PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XLU vs. FUTY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XLU vs. FUTY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLU) and Fidelity MSCI Utilities Index ETF (FUTY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with XLU having a 4.61% return and FUTY slightly lower at 4.60%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with XLU having a 9.33% annualized return and FUTY not far behind at 9.20%.


XLU

1D
0.93%
1M
-1.71%
YTD
4.61%
6M
3.91%
1Y
12.36%
3Y*
14.14%
5Y*
9.56%
10Y*
9.33%

FUTY

1D
0.79%
1M
-1.56%
YTD
4.60%
6M
3.78%
1Y
12.73%
3Y*
14.03%
5Y*
9.44%
10Y*
9.20%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XLU vs. FUTY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XLU
State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF
4.61%16.03%23.31%-7.18%1.44%17.70%0.51%25.93%3.94%12.05%
FUTY
Fidelity MSCI Utilities Index ETF
4.60%16.40%23.20%-7.46%1.12%17.53%-0.80%24.89%4.36%12.52%

Correlation

The correlation between XLU and FUTY is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.00

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

1.00

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.00

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.99

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 25, 2013

0.99

The correlation between XLU and FUTY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.99 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.

XLU vs. FUTY - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XLU
FUTY

Utilities

100.0%
99.2%

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

0.5%

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

0.2%

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

XLU
100.0%
FUTY
99.2%

Basic Materials

XLU

-

FUTY

-

Communication Services

XLU

-

FUTY

-

Consumer Cyclical

XLU

-

FUTY

-

Consumer Defensive

XLU

-

FUTY

-

Energy

XLU

-

FUTY
0.5%

Financial Services

XLU

-

FUTY

-

Healthcare

XLU

-

FUTY

-

Industrials

XLU

-

FUTY
0.2%

Real Estate

XLU

-

FUTY

-

Technology

XLU

-

FUTY

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XLU vs. FUTY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XLU
XLU Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
XLU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLU Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLU Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
XLU Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLU Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank

FUTY
FUTY Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
FUTY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FUTY Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
FUTY Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
FUTY Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
FUTY Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XLU vs. FUTY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLU) and Fidelity MSCI Utilities Index ETF (FUTY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XLUFUTYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.04

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.17

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.41

1.48

-0.08

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.12

3.30

-0.18

XLU vs. FUTY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XLU Sharpe Ratio is 0.89, which is comparable to the FUTY Sharpe Ratio of 0.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XLU and FUTY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XLUFUTYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.89

0.93

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.55

0.55

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.49

0.48

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.40

0.56

-0.16

Drawdowns

XLU vs. FUTY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XLU drawdown since its inception was -51.98%, which is greater than FUTY's maximum drawdown of -36.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLU and FUTY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XLUFUTYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-51.98%

-36.44%

-15.54%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.18%

-8.93%

-0.25%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.26%

-17.35%

+0.09%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.26%

-25.11%

-0.15%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.07%

-36.44%

+0.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.43%

-5.99%

-0.44%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.22%

-6.03%

-4.19%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.13%

4.00%

+0.13%

Volatility

XLU vs. FUTY - Volatility Comparison

State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLU) and Fidelity MSCI Utilities Index ETF (FUTY) have volatilities of 5.44% and 5.49%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XLUFUTYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.44%

5.49%

-0.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.55%

11.41%

+0.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.49%

14.25%

+0.24%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.32%

17.08%

+0.24%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.26%

19.05%

+0.21%

XLU vs. FUTY - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both XLU and FUTY have an expense ratio of 0.08%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XLU vs. FUTY - Dividend Comparison

XLU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.68%, more than FUTY's 2.58% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FUTY
Fidelity MSCI Utilities Index ETF
2.58%2.67%2.96%3.31%2.72%2.70%3.07%2.82%3.11%3.03%3.35%4.33%
XLU
State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF
2.68%2.71%2.96%3.39%2.92%2.79%3.14%2.95%3.33%3.33%3.41%3.67%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 1.00, XLU and FUTY move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FUTY has higher volatility (5.49%) compared to XLU (5.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XLU dropped -51.98% vs FUTY's -36.44%.

On 10-year performance, XLU leads with 9.33% vs 9.20% for FUTY. Both ETFs have the same 0.08% expense ratio. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, XLU has performed better with a 9.33% return vs 9.20%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XLU and FUTY have the same expense ratio: 0.08% per year.

XLU has the higher dividend yield at 2.68%, compared with 2.58% for FUTY.

XLU tracks Utilities Select Sector Index, while FUTY tracks MSCI USA IMI Utilities Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Fidelity.

FUTY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.93 vs 0.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XLU and FUTY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer