PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XLII vs. CWII
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XLII vs. CWII - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street Industrial Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF (XLII) and REX CRWV Growth & Income ETF (CWII). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XLII achieves a 11.30% return, which is significantly lower than CWII's 13,199.78% return.


XLII

1D
0.39%
1M
5.51%
YTD
11.30%
6M
10.97%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

CWII

1D
0.00%
1M
10,273.16%
YTD
13,199.78%
6M
11,535.41%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XLII vs. CWII - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between XLII and CWII is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 4, 2025

0.28

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XLII vs. CWII - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street Industrial Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF (XLII) and REX CRWV Growth & Income ETF (CWII). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

XLII vs. CWII - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XLII vs. CWII - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XLII drawdown since its inception was -10.10%, smaller than the maximum CWII drawdown of -51.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLII and CWII.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XLIICWIIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-10.10%

-51.04%

+40.94%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.30%

-33.26%

+31.96%

Volatility

XLII vs. CWII - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XLIICWIIDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.12%

13,701.30%

-13,689.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.12%

13,701.30%

-13,689.18%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.12%

13,701.30%

-13,689.18%

XLII vs. CWII - Expense Ratio Comparison

XLII has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than CWII's 1.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

XLII vs. CWII - Dividend Comparison

XLII's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.82%, less than CWII's 123.26% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


XLII and CWII have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XLII is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XLII is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 1.03% for CWII.

CWII has the higher dividend yield at 123.26%, compared with 10.82% for XLII.

They also come from different issuers: State Street and REX Shares. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XLII and 1.03% for CWII.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XLII and CWII

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer