XLII vs. IPAV
XLII (State Street Industrial Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF) and IPAV (Global X Infrastructure Development ex-U.S. ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XLII is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by State Street, while IPAV is a Industrials Equities fund tracking the Global X Infrastructure Development ex-U.S. Index. XLII is actively managed, while IPAV is passively managed. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XLII charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for IPAV.
Performance
XLII vs. IPAV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XLII achieves a 11.30% return, which is significantly lower than IPAV's 14.68% return.
XLII
- 1D
- 0.39%
- 1M
- 5.51%
- YTD
- 11.30%
- 6M
- 10.97%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IPAV
- 1D
- 1.05%
- 1M
- 0.99%
- YTD
- 14.68%
- 6M
- 15.91%
- 1Y
- 31.70%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XLII vs. IPAV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
XLII State Street Industrial Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF | 11.30% | 6.30% |
IPAV Global X Infrastructure Development ex-U.S. ETF | 14.68% | 8.23% |
Correlation
The correlation between XLII and IPAV is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 30, 2025 | 0.64 |
XLII vs. IPAV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XLII
IPAV
Financial Services
-
Industrials
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Financial Services
XLII
IPAV
-
Industrials
XLII
IPAV
Technology
XLII
IPAV
Consumer Cyclical
XLII
IPAV
Basic Materials
XLII
-
IPAV
Communication Services
XLII
-
IPAV
Consumer Defensive
XLII
-
IPAV
-
Energy
XLII
-
IPAV
Healthcare
XLII
-
IPAV
-
Real Estate
XLII
-
IPAV
Utilities
XLII
-
IPAV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XLII vs. IPAV — Risk / Return Rank
XLII
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
IPAV
XLII vs. IPAV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street Industrial Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF (XLII) and Global X Infrastructure Development ex-U.S. ETF (IPAV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XLII | IPAV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.32 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.18 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 7.58 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XLII vs. IPAV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XLII drawdown since its inception was -10.10%, smaller than the maximum IPAV drawdown of -14.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLII and IPAV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XLII | IPAV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -10.10% | -14.59% | +4.49% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -14.59% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -4.30% | +4.30% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.30% | -3.59% | +2.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 4.19% | — |
Volatility
XLII vs. IPAV - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XLII | IPAV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 6.26% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 15.51% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.12% | 17.75% | -5.63% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.12% | 17.92% | -5.80% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.12% | 17.92% | -5.80% |
XLII vs. IPAV - Expense Ratio Comparison
XLII has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than IPAV's 0.55% expense ratio.
Dividends
XLII vs. IPAV - Dividend Comparison
XLII's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.82%, more than IPAV's 1.12% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
IPAV Global X Infrastructure Development ex-U.S. ETF | 1.12% | 1.29% | 0.31% |
XLII State Street Industrial Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF | 10.82% | 5.47% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XLII and IPAV have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XLII is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XLII is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for IPAV.
XLII has the higher dividend yield at 10.82%, compared with 1.12% for IPAV.
XLII is categorized as Derivative Income, while IPAV is Industrials Equities. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XLII and 0.55% for IPAV.
Find the right allocation for XLII and IPAV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer