU dropped -51.98% vs FUTY's -36.44%.
On 10-year performance, XLU leads with 9.33% vs 9.20% for FUTY. Both ETFs have the same 0.08% expense ratio. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, XLU has performed better with a 9.33% return vs 9.20%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XLU and FUTY have the same expense ratio: 0.08% per year.
XLU has the higher dividend yield at 2.68%, compared with 2.58% for FUTY.
XLU tracks Utilities Select Sector Index, while FUTY tracks MSCI USA IMI Utilities Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Fidelity.
FUTY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.93 vs 0.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XLU and FUTY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer