PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XLU vs. XLE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XLU vs. XLE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLU) and State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XLU achieves a 6.16% return, which is significantly lower than XLE's 22.58% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with XLU having a 9.26% annualized return and XLE not far ahead at 9.29%.


XLU

1D
0.55%
1M
-0.76%
YTD
6.16%
6M
6.71%
1Y
14.60%
3Y*
14.60%
5Y*
10.41%
10Y*
9.26%

XLE

1D
1.26%
1M
-8.47%
YTD
22.58%
6M
23.97%
1Y
26.32%
3Y*
15.44%
5Y*
18.90%
10Y*
9.29%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XLU vs. XLE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XLU
State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF
6.16%16.03%23.31%-7.18%1.44%17.70%0.51%25.93%3.94%12.05%
XLE
State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF
22.58%7.88%5.56%-0.63%64.32%53.28%-32.67%11.74%-18.22%-0.89%

Correlation

The correlation between XLU and XLE is 0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.04

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.23

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.22

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.19

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 22, 1998

0.35

Over the past year, the correlation between XLU and XLE has dropped to 0.04 - well below their long-term average of 0.35, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

XLU vs. XLE - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XLU
XLE

Utilities

100.0%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

100.0%

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

XLU
100.0%
XLE

-

Basic Materials

XLU

-

XLE

-

Communication Services

XLU

-

XLE

-

Consumer Cyclical

XLU

-

XLE

-

Consumer Defensive

XLU

-

XLE

-

Energy

XLU

-

XLE
100.0%

Financial Services

XLU

-

XLE

-

Healthcare

XLU

-

XLE

-

Industrials

XLU

-

XLE

-

Real Estate

XLU

-

XLE

-

Technology

XLU

-

XLE

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XLU vs. XLE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XLU
XLU Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
XLU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLU Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLU Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
XLU Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLU Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank

XLE
XLE Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
XLE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLE Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLE Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
XLE Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLE Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XLU vs. XLE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLU) and State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XLUXLEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.26

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.34

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.21

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.60

1.88

-0.28

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.39

5.70

-2.31

XLU vs. XLE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XLU Sharpe Ratio is 1.00, which is comparable to the XLE Sharpe Ratio of 1.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XLU and XLE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XLU vs. XLE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XLU drawdown since its inception was -51.98%, smaller than the maximum XLE drawdown of -71.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLU and XLE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XLUXLEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-51.98%

-71.26%

+19.28%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.18%

-14.05%

+4.87%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.26%

-20.14%

+2.88%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.26%

-26.04%

+0.78%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.07%

-66.81%

+30.74%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.05%

-12.96%

+7.91%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.22%

-17.97%

+7.75%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.31%

4.66%

-0.35%

Volatility

XLU vs. XLE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLU) is 5.26%, while State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE) has a volatility of 7.06%. This indicates that XLU experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XLE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XLUXLEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.26%

7.06%

-1.80%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.72%

16.89%

-5.17%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.70%

20.96%

-6.26%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.31%

25.98%

-8.67%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.28%

29.62%

-10.34%

XLU vs. XLE - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both XLU and XLE have an expense ratio of 0.08%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XLU vs. XLE - Dividend Comparison

XLU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.30%, less than XLE's 3.47% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
XLE
State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF
3.47%3.28%3.36%3.55%3.68%4.21%5.62%6.72%3.54%3.03%2.26%3.39%
XLU
State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF
3.30%2.71%2.96%3.39%2.92%2.79%3.14%2.95%3.33%3.33%3.41%3.67%

Frequently Asked Questions


XLU and XLE have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XLE has higher volatility (7.06%) compared to XLU (5.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XLU dropped -51.98% vs XLE's -71.26%.

On 10-year performance, XLE leads with 9.29% vs 9.26% for XLU. Both ETFs have the same 0.08% expense ratio. On volatility, XLU has been the lower-risk option at 5.26%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, XLE has performed better with a 9.29% return vs 9.26%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XLU and XLE have the same expense ratio: 0.08% per year.

XLE has the higher dividend yield at 3.47%, compared with 3.30% for XLU.

XLU is categorized as Utilities Equities, while XLE is Energy Equities. XLU tracks Utilities Select Sector Index, while XLE tracks Energy Select Sector Index.

XLE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.26 vs 1.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XLU and XLE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer