PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPYG vs. SCHG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPYG vs. SCHG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF (SPYG) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPYG achieves a 11.38% return, which is significantly higher than SCHG's 2.76% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with SPYG having a 18.34% annualized return and SCHG not far ahead at 18.81%.


SPYG

1D
-0.71%
1M
0.34%
YTD
11.38%
6M
11.00%
1Y
31.61%
3Y*
26.51%
5Y*
14.78%
10Y*
18.34%

SCHG

1D
-1.24%
1M
-2.59%
YTD
2.76%
6M
2.11%
1Y
20.89%
3Y*
22.70%
5Y*
13.68%
10Y*
18.81%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPYG vs. SCHG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SPYG
State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF
11.38%22.09%35.99%30.02%-29.41%32.01%33.46%30.84%-0.12%27.24%
SCHG
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF
2.76%17.50%34.95%50.10%-31.80%28.11%39.14%36.02%-1.36%28.05%

Correlation

The correlation between SPYG and SCHG is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.97

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.98

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.98

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.98

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 11, 2009

0.98

The correlation between SPYG and SCHG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

SPYG vs. SCHG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SPYG
SCHG

Technology

52.1%
46.7%

Communication Services

15.9%
15.3%

Financial Services

9.0%
6.6%

Consumer Cyclical

8.5%
12.4%

Healthcare

5.9%
8.4%

Industrials

5.4%
6.0%

Utilities

1.2%
0.4%

Consumer Defensive

1.0%
1.6%

Real Estate

0.6%
0.5%

Basic Materials

0.3%
1.3%

Energy

0.1%
0.7%

Technology

SPYG
52.1%
SCHG
46.7%

Communication Services

SPYG
15.9%
SCHG
15.3%

Financial Services

SPYG
9.0%
SCHG
6.6%

Consumer Cyclical

SPYG
8.5%
SCHG
12.4%

Healthcare

SPYG
5.9%
SCHG
8.4%

Industrials

SPYG
5.4%
SCHG
6.0%

Utilities

SPYG
1.2%
SCHG
0.4%

Consumer Defensive

SPYG
1.0%
SCHG
1.6%

Real Estate

SPYG
0.6%
SCHG
0.5%

Basic Materials

SPYG
0.3%
SCHG
1.3%

Energy

SPYG
0.1%
SCHG
0.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPYG vs. SCHG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPYG
SPYG Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
SPYG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPYG Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPYG Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
SPYG Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPYG Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHG
SCHG Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
SCHG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHG Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHG Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHG Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHG Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPYG vs. SCHG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF (SPYG) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SPYGSCHGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.56

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.74

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.23

+0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.31

1.28

+1.03

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.21

4.19

+5.02

SPYG vs. SCHG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPYG Sharpe Ratio is 1.86, which is higher than the SCHG Sharpe Ratio of 1.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPYG and SCHG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SPYG vs. SCHG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPYG drawdown since its inception was -67.63%, which is greater than SCHG's maximum drawdown of -34.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPYG and SCHG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPYGSCHGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-67.63%

-34.59%

-33.04%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.76%

-16.41%

+2.65%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.14%

-23.39%

+1.25%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.67%

-34.59%

+1.92%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.67%

-34.59%

+1.92%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.19%

-5.16%

+1.97%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-24.28%

-5.20%

-19.08%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.44%

5.00%

-1.56%

Volatility

SPYG vs. SCHG - Volatility Comparison

State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF (SPYG) has a higher volatility of 6.83% compared to Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) at 5.78%. This indicates that SPYG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPYGSCHGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.83%

5.78%

+1.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.72%

12.50%

+1.22%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.11%

16.21%

+0.90%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.34%

22.37%

-1.03%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.74%

21.61%

-0.87%

SPYG vs. SCHG - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both SPYG and SCHG have an expense ratio of 0.04%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SPYG vs. SCHG - Dividend Comparison

SPYG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.60%, more than SCHG's 0.38% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SCHG
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF
0.38%0.36%0.39%0.46%0.55%0.42%0.52%0.82%1.27%1.01%1.04%1.22%
SPYG
State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF
0.60%0.52%0.60%1.15%1.03%0.62%0.90%1.37%1.51%1.41%1.55%1.57%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.97, SPYG and SCHG move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

SPYG has higher volatility (6.83%) compared to SCHG (5.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPYG dropped -67.63% vs SCHG's -34.59%.

On 10-year performance, SCHG leads with 18.81% vs 18.34% for SPYG. Both ETFs have the same 0.04% expense ratio. On volatility, SCHG has been the lower-risk option at 5.78%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SCHG has performed better with a 18.81% return vs 18.34%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPYG and SCHG have the same expense ratio: 0.04% per year.

SPYG has the higher dividend yield at 0.60%, compared with 0.38% for SCHG.

SPYG is categorized as S&P 500, while SCHG is Large Cap Growth Equities. SPYG tracks S&P 500 Growth Index, while SCHG tracks Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Charles Schwab.

SPYG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.86 vs 1.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPYG and SCHG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer