SPYG vs. VOO
SPYG (State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF) and VOO (Vanguard S&P 500 ETF) are both S&P 500 funds - SPYG tracks the S&P 500 Growth Index while VOO tracks the S&P 500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SPYG returned 18.34%/yr vs 15.77%/yr for VOO. Their correlation of 0.95 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SPYG charges 0.04%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for VOO.
Performance
SPYG vs. VOO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SPYG achieves a 11.38% return, which is significantly higher than VOO's 9.75% return. Over the past 10 years, SPYG has outperformed VOO with an annualized return of 18.34%, while VOO has yielded a comparatively lower 15.77% annualized return.
SPYG
- 1D
- -0.71%
- 1M
- 0.34%
- YTD
- 11.38%
- 6M
- 11.00%
- 1Y
- 31.61%
- 3Y*
- 26.51%
- 5Y*
- 14.78%
- 10Y*
- 18.34%
VOO
- 1D
- -0.29%
- 1M
- 0.08%
- YTD
- 9.75%
- 6M
- 9.30%
- 1Y
- 26.77%
- 3Y*
- 21.36%
- 5Y*
- 13.58%
- 10Y*
- 15.77%
SPYG vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPYG State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF | 11.38% | 22.09% | 35.99% | 30.02% | -29.41% | 32.01% | 33.46% | 30.84% | -0.12% | 27.24% |
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | 9.75% | 17.82% | 24.98% | 26.32% | -18.17% | 28.79% | 18.32% | 31.37% | -4.50% | 21.77% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPYG and VOO is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 9, 2010 | 0.95 |
The correlation between SPYG and VOO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.
SPYG vs. VOO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SPYG
VOO
Technology
Communication Services
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Utilities
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Energy
Technology
SPYG
VOO
Communication Services
SPYG
VOO
Financial Services
SPYG
VOO
Consumer Cyclical
SPYG
VOO
Healthcare
SPYG
VOO
Industrials
SPYG
VOO
Utilities
SPYG
VOO
Consumer Defensive
SPYG
VOO
Real Estate
SPYG
VOO
Basic Materials
SPYG
VOO
Energy
SPYG
VOO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPYG vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank
SPYG
VOO
SPYG vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF (SPYG) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SPYG | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.31 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.40 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.39 | -0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.31 | 3.02 | -0.71 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.21 | 13.58 | -4.37 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SPYG vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPYG drawdown since its inception was -67.63%, which is greater than VOO's maximum drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPYG and VOO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPYG | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -67.63% | -33.99% | -33.64% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.76% | -8.90% | -4.86% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.14% | -18.69% | -3.45% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.67% | -24.52% | -8.15% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -32.67% | -33.99% | +1.32% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.19% | -1.74% | -1.45% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -24.28% | -3.68% | -20.60% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.44% | 1.98% | +1.46% |
Volatility
SPYG vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison
State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF (SPYG) has a higher volatility of 6.83% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) at 4.60%. This indicates that SPYG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPYG | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.83% | 4.60% | +2.23% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.72% | 9.73% | +3.99% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.11% | 12.39% | +4.72% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.34% | 16.90% | +4.44% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.74% | 18.05% | +2.69% |
SPYG vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPYG has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SPYG vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison
SPYG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.60%, less than VOO's 1.04% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPYG State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF | 0.60% | 0.52% | 0.60% | 1.15% | 1.03% | 0.62% | 0.90% | 1.37% | 1.51% | 1.41% | 1.55% | 1.57% |
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | 1.04% | 1.13% | 1.24% | 1.46% | 1.69% | 1.25% | 1.54% | 1.88% | 2.06% | 1.78% | 2.02% | 2.10% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.94, SPYG and VOO move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
SPYG has higher volatility (6.83%) compared to VOO (4.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPYG dropped -67.63% vs VOO's -33.99%.
On 10-year performance, SPYG leads with 18.34% vs 15.77% for VOO. On fees, VOO is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VOO has been the lower-risk option at 4.60%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SPYG has performed better with a 18.34% return vs 15.77%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VOO is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.04% for SPYG.
VOO has the higher dividend yield at 1.04%, compared with 0.60% for SPYG.
SPYG tracks S&P 500 Growth Index, while VOO tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for SPYG and 0.03% for VOO.
VOO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.17 vs 1.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SPYG and VOO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer