XLII vs. JETS
XLII (State Street Industrial Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF) and JETS (U.S. Global Jets ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XLII is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by State Street, while JETS is a Industrials Equities fund tracking the U.S. Global Jets Index. XLII is actively managed, while JETS is passively managed. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XLII charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for JETS.
Performance
XLII vs. JETS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XLII achieves a 6.73% return, which is significantly higher than JETS's -0.86% return.
XLII
- 1D
- -0.15%
- 1M
- 2.45%
- YTD
- 6.73%
- 6M
- 8.74%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
JETS
- 1D
- -2.35%
- 1M
- 9.48%
- YTD
- -0.86%
- 6M
- 3.46%
- 1Y
- 22.85%
- 3Y*
- 14.30%
- 5Y*
- 1.37%
- 10Y*
- 2.63%
XLII vs. JETS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
XLII State Street Industrial Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF | 6.73% | 6.62% |
JETS U.S. Global Jets ETF | -0.86% | 17.67% |
Correlation
The correlation between XLII and JETS is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 31, 2025 | 0.62 |
XLII vs. JETS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XLII
JETS
Financial Services
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
-
Financial Services
XLII
JETS
-
Basic Materials
XLII
-
JETS
-
Communication Services
XLII
-
JETS
-
Consumer Cyclical
XLII
-
JETS
Consumer Defensive
XLII
-
JETS
-
Energy
XLII
-
JETS
-
Healthcare
XLII
-
JETS
-
Industrials
XLII
-
JETS
Real Estate
XLII
-
JETS
-
Technology
XLII
-
JETS
Utilities
XLII
-
JETS
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XLII vs. JETS — Risk / Return Rank
XLII
JETS
XLII vs. JETS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street Industrial Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF (XLII) and U.S. Global Jets ETF (JETS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XLII | JETS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 0.70 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.04 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.08 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.44 | 0.05 | +1.39 |
Drawdowns
XLII vs. JETS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XLII drawdown since its inception was -10.10%, smaller than the maximum JETS drawdown of -64.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLII and JETS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XLII | JETS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -10.10% | -64.92% | +54.82% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -24.13% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -35.21% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -44.36% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -64.92% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.36% | -17.40% | +17.04% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.34% | -25.19% | +23.85% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 9.40% | — |
Volatility
XLII vs. JETS - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XLII | JETS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 11.74% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 24.23% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.55% | 32.61% | -21.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.55% | 32.27% | -20.72% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.55% | 34.18% | -22.63% |
XLII vs. JETS - Expense Ratio Comparison
XLII has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than JETS's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
XLII vs. JETS - Dividend Comparison
XLII's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.29%, more than JETS's 0.84% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JETS U.S. Global Jets ETF | 0.84% | 0.83% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.67% | 0.04% | 1.24% | 0.09% | 1.57% | 0.58% | 0.17% |
XLII State Street Industrial Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF | 11.29% | 5.47% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XLII and JETS have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XLII is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XLII is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for JETS.
XLII has the higher dividend yield at 11.29%, compared with 0.84% for JETS.
XLII is categorized as Derivative Income, while JETS is Industrials Equities. They also come from different issuers: State Street and US Global. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XLII and 0.60% for JETS.
Find the right allocation for XLII and JETS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer