XLII vs. SPYG
XLII (State Street Industrial Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF) and SPYG (State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XLII is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by State Street, while SPYG is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Growth Index. XLII is actively managed, while SPYG is passively managed. A 0.57 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XLII charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for SPYG.
Performance
XLII vs. SPYG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XLII achieves a 6.73% return, which is significantly lower than SPYG's 13.75% return.
XLII
- 1D
- -0.15%
- 1M
- 2.45%
- YTD
- 6.73%
- 6M
- 8.74%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SPYG
- 1D
- -0.98%
- 1M
- 7.38%
- YTD
- 13.75%
- 6M
- 13.57%
- 1Y
- 33.95%
- 3Y*
- 28.16%
- 5Y*
- 16.07%
- 10Y*
- 18.20%
XLII vs. SPYG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
XLII State Street Industrial Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF | 6.73% | 6.62% |
SPYG State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF | 13.75% | 8.36% |
Correlation
The correlation between XLII and SPYG is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 31, 2025 | 0.57 |
XLII vs. SPYG - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XLII
SPYG
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Financial Services
XLII
SPYG
Basic Materials
XLII
-
SPYG
Communication Services
XLII
-
SPYG
Consumer Cyclical
XLII
-
SPYG
Consumer Defensive
XLII
-
SPYG
Energy
XLII
-
SPYG
Healthcare
XLII
-
SPYG
Industrials
XLII
-
SPYG
Real Estate
XLII
-
SPYG
Technology
XLII
-
SPYG
Utilities
XLII
-
SPYG
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XLII vs. SPYG — Risk / Return Rank
XLII
SPYG
XLII vs. SPYG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street Industrial Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF (XLII) and State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF (SPYG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XLII | SPYG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.12 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.76 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.88 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.44 | 0.35 | +1.09 |
Drawdowns
XLII vs. SPYG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XLII drawdown since its inception was -10.10%, smaller than the maximum SPYG drawdown of -67.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLII and SPYG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XLII | SPYG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -10.10% | -67.63% | +57.53% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -13.76% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -22.14% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -32.67% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -32.67% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.36% | -1.13% | +0.77% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.34% | -24.33% | +22.99% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.32% | — |
Volatility
XLII vs. SPYG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XLII | SPYG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 4.35% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 12.46% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.55% | 16.06% | -4.51% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.55% | 21.17% | -9.62% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.55% | 20.64% | -9.09% |
XLII vs. SPYG - Expense Ratio Comparison
XLII has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than SPYG's 0.04% expense ratio.
Dividends
XLII vs. SPYG - Dividend Comparison
XLII's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.29%, more than SPYG's 0.47% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPYG State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF | 0.47% | 0.52% | 0.60% | 1.15% | 1.03% | 0.62% | 0.90% | 1.37% | 1.51% | 1.41% | 1.55% | 1.57% |
XLII State Street Industrial Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF | 11.29% | 5.47% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XLII and SPYG have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SPYG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SPYG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for XLII.
XLII has the higher dividend yield at 11.29%, compared with 0.47% for SPYG.
XLII is categorized as Derivative Income, while SPYG is S&P 500. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XLII and 0.04% for SPYG.
Find the right allocation for XLII and SPYG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer